• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

“”:一项关于爱尔兰实施辅助决策(能力)法案的卫生系统响应情况的定性研究。

"": A Qualitative Study on the Health Systems Responsiveness to Implementing the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act in Ireland.

机构信息

School of Nursing, Midwifery and Health Systems, University College Dublin, Belfield, 4 Dublin, Ireland.

School of Social Policy, Social Work and Social Justice, University College Dublin, Belfield, 4 Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 9;17(9):3294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093294.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph17093294
PMID:32397345
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7246817/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The Assisted Decision-Making (ADM) (Capacity) Act was enacted in 2015 in Ireland and will be commenced in 2021. This paper is focused on this pre-implementation stage within the acute setting and uses a health systems responsiveness framework.

METHODS

We conducted face-to-face interviews using a critical incident technique. We interviewed older people including those with a diagnosis of dementia ( = 8), family carers ( = 5) and health and social care professionals (HSCPs) working in the acute setting ( = 26).

RESULTS

The interviewees reflected upon a healthcare system that is currently under significant pressures. HSCPs are doing their best, but they are often halted from delivering on the will and preference of their patients. Many older people and family carers feel that they must be very assertive to have their preferences considered. All expressed concern about the strain on the healthcare system. There are significant environmental barriers that are hindering ADM practice.

CONCLUSIONS

The commencement of ADM provides an opportunity to redefine the provision, practices, and priorities of healthcare in Ireland to enable improved patient-centred care. To facilitate implementation of ADM, it is therefore critical to identify and provide adequate resources and work towards solutions to ensure a seamless commencement of the legislation.

摘要

目的

《辅助决策(能力)法》(ADM(Capacity)Act)于 2015 年在爱尔兰颁布,并将于 2021 年开始实施。本文聚焦于该法在急性治疗环境中的实施前阶段,并使用了卫生系统响应性框架。

方法

我们采用关键事件技术进行了面对面访谈。我们采访了老年人,包括被诊断患有痴呆症的老年人(=8)、家庭照顾者(=5)以及在急性治疗环境中工作的卫生和社会保健专业人员(HSCPs)(=26)。

结果

受访者反思了当前面临巨大压力的医疗体系。HSCPs 正在尽最大努力,但他们经常无法按照患者的意愿和偏好行事。许多老年人和家庭照顾者认为,他们必须非常坚定地主张自己的偏好才能得到考虑。所有人都对医疗系统的压力表示担忧。存在许多环境障碍,阻碍了辅助决策的实践。

结论

ADM 的启动为重新定义爱尔兰医疗保健的提供、实践和优先事项提供了机会,以实现以患者为中心的护理。为了促进 ADM 的实施,因此必须确定并提供足够的资源,并努力寻找解决方案,以确保该法规的顺利启动。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/7246817/cda22e1c4bdc/ijerph-17-03294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/7246817/cda22e1c4bdc/ijerph-17-03294-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fd3d/7246817/cda22e1c4bdc/ijerph-17-03294-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
"": A Qualitative Study on the Health Systems Responsiveness to Implementing the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act in Ireland.“”:一项关于爱尔兰实施辅助决策(能力)法案的卫生系统响应情况的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 9;17(9):3294. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093294.
2
An examination of relational dynamics of power in the context of supported (assisted) decision-making with older people and those with disabilities in an acute healthcare setting.在急性医疗机构中,对老年人和残疾人的支持(辅助)决策背景下的权力关系动态进行考察。
Health Expect. 2023 Jun;26(3):1339-1348. doi: 10.1111/hex.13750. Epub 2023 Mar 14.
3
Assisted decision-making and interprofessional collaboration in the care of older people: a qualitative study exploring perceptions of barriers and facilitators in the acute hospital setting.辅助老年人决策和跨专业合作:一项在急性医院环境中探索障碍和促进因素的定性研究。
J Interprof Care. 2021 Nov-Dec;35(6):852-862. doi: 10.1080/13561820.2020.1863342. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
4
What are the mechanisms that support healthcare professionals to adopt assisted decision-making practice? A rapid realist review.支持医疗保健专业人员采用辅助决策实践的机制是什么?快速务实的综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4802-x.
5
Shared decision-making in dementia care planning: barriers and facilitators in two European countries.痴呆症护理规划中的共同决策:两个欧洲国家的障碍与促进因素
Aging Ment Health. 2017 Jan;21(1):31-39. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2016.1255715. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
6
The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.医院环境中患者与护士以患者为中心的沟通体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):76-87. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1072.
7
Health professionals and patients' perspectives on person-centred maternal and child healthcare in Burkina Faso.卫生专业人员和患者对布基纳法索以患者为中心的母婴保健的看法。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 1;15(4):e0230340. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230340. eCollection 2020.
8
Palliative care healthcare professionals' perspective on the Assisted Decision-Making (Capacity) Act 2015 in Ireland.姑息治疗医护专业人员对爱尔兰2015年《辅助决策(能力)法案》的看法。
BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2024 Dec 19;14(e3):e2527-e2531. doi: 10.1136/spcare-2024-005065.
9
Involvement of people with schizophrenia in decision-making in rural Ethiopia: a qualitative study.精神分裂症患者参与农村埃塞俄比亚决策制定的情况:一项定性研究。
Global Health. 2018 Aug 22;14(1):85. doi: 10.1186/s12992-018-0403-4.
10
The experience of palliative care service provision for people with non-malignant respiratory disease and their family carers: An all-Ireland qualitative study.非恶性呼吸道疾病患者及其家庭照顾者的姑息治疗服务体验:全爱尔兰定性研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2018 Feb;74(2):383-394. doi: 10.1111/jan.13453. Epub 2017 Nov 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Triadic Perspectives on Decision Making in Psychiatry: A Qualitative Study on Service Users, Caregivers and Healthcare Professionals in Latvia.精神病学决策的三元视角:拉脱维亚服务使用者、护理人员和医疗保健专业人员的定性研究
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 13;13(12):1416. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121416.
2
Assessment of older adults' decision-making capacity for independent living: Findings from a nominal group technique meeting in Ireland.老年人独立生活决策能力评估:爱尔兰名义群体技术会议的结果
Aust Occup Ther J. 2025 Feb;72(1):e70005. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.70005.
3
Trust in embedding co-design for innovation and change: considering the role of senior leaders and managers.

