• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于腺样体切除术的在线信息的可读性和可靠性。

The readability and reliability of online information about adenoidectomy.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head & Neck Surgery, Waikato District Health Board, Hamilton, New Zealand.

Department of Surgery, Waikato Clinical Campus, The University of Auckland, New Zealand.

出版信息

J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Nov;135(11):976-980. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121002164. Epub 2021 Aug 16.

DOI:10.1017/S0022215121002164
PMID:34392845
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is limited understanding amongst patients and parents of paediatric patients regarding adenoidectomy. Most patients access health-related information online. The aim of this study was to assess the suitability of online information on adenoidectomy.

METHOD

The term 'adenoid' was used to search Google, and the first 50 websites identified were screened. For each website, the readability and quality were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 41 websites that met the inclusion criteria, the mean readability scores corresponded to 'difficult to read' and university-level reading categories. For the quality of the websites, the mean score corresponded to 'fair' with 39 per cent of the websites containing either 'poor' or 'very poor' quality data. The ENT UK information is one of the most readable and reliable online resources.

CONCLUSION

The online information on adenoidectomy is largely set at an inappropriate readability level and of variable quality. Surgeons should consider assisting their patients with online searches regarding adenoidectomy.

摘要

目的

患儿及其家长对腺样体切除术的了解有限。大多数患者通过互联网获取健康相关信息。本研究旨在评估腺样体切除术相关在线信息的适宜性。

方法

使用“adenoid”一词在谷歌上进行搜索,并筛选出前 50 个识别出的网站。对每个网站的可读性和质量进行评估。

结果

在符合纳入标准的 41 个网站中,平均可读性评分对应于“难以阅读”和大学阅读水平。就网站质量而言,平均得分为“中等”,其中 39%的网站包含“差”或“非常差”质量的数据。ENT UK 信息是最易读和最可靠的在线资源之一。

结论

腺样体切除术的在线信息在很大程度上设置在不合适的可读性水平和可变的质量上。外科医生应考虑协助患者进行腺样体切除术的在线搜索。

相似文献

1
The readability and reliability of online information about adenoidectomy.关于腺样体切除术的在线信息的可读性和可靠性。
J Laryngol Otol. 2021 Nov;135(11):976-980. doi: 10.1017/S0022215121002164. Epub 2021 Aug 16.
2
Tinnitus information online - does it ring true?网上的耳鸣信息——可信吗?
J Laryngol Otol. 2018 Nov;132(11):984-989. doi: 10.1017/S0022215118001792. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
3
An evaluation of the readability, quality, and accuracy of online health information regarding the treatment of hypospadias.评估关于尿道下裂治疗的在线健康信息的可读性、质量和准确性。
J Pediatr Urol. 2019 Feb;15(1):40.e1-40.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2018.08.020. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Assessing the quality, reliability and readability of online health information regarding systemic lupus erythematosus.评估关于系统性红斑狼疮的在线健康信息的质量、可靠性和可读性。
Lupus. 2018 Oct;27(12):1911-1917. doi: 10.1177/0961203318793213. Epub 2018 Aug 16.
5
Assessing the Accuracy and Readability of Online Health Information for Patients With Pancreatic Cancer.评估在线胰腺癌患者健康信息的准确性和可读性。
JAMA Surg. 2016 Sep 1;151(9):831-7. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2016.0730.
6
Glioblastoma: assessment of the readability and reliability of online information.胶质母细胞瘤:在线信息可读性和可靠性的评估。
Br J Neurosurg. 2021 Oct;35(5):551-554. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2021.1905772. Epub 2021 Mar 26.
7
Web-based information on the treatment of oral leukoplakia - quality and readability.基于网络的口腔白斑治疗信息——质量与可读性。
J Oral Pathol Med. 2016 Sep;45(8):617-20. doi: 10.1111/jop.12459. Epub 2016 May 28.
8
Quality and readability assessment of websites related to recurrent respiratory papillomatosis.与复发性呼吸道乳头状瘤病相关网站的质量和可读性评估
Laryngoscope. 2017 Oct;127(10):2293-2297. doi: 10.1002/lary.26521. Epub 2017 Feb 24.
9
The Quality, Readability, Completeness, and Accuracy of PTSD Websites for Firefighters.消防人员创伤后应激障碍网站的质量、可读性、完整性和准确性。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Oct 19;17(20):7629. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17207629.
10
Breast reconstruction post mastectomy- Let's Google it. Accessibility, readability and quality of online information.乳房切除术后乳房重建——让我们在谷歌上搜索一下。在线信息的可及性、可读性和质量。
Breast. 2017 Apr;32:126-129. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2017.01.019. Epub 2017 Feb 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Online Health Education About Sialendoscopy: A Study on Readability and Reliability.关于唾液腺内镜检查的在线健康教育:可读性与可靠性研究
OTO Open. 2025 Apr 25;9(2):e70117. doi: 10.1002/oto2.70117. eCollection 2025 Apr-Jun.
2
The quality and readability of patient information provided by ChatGPT: can AI reliably explain common ENT operations?ChatGPT 提供的患者信息的质量和可读性:人工智能能可靠地解释常见的耳鼻喉科手术吗?
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2024 Nov;281(11):6147-6153. doi: 10.1007/s00405-024-08598-w. Epub 2024 Mar 26.
3
Patient and Caregiver Perception of Adenoidectomies: A Non-Real-World Social Media Analysis.
患者及照料者对腺样体切除术的认知:一项非真实世界的社交媒体分析
OTO Open. 2024 Jan 25;8(1):e100. doi: 10.1002/oto2.100. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.
4
The readability of online patient education materials on maxillomandibular advancement surgery.在线颌骨前徙手术患者教育材料的可读性。
Sleep Breath. 2024 May;28(2):745-751. doi: 10.1007/s11325-023-02952-8. Epub 2023 Dec 7.
5
An Exploratory Analysis of the Chronic Rhinosinusitis Online Support Community.慢性鼻窦炎在线支持社区的探索性分析
OTO Open. 2023 Nov 7;7(4):e88. doi: 10.1002/oto2.88. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
6
Quality Assessment of Online Resources for Gender-affirming Surgery.性别肯定手术在线资源的质量评估
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2023 Oct 9;11(10):e5306. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005306. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
WeChat official accounts' posts on medication use of 251 community healthcare centers in Shanghai, China: content analysis and quality assessment.中国上海251家社区卫生服务中心微信公众号用药相关推文:内容分析与质量评估
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Jun 12;10:1155428. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1155428. eCollection 2023.
8
Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: assessing the readability and quality of online information.功能性内镜鼻窦手术:评估在线信息的可读性和质量。
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2023 Sep;105(7):639-644. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2022.0123. Epub 2022 Nov 14.