Suppr超能文献

从业者表示他们如何回答患者有关紫外线防护的问题。

How practitioners say they answer the questions of patients about ultraviolet protection.

机构信息

School of Optometry and Vision Science, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.

Optometry and Vision Science, University of Canberra, Bruce, Australia.

出版信息

Clin Exp Optom. 2022 Aug;105(6):642-648. doi: 10.1080/08164622.2021.1959265. Epub 2021 Aug 17.

Abstract

Patients should be able to rely on optometrists and optical dispensers to provide evidence-based answers to their questions on eye protection, including against ultraviolet radiation. Surveys indicate that there is public concern about the need for protection against ultraviolet radiation, particularly in sunlight. This investigation aimed to evaluate the quality of information provided by practitioners in response to typical questions to which they might reasonably be expected to have ready answers. A cross-sectional study was conducted of on-site responses from attendees of a 3 day optical fair, in Sydney, Australia, in 2017. Subjects were not forewarned about the study. The portion of the questionnaire reported here comprised open answers to four questions intended to represent typical enquiries of patients. The questions were about recommendations for ultraviolet protection in the context of 1) computer use, 2) outdoor use, 3) driving and 4) under office lighting. Eighty-three participants returned completed questionnaires out of 140 issued (61% response). The open-answer question responses were grouped into appropriate, borderline (mostly appropriate but mixed with non-UVR related recommendations) and others (mostly non-UVR related recommendations) and by job title. The proportion of appropriate answers to the four questions were 20%, 30%, 12% and 15%, respectively, which did not differ by job title. A significantly higher proportion of optical dispensers than optometrists selected 'Don't know/no answer' for all questions except office use. Eyecare professionals need to be educated on eye protection against UV radiation to improve the quality of information to be given to the public.

摘要

患者应该能够依赖验光师和配镜师为他们提供有关眼部保护的循证答案,包括对抗紫外线辐射。调查表明,公众对紫外线辐射防护的必要性存在担忧,尤其是在阳光下。本研究旨在评估从业者在回答他们可能合理预期能够回答的典型问题时提供的信息质量。这是一项 2017 年在澳大利亚悉尼举行的为期三天的光学博览会上对现场参与者进行的横断面研究。受试者没有预先了解该研究。本报告中报告的部分包括对四个问题的开放式回答,这些问题旨在代表患者的典型询问。这些问题是关于在 1) 计算机使用、2) 户外使用、3) 驾驶和 4) 办公室照明环境下紫外线保护的建议。140 份问卷中,有 83 份(61%的回应率)被返回了完整的问卷。将开放式问题的回答分为合适、边缘(主要是合适的,但与非 UVR 相关的建议混合)和其他(主要是非 UVR 相关的建议),并按职务进行分组。对这四个问题的回答中,合适的比例分别为 20%、30%、12%和 15%,但按职务分类没有差异。除了在办公室使用的问题外,光学配镜师选择“不知道/没有答案”的比例明显高于验光师。需要对眼保健专业人员进行有关紫外线防护的教育,以提高向公众提供的信息质量。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验