• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

支持医疗保健专业人员采用辅助决策实践的机制是什么?快速务实的综述。

What are the mechanisms that support healthcare professionals to adopt assisted decision-making practice? A rapid realist review.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4802-x.

DOI:10.1186/s12913-019-4802-x
PMID:31831003
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6909502/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (UNCRPD) establishes a right to legal capacity for all people, including those with support needs. People with disabilities have a legal right to be given the appropriate supports to make informed decisions in all aspects of their lives, including health. In Ireland, the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act (2015) ratifies the Convention and has established a legal framework for Assisted Decision Making (ADM). The main provisions of the Act are not yet implemented. Codes of Practice to guide health and social care professionals are currently being developed. Internationally, concerns are expressed that ADM implementation is poorly understood. Using realist synthesis, this study aims to identify Programme Theory (PT) that will inform ADM implementation in healthcare.

METHODS

A Rapid Realist Review using collaborative methods was chosen to appraise relevant literature and engage knowledge users from Irish health and social care. The review was led by an expert panel of relevant stakeholders that developed the research question which asks, 'what mechanisms enable healthcare professionals to adopt ADM into practice?' To ensure the PT was inclusive of local contextual influences, five reference panels were conducted with healthcare professionals, family carers and people with dementia. PT was refined and tested iteratively through knowledge synthesis informed by forty-seven primary studies, reference panel discussions and expert panel refinement and consensus.

RESULTS

The review has developed an explanatory PT on ADM implementation in healthcare practice. The review identified four implementation domains as significant. These are Personalisation of Health & ADM Service Provision, Culture & Leadership, Environmental & Social Re-structuring and Education, Training & Enablement. Each domain is presented as an explanatory PT statement using realist convention that identifies context, mechanism and outcome configurations.

CONCLUSIONS

This realist review makes a unique contribution to this field. The PT can be applied by policymakers to inform intervention development and implementation strategy. It informs the imminent policy and practice developments in Ireland and has relevance for other worldwide healthcare systems dealing with similar legislative changes in line with UNCRPD.

摘要

背景

《联合国残疾人权利公约》(UNCRPD)为所有人确立了法律行为能力的权利,包括有支持需求的人。残疾人在生活的各个方面,包括健康,都有合法权利获得适当支持以做出明智决策。在爱尔兰,《辅助决策(能力)法》(2015 年)批准了该公约,并为辅助决策制定了法律框架。该法案的主要条款尚未实施。目前正在制定指导卫生和社会保健专业人员的行为守则。在国际上,人们对辅助决策的实施缺乏了解表示关切。本研究采用现实主义综合方法,旨在确定计划理论(PT),以告知医疗保健中的辅助决策实施。

方法

选择使用协作方法的快速现实主义审查来评估相关文献并让来自爱尔兰卫生和社会保健部门的知识使用者参与。该审查由一个由相关利益攸关方组成的专家小组领导,该小组制定了研究问题,即“哪些机制使医疗保健专业人员能够将辅助决策付诸实践?”为了确保该理论全面涵盖当地的背景影响,与医疗保健专业人员、家庭照顾者和痴呆症患者进行了五次参考小组讨论。通过对 47 项原始研究、参考小组讨论以及专家小组的改进和共识进行知识综合,对该理论进行了反复的改进和测试。

结果

该审查为医疗保健实践中的辅助决策实施制定了一个解释性的计划理论。该审查确定了四个重要的实施领域。这些是个性化健康和辅助决策服务提供、文化和领导力、环境和社会结构调整以及教育、培训和授权。每个领域都使用现实主义惯例呈现为解释性的计划理论陈述,其中包括背景、机制和结果配置。

