Boca Bene Ioana, Ciurea Anca Ileana, Ciortea Cristiana Augusta, Ștefan Paul Andrei, Lisencu Lorena Alexandra, Dudea Sorin Marian
Department of Radiology, "Iuliu Hatieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Department of Radiology, Emergency County Hospital, 400006 Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 13;11(7):1248. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11071248.
The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of the radiomic analysis of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography (CESM) in discriminating between breast cancers and background parenchymal enhancement (BPE).
This retrospective study included 38 patients that underwent CESM examinations for clinical purposes between January 2019-December 2020. A total of 57 malignant breast lesions and 23 CESM examinations with 31 regions of BPE were assessed through radiomic analysis using MaZda software. The parameters that demonstrated to be independent predictors for breast malignancy were exported into the B11 program and a k-nearest neighbor classifier (k-NN) was trained on the initial groups of patients and was tested using a validation group. Histopathology results obtained after surgery were considered the gold standard.
Radiomic analysis found WavEnLL_s_2 parameter as an independent predictor for breast malignancies with a sensitivity of 68.42% and a specificity of 83.87%. The prediction model that included CH1D6SumAverg, CN4D6Correlat, Kurtosis, Perc01, Perc10, Skewness, and WavEnLL_s_2 parameters had a sensitivity of 73.68% and a specificity of 80.65%. Higher values were obtained of WavEnLL_s_2 and the prediction model for tumors than for BPEs. The comparison between the ROC curves provided by the WaveEnLL_s_2 and the entire prediction model did not show statistically significant results ( = 0.0943). The k-NN classifier based on the parameter WavEnLL_s_2 had a sensitivity and specificity on training and validating groups of 71.93% and 45.16% vs. 60% and 44.44%, respectively.
Radiomic analysis has the potential to differentiate CESM between malignant lesions and BPE. Further quantitative insight into parenchymal enhancement patterns should be performed to facilitate the role of BPE in personalized clinical decision-making and risk assessment.
本研究旨在评估对比增强光谱乳腺造影(CESM)的放射组学分析在鉴别乳腺癌与背景实质强化(BPE)方面的有效性。
这项回顾性研究纳入了2019年1月至2020年12月期间因临床目的接受CESM检查的38例患者。使用MaZda软件通过放射组学分析评估了总共57个乳腺恶性病变以及23次包含31个BPE区域的CESM检查。将被证明是乳腺恶性肿瘤独立预测因子的参数输入到B11程序中,并在初始患者组上训练k近邻分类器(k-NN),并使用验证组进行测试。手术后获得的组织病理学结果被视为金标准。
放射组学分析发现WavEnLL_s_2参数是乳腺恶性肿瘤的独立预测因子,敏感性为68.42%,特异性为83.87%。包含CH1D6SumAverg、CN4D6Correlat、峰度、Perc01、Perc10、偏度和WavEnLL_s_2参数的预测模型敏感性为73.68%,特异性为80.65%。肿瘤的WavEnLL_s_2和预测模型的值高于BPE。WaveEnLL_s_2和整个预测模型提供的ROC曲线之间的比较未显示出统计学显著结果(P = 0.0943)。基于WavEnLL_s_2参数的k-NN分类器在训练组和验证组的敏感性和特异性分别为71.93%和45.16%,以及60%和44.44%。
放射组学分析有潜力区分CESM中的恶性病变和BPE。应进一步对实质强化模式进行定量洞察,以促进BPE在个性化临床决策和风险评估中的作用。