Suppr超能文献

气道装置和麻醉深度对儿童全身麻醉期间眼压测量的影响:一项随机对照试验。

Effect of airway device and depth of anesthesia on intra-ocular pressure measurement during general anesthesia in children: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Darlong Vanlal, Kalaiyarasan Ramkumar, Baidya Dalim K, Pandey Ravindra, Sinha Renu, Punj Jyotsna, Dada Tanuj

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Pain Medicine and Critical Care, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

Dr. R.P. Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2021 Apr-Jun;37(2):226-230. doi: 10.4103/joacp.JOACP_55_19. Epub 2021 Jul 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Accurate measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) under anaesthesia is essential for diagnosis and further management of pediatric glaucoma patients. However, depth of anaesthesia and use of airway device like laryngeal mask airway (LMA) or endotracheal tube can influence IOP values measured. We planned this study to compare change of IOP with facemask or LMA. Change of IOP at varying depth of anaesthesia was also assessed.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

After Institutional ethical clearance and informed parental consent, 89 children of glaucoma aged 0-12 years were included in this prospective randomized controlled trial. The children were randomized to facemask (Group M) and LMA (Group L). Sevoflurane was the sole general anaesthetic used in both the groups and IOP were recorded after induction, at BIS 40-60, after LMA insertion (Group L), at BIS 60-80 and BIS more than 80.

RESULTS

The IOP values did not differ significantly between the groups at BIS 40-60 and at BIS 60-80. Moreover, pre and post LMA insertion IOP values were also comparable in Gr L (p = 0.11). However, significant increase in IOP values were observed with increasing BIS values within each group. The mean IOP in Group M at BIS 40-60 was 13.41 ± 4.04 as compared to 14.18 ± 3.64 at BIS 60-80 (p = 0.003). There was a similar pattern observed in Group L, where mean IOP at BIS 40-60 & BIS 60-80 was 14.13 ± 4.90 and 15.52 ± 4.57 respectively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Either facemask or classic LMA can be safely used as per anaesthesiologist's preference without any significant effect on IOP. BIS monitoring may be used during IOP measurement in paediatric glaucoma suspects for accurate assessment of IOP.

摘要

背景与目的

准确测量麻醉状态下的眼压(IOP)对于小儿青光眼患者的诊断和进一步治疗至关重要。然而,麻醉深度以及喉罩气道(LMA)或气管内导管等气道装置的使用会影响所测量的眼压值。我们开展本研究以比较使用面罩或LMA时眼压的变化情况。同时还评估了不同麻醉深度下眼压的变化。

材料与方法

在获得机构伦理批准并取得家长知情同意后,89名年龄在0至12岁的青光眼患儿被纳入这项前瞻性随机对照试验。这些患儿被随机分为面罩组(M组)和LMA组(L组)。两组均仅使用七氟醚作为全身麻醉剂,并在诱导后、脑电双频指数(BIS)为40 - 60时、LMA插入后(L组)、BIS为60 - 80以及BIS大于80时记录眼压。

结果

在BIS为40 - 60和BIS为60 - 80时,两组的眼压值无显著差异。此外,L组在插入LMA前后的眼压值也具有可比性(p = 0.11)。然而,每组内随着BIS值增加,眼压值均出现显著升高。M组在BIS为40 - 60时的平均眼压为13.41 ± 4.04,而在BIS为60 - 80时为14.18 ± 3.64(p = 0.003)。L组也观察到类似模式,其中在BIS为40 - 60和BIS为60 - 80时的平均眼压分别为14.13 ± 4.90和15.52 ± 4.57(p < 0.001)。

结论

根据麻醉医生的偏好,面罩或传统LMA均可安全使用,且对眼压无显著影响。在小儿青光眼疑似患者测量眼压期间,可使用BIS监测以准确评估眼压。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6891/8289634/e2c4ac627b6d/JOACP-37-226-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验