The Ohio State College of Medicine, 370 West 9th Avenue, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer, Arthur G. James Cancer Hospital and Richard J. Solove Research Institute, 460 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
J Cancer Surviv. 2022 Oct;16(5):1023-1046. doi: 10.1007/s11764-021-01094-8. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
Healthy lifestyle (HL) behaviors and cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) have been individually shown to improve adverse effects of cancer treatment. Little is known about how such programs in tandem affect health-related outcomes. This review evaluates extant literature on tandem CBT/HL interventions on health-related outcomes in cancer survivors.
A comprehensive search of PubMed, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and Embase databases revealed numerous studies involving CBT and HL tandem interventions in cancer survivors in the last 20 years. Studies meeting the inclusion criteria were examined and assessed by the authors.
The 36 studies included 5199 participants. Interventions involved the use of CBT in combination with a HL condition (stress reduction, increasing physical activity, etc.). These tandem conditions were compared against no intervention, usual care, and/or CBT alone or HL alone. Interventions were delivered by a variety of interventionists, and over different durations. The most common HL target outcomes were stress, and insomnia. Most studies (31 of 36) reported a reduction in adverse treatment and/or cancer-related effects.
Findings were biased with the overrepresentation of breast cancer survivors, and underrepresentation of minority groups, and those with advanced cancer. Thus, this review highlights the need for further research to test tandem interventions against CBT alone and HL alone, and toward identifying the most efficacious interventions for dissemination and implementation across diverse groups of cancer survivors. Implications for cancer survivors Tandem CBT/HL interventions can improve health-related outcomes for cancer survivors when compared to usual care, but there is a paucity of knowledge to suggest differential outcomes when compared to CBT or HL alone.
健康的生活方式(HL)行为和认知行为疗法(CBT)已被证明可以单独改善癌症治疗的不良影响。但对于此类联合方案如何影响与健康相关的结果知之甚少。本综述评估了关于癌症幸存者中 CBT/HL 联合干预对与健康相关结果影响的现有文献。
通过对 PubMed、PsychINFO、CINAHL 和 Embase 数据库的全面检索,发现了过去 20 年中涉及癌症幸存者 CBT 和 HL 联合干预的大量研究。作者对符合纳入标准的研究进行了检查和评估。
36 项研究共纳入 5199 名参与者。干预措施涉及 CBT 与 HL 条件(减轻压力、增加身体活动等)的联合应用。这些联合条件与无干预、常规护理以及 CBT 或 HL 单独应用进行了比较。干预措施由各种干预者在不同的时间内进行。最常见的 HL 目标结果是压力和失眠。大多数研究(36 项研究中的 31 项)报告了治疗和/或癌症相关不良影响的减少。
研究结果存在偏倚,表现为乳腺癌幸存者的过度代表,以及少数群体和晚期癌症患者的代表性不足。因此,本综述强调需要进一步研究,以测试 CBT 与 HL 单独以及与 HL 单独应用相比的联合干预措施,并确定最有效的干预措施,以便在不同的癌症幸存者群体中进行推广和实施。
与常规护理相比,CBT/HL 联合干预可以改善癌症幸存者的健康相关结果,但与 CBT 或 HL 单独应用相比,缺乏关于不同结果的知识。