本文引用的文献

1
Assessing health system responsiveness in primary health care facilities in Tanzania.评估坦桑尼亚基层医疗保健设施的卫生系统反应能力。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2020 Feb 10;20(1):104. doi: 10.1186/s12913-020-4961-9.
2
What are the mechanisms that support healthcare professionals to adopt assisted decision-making practice? A rapid realist review.支持医疗保健专业人员采用辅助决策实践的机制是什么?快速务实的综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Dec 12;19(1):960. doi: 10.1186/s12913-019-4802-x.
3
Implementation of government-directed policy in the hospital setting: a modified Delphi study.
信任嵌入式共同设计以促进创新和变革:考虑高级领导和管理者的角色。
J Health Organ Manag. 2024 Feb 21;38(9):36-44. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-07-2023-0207.
4
What Can We Learn From a Human-Rights Based Approach to Disability for Public and Patient Involvement in Research?我们能从基于人权的残疾方法中学到什么,以促进公众和患者参与研究?
Front Rehabil Sci. 2022 Apr 22;3:878231. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2022.878231. eCollection 2022.
5
Emergency Department Communication in Persons Living With Dementia and Care Partners: A Scoping Review.痴呆症患者及其照护伙伴的急诊科沟通:范围综述。
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2022 Aug;23(8):1313.e15-1313.e46. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2022.02.024.
6
Assessing Older Adults' Decision-Making Capacity for Independent Living: Practice Tensions and Complexities.评估老年人独立生活的决策能力:实践中的紧张关系和复杂性。
J Appl Gerontol. 2022 May;41(5):1264-1273. doi: 10.1177/07334648211065029. Epub 2022 Jan 21.
7
What Are the Psycho-Social and Information Needs of Adolescents and Young Adults Cancer Care Consumers with Intellectual Disability? A Systematic Review of Evidence with Recommendations for Future Research and Practice.患有智力残疾的青少年和青年癌症护理消费者的心理社会需求和信息需求是什么?证据的系统评价及对未来研究和实践的建议。
Children (Basel). 2021 Dec 2;8(12):1118. doi: 10.3390/children8121118.
8
Discordance and concordance on perception of quality care at end of life between older patients, caregivers and clinicians: a scoping review.老年患者、照护者和临床医生对临终关怀质量感知的不和谐与和谐:范围综述。
Eur Geriatr Med. 2022 Feb;13(1):87-99. doi: 10.1007/s41999-021-00549-6. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
9
(In)Visible illness: A photovoice study of the lived experience of self-managing rheumatoid arthritis.隐性疾病:类风湿关节炎自我管理的生活体验的影像叙事研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Mar 8;16(3):e0248151. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248151. eCollection 2021.
10
New Ways of Working? A Rapid Exploration of Emerging Evidence Regarding the Care of Older People during COVID19.新的工作方式?对 COVID-19 期间老年人护理的新兴证据的快速探索。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Sep 4;17(18):6442. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17186442.
政府主导政策在医院环境中的实施:一项修正后的德尔菲研究。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2019 Nov 27;17(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12961-019-0500-8.
4
Deciding in dementia: The possibilities and limits of supported decision-making.痴呆症决策:支持决策的可能性和局限性。
Int J Law Psychiatry. 2019 Sep-Oct;66:101466. doi: 10.1016/j.ijlp.2019.101466. Epub 2019 Jul 17.
5
Making health care responsive to the needs of older people.使医疗保健能够响应老年人的需求。
Age Ageing. 2019 Nov 1;48(6):785-788. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afz085.
6
The co-design, implementation and evaluation of a serious board game 'PlayDecide patient safety' to educate junior doctors about patient safety and the importance of reporting safety concerns.设计、实施和评估一款严肃棋盘游戏“PlayDecide 患者安全”,以教育年轻医生患者安全和报告安全问题重要性。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Jun 25;19(1):232. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1655-2.
7
Making healthcare decisions in a person's best interests when they lack capacity: clinical guidance based on a review of evidence.在患者缺乏能力时为其做出符合最佳利益的医疗保健决策:基于证据综述的临床指南。
Clin Rehabil. 2019 Oct;33(10):1571-1585. doi: 10.1177/0269215519852987. Epub 2019 Jun 6.
8
Middle managers' role in implementing evidence-based practices in healthcare: a systematic review.中层管理者在医疗保健中实施基于证据的实践中的作用:系统评价。
Implement Sci. 2018 Dec 12;13(1):149. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0843-5.
9
Supporting shared decision making for older people with multiple health and social care needs: a realist synthesis.支持有多种健康和社会护理需求的老年人共同决策:一个现实主义的综合研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2018 Jul 18;18(1):165. doi: 10.1186/s12877-018-0853-9.
10
Organizational contextual features that influence the implementation of evidence-based practices across healthcare settings: a systematic integrative review.影响医疗保健环境中实施基于证据的实践的组织背景特征:系统综合评价。
Syst Rev. 2018 May 5;7(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0734-5.