Suppr超能文献

过敏反应知识差距和未来研究重点:共识报告。

Anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities: A consensus report.

机构信息

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, and the Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio.

出版信息

J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;149(3):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.035. Epub 2021 Aug 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a better understanding of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management of patients with anaphylaxis, there remain knowledge gaps. Enumerating and prioritizing these gaps would allow limited scientific resources to be directed more effectively.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to systematically describe and appraise anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities based on their potential impact and feasibility.

METHODS

We convened a 25-member multidisciplinary panel of anaphylaxis experts. Panelists formulated knowledge gaps/research priority statements in an anonymous electronic survey. Four anaphylaxis themed writing groups were formed to refine statements: (1) Population Science, (2) Basic and Translational Sciences, (3) Emergency Department Care/Acute Management, and (4) Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention. Revised statements were incorporated into an anonymous electronic survey, and panelists were asked to rate the impact and feasibility of addressing statements on a continuous 0 to 100 scale.

RESULTS

The panel generated 98 statements across the 4 anaphylaxis themes: Population Science (29), Basic and Translational Sciences (27), Emergency Department Care/Acute Management (24), and Long-Term Management Strategies and Prevention (18). Median scores for impact and feasibility ranged from 50.0 to 95.0 and from 40.0 to 90.0, respectively. Key statements based on median rating for impact/feasibility included the need to refine anaphylaxis diagnostic criteria, identify reliable diagnostic, predictive, and prognostic anaphylaxis bioassays, develop clinical prediction models to standardize postanaphylaxis observation periods and hospitalization criteria, and determine immunotherapy best practices.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified and systematically appraised anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities. This study reinforces the need to harmonize scientific pursuits to optimize the outcomes of patients with and at risk of anaphylaxis.

摘要

背景

尽管人们对过敏反应患者的流行病学、发病机制和管理有了更好的了解,但仍存在知识空白。列举和优先考虑这些空白将使有限的科学资源能够更有效地发挥作用。

目的

我们旨在系统地描述和评估过敏反应知识空白,并根据其潜在影响和可行性确定未来的研究重点。

方法

我们召集了一个由 25 名过敏反应专家组成的多学科小组。小组成员在匿名电子调查中提出了知识空白/研究重点声明。成立了四个过敏反应主题写作小组来完善声明:(1)人群科学,(2)基础和转化科学,(3)急诊科护理/急性管理,和(4)长期管理策略和预防。修订后的声明被纳入匿名电子调查,小组成员被要求对解决声明的影响和可行性进行评分,分值范围为 0 至 100。

结果

该小组在 4 个过敏反应主题中生成了 98 个声明:人群科学(29)、基础和转化科学(27)、急诊科护理/急性管理(24)和长期管理策略和预防(18)。影响和可行性的中位数评分范围分别为 50.0 至 95.0 和 40.0 至 90.0。基于影响/可行性中位数评分的关键声明包括需要细化过敏反应诊断标准、确定可靠的诊断、预测和预后过敏反应生物标志物、开发临床预测模型以标准化过敏反应后观察期和住院标准,以及确定免疫治疗的最佳实践。

结论

我们确定并系统地评估了过敏反应的知识空白和未来的研究重点。这项研究强调需要协调科学研究,以优化过敏反应患者和有过敏风险的患者的结局。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3850/8837706/2aedc1339a4e/nihms-1732748-f0001.jpg

相似文献

1
Anaphylaxis knowledge gaps and future research priorities: A consensus report.过敏反应知识差距和未来研究重点:共识报告。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2022 Mar;149(3):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.07.035. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
2
Anaphylaxis: Data Gaps and Research Needs.过敏反应:数据缺口与研究需求。
Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2022 Feb;42(1):187-200. doi: 10.1016/j.iac.2021.10.002.
6
Knowledge gaps in the diagnosis and management of anaphylaxis.过敏反应诊断和管理方面的知识差距。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Aug;131(2):151-169. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.05.010. Epub 2023 May 19.
7
Anaphylaxis: diagnostic criteria and epidemiology.过敏反应:诊断标准和流行病学。
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2013 Mar-Apr;34(2):115-9. doi: 10.2500/aap.2013.34.3630.
10
Anaphylaxis viewed by experts: unmet needs.专家视角下的过敏反应:未满足的需求。
Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Oct 1;21(5):435-441. doi: 10.1097/ACI.0000000000000771.

引用本文的文献

1
Lactate in Anaphylaxis: 100 Years On.过敏反应中的乳酸:百年回顾。
Sports Med. 2025 Jul 24. doi: 10.1007/s40279-025-02273-8.
6
Epinephrine and anaphylaxis outcomes: Does timing matter?肾上腺素与过敏反应结局:时机重要吗?
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2024 Nov;133(5):501-502. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2024.08.029.
10
How to define severity: A review of allergic reaction severity scoring systems.如何定义严重程度:过敏反应严重程度评分系统综述。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2023 Aug;131(2):170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2023.05.009. Epub 2023 May 19.

本文引用的文献

2
Anaphylaxis-moving beyond severity….过敏反应——超越严重程度……
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Jul;148(1):83-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.04.017. Epub 2021 Apr 23.
3
Evidence update for the treatment of anaphylaxis.过敏反应治疗的证据更新
Resuscitation. 2021 Apr 23;163:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.04.010.
4
Non-IgE-mediated anaphylaxis.非 IgE 介导的过敏反应。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2021 Apr;147(4):1123-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2021.02.012.
5
The Genetic Basis and Clinical Impact of Hereditary Alpha-Tryptasemia.遗传性α-胰蛋白酶血症的遗传基础和临床影响。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 Jun;9(6):2235-2242. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.03.005. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
6
An Approach to the Office-Based Practice of Food Oral Immunotherapy.食物口服免疫治疗的门诊实践方法。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2021 May;9(5):1826-1838.e8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2021.02.046. Epub 2021 Mar 5.
9
World allergy organization anaphylaxis guidance 2020.世界过敏组织2020年过敏反应指南
World Allergy Organ J. 2020 Oct 30;13(10):100472. doi: 10.1016/j.waojou.2020.100472. eCollection 2020 Oct.
10
Trends in US hospitalizations for anaphylaxis among infants and toddlers: 2006 to 2015.2006年至2015年美国婴幼儿过敏反应住院情况趋势
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2021 Feb;126(2):168-174.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2020.09.003. Epub 2020 Sep 8.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验