Padhee Swati, Alambo Amanuel, Banerjee Tanvi, Subramaniam Arvind, Abrams Daniel M, Nave Gary K, Shah Nirmish
Wright State University, Dayton, USA.
Duke University, Durham, USA.
Pattern Recognit (2021). 2021 Jan;12662:77-85. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-68790-8_7. Epub 2021 Feb 23.
Pain in sickle cell disease (SCD) is often associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and high healthcare costs. The standard method for predicting the absence, presence, and intensity of pain has long been self-report. However, medical providers struggle to manage patients based on subjective pain reports correctly and pain medications often lead to further difficulties in patient communication as they may cause sedation and sleepiness. Recent studies have shown that objective physiological measures can predict subjective self-reported pain scores for inpatient visits using machine learning (ML) techniques. In this study, we evaluate the generalizability of ML techniques to data collected from 50 patients over an extended period across three types of hospital visits (i.e., inpatient, outpatient and outpatient evaluation). We compare five classification algorithms for various pain intensity levels at both intra-individual (within each patient) and inter-individual (between patients) level. While all the tested classifiers perform much better than chance, a Decision Tree (DT) model performs best at predicting pain on an 11-point severity scale (from 0-10) with an accuracy of 0.728 at an inter-individual level and 0.653 at an intra-individual level. The accuracy of DT significantly improves to 0.941 on a 2-point rating scale (i.e., no/mild pain: 0-5, severe pain: 6-10) at an inter-individual level. Our experimental results demonstrate that ML techniques can provide an objective and quantitative evaluation of pain intensity levels for all three types of hospital visits.
镰状细胞病(SCD)中的疼痛通常与发病率增加、死亡率上升以及高昂的医疗成本相关。长期以来,预测疼痛是否存在、疼痛强度的标准方法一直是自我报告。然而,医疗服务提供者很难基于主观疼痛报告正确地管理患者,而且止痛药物可能会导致镇静和嗜睡,进而在患者沟通方面引发更多困难。最近的研究表明,客观生理指标可以使用机器学习(ML)技术预测住院患者自我报告的主观疼痛评分。在本研究中,我们评估了ML技术对从50名患者在三种类型的医院就诊(即住院、门诊和门诊评估)的较长时间内收集的数据的通用性。我们在个体内(每位患者内部)和个体间(患者之间)层面比较了五种针对不同疼痛强度水平的分类算法。虽然所有测试的分类器表现都远高于随机水平,但决策树(DT)模型在预测11级严重程度量表(从0至10)的疼痛方面表现最佳,在个体间层面的准确率为0.728,在个体内层面的准确率为0.653。在2级评分量表(即无/轻度疼痛:0至5,重度疼痛:6至10)上,DT在个体间层面的准确率显著提高到0.941。我们的实验结果表明,ML技术可以为所有三种类型的医院就诊提供疼痛强度水平的客观定量评估。