结论

本次审查为该领域做出了独特贡献。该理论可由政策制定者用于为干预措施的制定和实施战略提供信息。它为爱尔兰即将出台的政策和实践发展提供了信息,并为其他全球医疗保健系统提供了相关信息,这些系统正在根据《联合国残疾人权利公约》进行类似的立法改革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a96/6909502/3a42e26e9922/12913_2019_4802_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a96/6909502/36c16d947971/12913_2019_4802_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a96/6909502/d854747daf0b/12913_2019_4802_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a96/6909502/3a42e26e9922/12913_2019_4802_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a96/6909502/36c16d947971/12913_2019_4802_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a96/6909502/d854747daf0b/12913_2019_4802_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5a96/6909502/3a42e26e9922/12913_2019_4802_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
What are the mechanisms that support healthcare professionals to adopt assisted decision-making practice? A rapid realist review.支持医疗保健专业人员采用辅助决策实践的机制是什么?快速务实的综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4802-x.
2
An examination of relational dynamics of power in the context of supported (assisted) decision-making with older people and those with disabilities in an acute healthcare setting.在急性医疗机构中,对老年人和残疾人的支持(辅助)决策背景下的权力关系动态进行考察。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1339-1348. doi: 10.1111/hex.13750. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
Explanation of context, mechanisms and outcomes in adult community mental health crisis care: the MH-CREST realist evidence synthesis.成人社区心理健康危机护理中的背景、机制和结果解释:MH-CREST 真实证据综合研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2023 Sep;11(15):1-161. doi: 10.3310/TWKK5110.
5
Challenges for people with intellectual disabilities in law enforcement interactions in Ireland; thematic analysis informed by 1537 person-years' experience.爱尔兰执法互动中智障人士面临的挑战;基于 1537 人年经验的主题分析。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2021 Mar-Apr;75:101683. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2021.101683. Epub 2021 Mar 6.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
"": A Qualitative Study on the Health Systems Responsiveness to Implementing the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act in Ireland.“”:一项关于爱尔兰实施辅助决策(能力)法案的卫生系统响应情况的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 9;17(9):3294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093294.
8
Identifying the context, mechanisms and outcomes underlying collective leadership in teams: building a realist programme theory.识别团队集体领导背后的背景、机制和结果:构建一个现实主义的方案理论。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Mar 30;20(1):261. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-05129-1.
9
Healthcare users' experiences of communicating with healthcare professionals about children who have life-limiting conditions: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医疗保健使用者就患有危及生命疾病的儿童与医疗保健专业人员沟通的经历:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Nov;13(11):33-42. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-2413.
10
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Patient and surgeon perspectives of a large-scale system for automated, real-time monitoring and feedback of shared decision-making integrated into surgical practice: a qualitative study.患者与外科医生对整合于外科实践中的共享决策自动化实时监测与反馈大规模系统的看法:一项定性研究
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 27;15(6):e099090. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099090.
2
Assessment of older adults' decision-making capacity for independent living: Findings from a nominal group technique meeting in Ireland.老年人独立生活决策能力评估:爱尔兰名义群体技术会议的结果
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Feb;72(1):e70005. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70005.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Clarifying the mechanisms and resources that enable the reciprocal involvement of seldom heard groups in health and social care research: A collaborative rapid realist review process.阐明使鲜少被听见的群体能够互惠参与健康和社会关怀研究的机制和资源:合作式快速务实主义审查过程。
Health Expect. 2019 Jun;22(3):298-306. doi: 10.1111/hex.12865. Epub 2019 Feb 6.
2
Middle managers' role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review.中层管理者在医疗保健中实施基于证据的实践中的作用:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 12;13(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0843-5.
3
Changing how we think about healthcare improvement.
Perspectives on the essential skills of healthcare decision making in children and adolescents with intellectual disability.
关注智障儿童和青少年医疗决策的基本技能。
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Jun 7;23(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02204-5.
4
Improving healthcare professionals' interactions with patients to tackle antimicrobial resistance: a systematic review of interventions, barriers, and facilitators.提高医疗保健专业人员与患者的互动以应对抗微生物药物耐药性:干预措施、障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 22;12:1359790. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1359790. eCollection 2024.
5
Communication partner training for student health and social care professionals engaging with people with stroke acquired communication difficulties: A protocol for a realist review.针对与中风后出现沟通障碍的患者打交道的学生健康和社会护理专业人员的沟通伙伴培训:一项现实主义综述方案
HRB Open Res. 2024 Apr 17;6:60. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13783.1. eCollection 2023.
6
An examination of relational dynamics of power in the context of supported (assisted) decision-making with older people and those with disabilities in an acute healthcare setting.在急性医疗机构中,对老年人和残疾人的支持(辅助)决策背景下的权力关系动态进行考察。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1339-1348. doi: 10.1111/hex.13750. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
7
Assessing Older Adults' Decision-Making Capacity for Independent Living: Practice Tensions and Complexities.评估老年人独立生活的决策能力:实践中的紧张关系和复杂性。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 May;41(5):1264-1273. doi: 10.1177/07334648211065029. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
8
A Rapid Realist Review of Quality Care Process Metrics Implementation in Nursing and Midwifery Practice.护理和助产学实践中优质护理流程指标实施的快速务实综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 13;18(22):11932. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182211932.
9
Discordance and concordance on perception of quality care at end of life between older patients, caregivers and clinicians: a scoping review.老年患者、照护者和临床医生对临终关怀质量感知的不和谐与和谐:范围综述。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Feb;13(1):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00549-6. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
10
Using a multidisciplinary approach to reveal decision-making capacity within acute care for an individual with aphasia.采用多学科方法揭示失语症患者在急性护理中的决策能力。
SAGE Open Med Case Rep. 2021 Jul 9;9:2050313X211027098. doi: 10.1177/2050313X211027098. eCollection 2021.
改变我们对医疗保健改善的看法。
BMJ. 2018 May 17;361:k2014. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k2014.
4
Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: a systematic integrative review.影响医疗保健环境中实施基于证据的实践的组织背景特征:系统综合评价。
Syst Rev. 2018 May 5;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5.
5
Care Planning: What Works, for Whom, and in What Circumstances? A Rapid Realist Review.照护计划:在何种情况下对谁有效?一项快速的现实主义综述。
Qual Health Res. 2018 Dec;28(14):2250-2266. doi: 10.1177/1049732318768807. Epub 2018 Apr 20.
6
How are people with dementia involved in care-planning and decision-making? An Irish social work perspective.痴呆症患者如何参与护理计划和决策制定?爱尔兰社会工作视角。
Dementia (London). 2019 Oct-Nov;18(7-8):2985-3003. doi: 10.1177/1471301218763180. Epub 2018 Mar 15.
7
Supported Decision Making in Serious Mental Illness.严重精神疾病中的支持性决策制定。
Psychiatry. 2018 Spring;81(1):28-40. doi: 10.1080/00332747.2017.1324697. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
8
Hospital-based interventions: a systematic review of staff-reported barriers and facilitators to implementation processes.基于医院的干预措施:对实施过程中员工报告的障碍和促进因素的系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Feb 23;13(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0726-9.
9
Undertaking a Collaborative Rapid Realist Review to Investigate What Works in the Successful Implementation of a Frail Older Person's Pathway.开展协作式快速现实主义综述,以研究在成功实施虚弱老年人途径方面的有效措施。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jan 25;15(2):199. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15020199.
10
Challenges to measuring and achieving shared decision-making in practice.在实践中衡量和实现共同决策面临的挑战。
Health Expect. 2018 Feb;21(1):1-2. doi: 10.1111/hex.12659.