Mental mHealth Laboratory, Department of Sports and Sports Science, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT), Karlsruhe, GERMANY.
Priority Research Centre for Physical Activity and Nutrition, University of Newcastle, AUSTRALIA.
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2020 Feb;52(2):457-465. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002132.
Experimental evidence shows that breaking-up sedentary behavior is positively associated with positive mental health outcomes. However, whether sedentary breaks influence mood in everyday life is largely unknown. Moreover, it is unclear which break patterns are most beneficial to enhance mood.
To investigate the degree to which sedentary break patterns influence mood dimensions in everyday life, we conducted an Ecological Momentary Assessment study in 92 university employees over 5 d. We continuously measured physical behavior (physical activity and sedentary behavior) objectively via accelerometers and assessed mood 10 times a day on smartphone diaries. We defined distinct break patterns, such as variations in frequency (number of breaks), duration (length of breaks), intensity (metabolic equivalent), and context (home or work) and used multilevel modeling to analyze the within-subject effects of sedentary break patterns on mood.
Break intensity was positively associated with subsequent valence (P < 0.01), energetic arousal (P < 0.01), and calmness (P < 0.05). Break frequency was positively associated with subsequent valence and energetic arousal (all P's < 0.01), but break duration was not associated with mood. Exploratory analyses indicated that breaking-up sedentary behavior was more beneficial at home than at work.
These ecologically valid findings suggest breaking-up sedentary behavior as a promising strategy to enhance mood in everyday life. In particular, breaking-up sedentary behavior frequently and intensively, for example, by walking instead of standing, may be most beneficial. We call for future studies to substantiate these accounts and to identify both practical and optimal break patterns among different samples. This evidence informs official public health recommendations aiming to "minimize sedentary time in everyday life."
实验证据表明,打破久坐行为与积极的心理健康结果呈正相关。然而,在日常生活中,久坐休息是否会影响情绪还知之甚少。此外,哪种休息模式最有利于改善情绪也不清楚。
为了研究久坐休息模式在日常生活中对情绪维度的影响程度,我们在 92 名大学员工中进行了为期 5 天的生态瞬时评估研究。我们通过加速度计客观地连续测量身体活动和久坐行为,并通过智能手机日记每天 10 次评估情绪。我们定义了不同的休息模式,如频率(休息次数)、持续时间(休息时间)、强度(代谢当量)和环境(家庭或工作)的变化,并使用多层次模型分析了久坐休息模式对情绪的个体内影响。
休息强度与随后的正性情绪(P<0.01)、精力充沛(P<0.01)和平静(P<0.05)呈正相关。休息频率与随后的正性情绪和精力充沛呈正相关(均 P<0.01),但休息时间与情绪无关。探索性分析表明,在家庭中打破久坐行为比在工作中更有益。
这些具有生态效度的发现表明,打破久坐行为是一种在日常生活中改善情绪的有前途的策略。特别是,例如通过步行而不是站立来频繁和高强度地打破久坐行为可能是最有益的。我们呼吁未来的研究来证实这些说法,并在不同的样本中确定实用和最佳的休息模式。这些证据为旨在“减少日常生活中的久坐时间”的官方公共卫生建议提供了信息。