de Vries-Hospers H G, Welling G W, van der Waaij D
Laboratory for Medical Microbiology, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Pharm Weekbl Sci. 1987 Dec 11;9 Suppl:S41-4. doi: 10.1007/BF02075258.
Oral and faecal flora were monitored in ten healthy volunteers who received three different oral dosages of either norfloxacin or ciprofloxacin during five consecutive days. Oral flora was not influenced by either quinolone. At the end of the five day-treatment period aerobic Gram-negative bacilli could no longer be cultured from the faecal samples of any of the volunteers. Enterococci were suppressed in some volunteers or remained present in concentrations as high as before treatment. All ciprofloxacin-treated volunteers became colonized with yeasts in their faecal samples, even during treatment with the lowest dose. As measured by total microscopic bacterial clump counts and the appearance of beta-aspartylglycine in faecal samples neither of the two quinolones appeared to decrease the colonization resistance of the digestive tract.
对10名健康志愿者进行了口腔和粪便菌群监测,这些志愿者连续5天接受了三种不同口服剂量的诺氟沙星或环丙沙星。两种喹诺酮类药物均未影响口腔菌群。在为期5天的治疗期结束时,任何志愿者的粪便样本中均无法培养出需氧革兰氏阴性杆菌。一些志愿者的肠球菌受到抑制,或仍以与治疗前一样高的浓度存在。所有接受环丙沙星治疗的志愿者,即使在接受最低剂量治疗期间,其粪便样本中也出现了酵母菌定植。通过粪便样本中的细菌团块总数和β-天冬氨酰甘氨酸的出现情况来衡量,两种喹诺酮类药物似乎均未降低消化道的定植抗力。