Deparment of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Institute of Philosophy and Sociology, Polish Academy of Sciences, Warsaw, Poland.
PLoS One. 2021 Aug 4;16(8):e0254414. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0254414. eCollection 2021.
The contemporaneous association between higher socioeconomic position and better health is well established. Life course research has also demonstrated a lasting effect of childhood socioeconomic conditions on adult health and well-being. Yet, little is known about the separate health effects of intergenerational mobility-moving into a different socioeconomic position than one's parents-among early adults in the United States. Most studies on the health implications of mobility rely on cross-sectional datasets, which makes it impossible to differentiate between health selection and social causation effects. In addition, understanding the effects of social mobility on health at a relatively young age has been hampered by the paucity of health measures that reliably predict disease onset. Analysing 4,713 respondents aged 25 to 32 from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health's Waves I and IV, we use diagonal reference models to separately identify the effects of socioeconomic origin and destination, as well as social mobility on allostatic load among individuals in the United States. Using a combined measure of educational and occupational attainment, and accounting for individuals' initial health, we demonstrate that in addition to health gradient among the socially immobile, individuals' socioeconomic origin and destination are equally important for multi-system physiological dysregulation. Short-range upward mobility also has a positive and significant association with health. After mitigating health selection concerns in our observational data, this effect is observed only among those reporting poor health before experiencing social mobility. Our findings move towards the reconciliation of two theoretical perspectives, confirming the positive effect of upward mobility as predicted by the "rags to riches" perspective, while not contradicting potential costs associated with more extensive upward mobility experiences as predicted by the dissociative thesis.
同期较高的社会经济地位与较好的健康状况之间存在关联,这一点已得到充分证实。生命历程研究还表明,儿童时期的社会经济状况对成年人的健康和幸福具有持久影响。然而,人们对于美国早期成年人代际流动(与父母的社会经济地位不同)对健康的单独影响知之甚少。大多数关于流动对健康影响的研究都依赖于横断面数据集,这使得人们无法区分健康选择和社会因果效应。此外,由于缺乏可靠预测疾病发生的健康指标,理解社会流动对相对年轻的人的健康的影响受到了阻碍。通过分析来自全国青少年健康纵向研究的第 I 波和第 IV 波的 25 至 32 岁的 4713 名受访者,我们使用对角线参考模型来分别确定社会经济出身和目的地以及社会流动对美国个体的应激激素负担的影响。我们使用教育和职业成就的综合衡量标准,并考虑到个体的初始健康状况,证明了除了社会地位不变的人存在健康梯度外,个体的社会经济出身和目的地对于多系统生理失调同样重要。短期向上流动也与健康呈正相关且显著相关。在我们的观察数据中缓解了健康选择问题后,仅在那些报告在经历社会流动之前健康状况不佳的人中观察到这种影响。我们的研究结果有助于调和两种理论观点,证实了“由贫变富”观点所预测的向上流动的积极影响,同时也没有反驳与更广泛的向上流动经历相关的潜在成本,这与离散论点所预测的一致。