Suppr超能文献

关于治疗灼口综合征患者的系统评价。

A systematic review of treatment for patients with burning mouth syndrome.

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Oral & Craniofacial Science, King's College London, London, UK.

Faculty of Dentistry, The National University of Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2022 Feb;42(2):128-161. doi: 10.1177/03331024211036152. Epub 2021 Aug 18.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Burning mouth syndrome is a chronic idiopathic intractable intraoral dysaesthesia that remains a challenge to clinicians due to its poorly understood pathogenesis and inconsistent response to various treatments.

AIM

This review aimed to study the short- (≤3 months) and long-term (>3 months) effectiveness and sustainable benefit of different burning mouth syndrome treatment strategies and the associated side effects.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Randomised controlled trials of burning mouth syndrome treatment compared with placebo or other interventions with a minimum follow up of 2 months were searched from the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database (published to July 2020).

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies were selected based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria and analysed. Nine categories of burning mouth syndrome treatment were identified: Anticonvulsant and antidepressant agents, phytomedicine and alpha lipoic acid supplements, low-level laser therapy, saliva substitute, transcranial magnetic stimulation, and cognitive behaviour therapy. Cognitive behaviour therapy, topical capsaicin and clonazepam, and laser therapy demonstrated favourable outcome in both short- and long-term assessment. Phytomedicines reported a short-term benefit in pain score reduction. The pooled effect of alpha lipoic acid (ALA) pain score improvement was low, but its positive effects increased in long term assessment.

CONCLUSION

A more significant volume in terms of sample size, multi-centres, and multi-arm comparison of therapeutic agents with placebo and longitudinal follow-up studies is recommended to establish a standardised burning mouth syndrome treatment protocol. Further studies are required to assess the analgesic benefits of topical clonazepam and capsaicin, alternative medicines with neurodegenerative prevention capability and psychology support in treating burning mouth syndrome and reducing systemic adverse drug reactions. International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO):Protocol ID - CRD42020160892.

摘要

背景

灼口综合征是一种慢性特发性、难治性的口腔内感觉异常,由于其发病机制尚未完全明确,且对各种治疗方法的反应不一致,给临床医生带来了挑战。

目的

本综述旨在研究不同灼口综合征治疗策略的短期(≤3 个月)和长期(>3 个月)疗效和可持续获益,以及相关的副作用。

材料和方法

从 PubMed、Embase 和 Cochrane 数据库中检索了与安慰剂或其他干预措施进行比较的灼口综合征治疗的随机对照试验,随访时间至少为 2 个月,并于 2020 年 7 月发布。

结果

根据纳入和排除标准,共选择了 22 项研究进行分析。确定了 9 类灼口综合征治疗方法:抗惊厥和抗抑郁药物、植物药和α-硫辛酸补充剂、低水平激光治疗、唾液替代物、经颅磁刺激和认知行为疗法。认知行为疗法、局部辣椒素和氯硝西泮以及激光治疗在短期和长期评估中均显示出良好的效果。植物药在疼痛评分降低方面显示出短期获益。α-硫辛酸(ALA)改善疼痛评分的汇总效果较低,但在长期评估中其积极作用增加。

结论

建议开展更多样本量更大、多中心、多组药物与安慰剂对照的前瞻性研究,以及纵向随访研究,以建立标准化的灼口综合征治疗方案。需要进一步研究来评估局部氯硝西泮和辣椒素的镇痛效果、具有神经退行性疾病预防能力的替代药物以及心理支持在治疗灼口综合征和减少全身药物不良反应方面的作用。国际前瞻性系统评价注册平台(PROSPERO):注册号 - CRD42020160892。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2208/8793318/dbbd03c0bb29/10.1177_03331024211036152-fig1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验