Sian Tanvir S, Inns Thomas, Gates Amanda, Doleman Brett, Gharahdaghi Nima, Atherton Philip J, Lund Jon N, Phillips Bethan E
MRC-Versus Arthritis Centre for Musculoskeletal Ageing Research and NIHR Nottingham Biomedical Research Centre, School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, Derby, United Kingdom.
Department of Surgery and Anaesthesia, Royal Derby Hospital, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton, Derby, United Kingdom.
Front Sports Act Living. 2021 Jul 26;3:697518. doi: 10.3389/fspor.2021.697518. eCollection 2021.
Serious health implications from having low levels of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and being overweight in young adulthood are carried forward into later life. High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-effective, potent stimulus for improving CRF and indices of cardiometabolic health. To date, few studies have investigated the use of equipment-free HIIT or the impact of supervision for improving CRF via HIIT. Thirty healthy young adults (18-30 y) were randomised to 4 weeks (12 sessions) equipment-free, bodyweight based supervised laboratory HIIT (L-HIIT), unsupervised home HIIT (H-HIIT) or no-intervention (CON). Utilised exercises were star jumps, squats and standing sprints. Measurements of CRF (anaerobic threshold (AT) and VOpeak), blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), blood glucose and plasma insulin by oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT), and muscle architecture were performed at baseline and after the intervention. When compared to the control group, both HIIT protocols improved CRF (AT: L-HIIT mean difference compared to the control group (MD) +2.1 (95% CI: 0.34-4.03) ml/kg/min; = 0.02; H-HIIT MD +3.01 (1.17-4.85) ml/kg/min; = 0.002), VOpeak: L-HIIT (MD +2.94 (0.64-5.25) ml/kg/min; = 0.01; H-HIIT MD +2.55 (0.34-4.76) ml/kg/min; = 0.03), BMI (L-HIIT MD -0.43 (-0.86 to 0.00) kg/m; = 0.05; H-HIIT: MD -0.51 (-0.95 to -0.07) kg/m; = 0.03) and pennation angle (L-HIIT MD 0.2 (0.13-0.27)°; < 0.001; H-HIIT MD 0.17 (0.09 to 0.24)°; < 0.001). There was no significant change in BP, blood glucose or plasma insulin in any of the groups. Four weeks time-efficient, equipment-free, bodyweight-based HIIT is able to elicit improvements in CRF irrespective of supervision status. Unsupervised HIIT may be a useful tool for counteracting the rise of sedentary behaviours and consequent cardiometabolic disorders in young adults.
年轻时心肺适能(CRF)水平低和超重会对健康产生严重影响,并持续到晚年。高强度间歇训练(HIIT)是一种节省时间、有效的刺激方式,可改善CRF和心脏代谢健康指标。迄今为止,很少有研究调查无器械HIIT的应用或监督对通过HIIT改善CRF的影响。30名健康的年轻人(18 - 30岁)被随机分为三组,进行为期4周(共12节课程)的无器械、基于体重的实验室监督HIIT(L - HIIT)、无监督家庭HIIT(H - HIIT)或不干预(CON)。使用的练习动作有开合跳、深蹲和站立冲刺跑。在基线和干预后测量CRF(无氧阈值(AT)和峰值摄氧量(VOpeak))、血压(BP)、体重指数(BMI)、口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)后的血糖和血浆胰岛素水平,以及肌肉结构。与对照组相比,两种HIIT方案均改善了CRF(AT:L - HIIT与对照组相比的平均差异(MD)为 +2.1(95%可信区间:0.34 - 4.03)ml/kg/min;P = 0.02;H - HIIT MD为 +3.01(1.17 - 4.85)ml/kg/min;P = 0.002)、VOpeak:L - HIIT(MD为 +2.94(0.64 - 5.25)ml/kg/min;P = 0.01;H - HIIT MD为 +2.55(0.34 - 4.76)ml/kg/min;P = 0.03)、BMI(L - HIIT MD为 -0.43(-0.86至0.00)kg/m²;P = 0.05;H - HIIT:MD为 -0.51(-0.95至 -0.07)kg/m²;P = 0.03)和肌纤维羽状角(L - HIIT MD为0.2(0.13 - 0.27)°;P < 0.001;H - HIIT MD为0.17(0.09至0.24)°;P < 0.001)。任何一组的血压、血糖或血浆胰岛素均无显著变化。四周的省时、无器械、基于体重的HIIT能够改善CRF,无论监督状态如何。无监督的HIIT可能是一种有用的工具,可应对年轻人久坐行为增加及随之而来的心脏代谢紊乱问题。