Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;149(3):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.035. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
Despite a better understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of patients with anaphylaxis, there remain knowledge gaps. Enumerating and prioritizing these gaps would allow limited scientific resources to be directed more effectively.
We sought to systematically describe and appraise anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities based on their potential impact and feasibility.
We convened a 25-member multidisciplinary panel of anaphylaxis experts. Panelists formulated knowledge gaps/research priority statements in an anonymous electronic survey. Four anaphylaxis themed writing groups were formed to refine statements: (1) Population Science, (2) Basic and Translational Sciences, (3) Emergency Department Care/Acute Management, and (4) Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention. Revised statements were incorporated into an anonymous electronic survey, and panelists were asked to rate the impact and feasibility of addressing statements on a continuous 0 to 100 scale.
The panel generated 98 statements across the 4 anaphylaxis themes: Population Science (29), Basic and Translational Sciences (27), Emergency Department Care/Acute Management (24), and Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention (18). Median scores for impact and feasibility ranged from 50.0 to 95.0 and from 40.0 to 90.0, respectively. Key statements based on median rating for impact/feasibility included the need to refine anaphylaxis diagnostic criteria, identify reliable diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic anaphylaxis bioassays, develop clinical prediction models to standardize postanaphylaxis observation periods and hospitalization criteria, and determine immunotherapy best practices.
We identified and systematically appraised anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities. This study reinforces the need to harmonize scientific pursuits to optimize the outcomes of patients with and at risk of anaphylaxis.
尽管人们对过敏反应患者的流行病学、发病机制和管理有了更好的了解,但仍存在知识空白。列举和优先考虑这些空白将使有限的科学资源能够更有效地发挥作用。
我们旨在系统地描述和评估过敏反应知识空白,并根据其潜在影响和可行性确定未来的研究重点。
我们召集了一个由 25 名过敏反应专家组成的多学科小组。小组成员在匿名电子调查中提出了知识空白/研究重点声明。成立了四个过敏反应主题写作小组来完善声明:(1)人群科学,(2)基础和转化科学,(3)急诊科护理/急性管理,和(4)长期管理策略和预防。修订后的声明被纳入匿名电子调查,小组成员被要求对解决声明的影响和可行性进行评分,分值范围为 0 至 100。
该小组在 4 个过敏反应主题中生成了 98 个声明:人群科学(29)、基础和转化科学(27)、急诊科护理/急性管理(24)和长期管理策略和预防(18)。影响和可行性的中位数评分范围分别为 50.0 至 95.0 和 40.0 至 90.0。基于影响/可行性中位数评分的关键声明包括需要细化过敏反应诊断标准、确定可靠的诊断、预测和预后过敏反应生物标志物、开发临床预测模型以标准化过敏反应后观察期和住院标准,以及确定免疫治疗的最佳实践。
我们确定并系统地评估了过敏反应的知识空白和未来的研究重点。这项研究强调需要协调科学研究,以优化过敏反应患者和有过敏风险的患者的结局。