• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于 PCR 的 SARS-CoV-2 检测之间的差异表明需要重新评估诊断检测方法。

Discrepancy between PCR based SARS-CoV-2 tests suggests the need to re-evaluate diagnostic assays.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Aga Khan University, Karachi, Pakistan.

出版信息

BMC Res Notes. 2021 Aug 17;14(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05722-5.

DOI:10.1186/s13104-021-05722-5
PMID:34404471
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8369441/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

We investigated the discrepancy between clinical and PCR-based diagnosis of COVID-19. We compared results of ten patients with mild to severe COVID-19. Respiratory samples from all cases were tested on the Roche SARS-CoV-2 (Cobas) assay, Filmarray RP2.1 (bioMereiux) and TaqPath™ COVID19 (Thermofisher) PCR assays.

RESULTS

Laboratory records of ten patients with mild to severe COVID-19 were examined. Initially, respiratory samples from the patients were tested as negative on the SARS-CoV-2 Roche assay. Further investigation using the BIOFIRE Filmarray RP2.1 assay identified SARS-CoV-2 as the pathogen in all ten cases. To investigate possible discrepancies between PCR assays, additional testing was conducted using the TaqPath™ COVID19 PCR. Eight of ten samples were positive for SARS-CoV-2 on the TaqPath assay. Further, Spike gene target failures (SGTF) were identified in three of these eight cases. Discrepancy between the three PCR assays could be due to variation in PCR efficiencies of the amplification reactions or, variation at primer binding sites. Strains with SGTF indicate the presence of new SARS-CoV-2 variant strains. Regular modification of gene targets in diagnostic assays may be necessary to maintain robustness and accuracy of SARS-CoV-2 diagnostic assays to avoid reduced case detection, under-surveillance, and missed opportunities for control.

摘要

目的

我们调查了 COVID-19 的临床诊断与基于 PCR 的诊断之间的差异。我们比较了 10 例轻度至重度 COVID-19 患者的结果。所有病例的呼吸道样本均在罗氏 SARS-CoV-2(Cobas)检测、Filmarray RP2.1(bioMeriux)和 TaqPath™ COVID19(Thermofisher)PCR 检测上进行了检测。

结果

对 10 例轻度至重度 COVID-19 患者的实验室记录进行了检查。最初,患者的呼吸道样本在罗氏 SARS-CoV-2 检测上呈阴性。进一步使用 BIOFIRE Filmarray RP2.1 检测发现,所有 10 例均为 SARS-CoV-2 病原体。为了调查 PCR 检测之间可能存在的差异,使用 TaqPath™ COVID19 PCR 进行了额外的检测。10 个样本中有 8 个在 TaqPath 检测上呈 SARS-CoV-2 阳性。此外,在这 8 个病例中的 3 个中鉴定出 Spike 基因靶标失败(SGTF)。这三种 PCR 检测之间的差异可能是由于扩增反应的 PCR 效率不同或引物结合位点的差异造成的。具有 SGTF 的菌株表明存在新的 SARS-CoV-2 变异株。为了保持 SARS-CoV-2 诊断检测的稳健性和准确性,以避免减少病例检测、监测不足和错失控制机会,可能需要定期修改基因靶标。

相似文献

1
Discrepancy between PCR based SARS-CoV-2 tests suggests the need to re-evaluate diagnostic assays.基于 PCR 的 SARS-CoV-2 检测之间的差异表明需要重新评估诊断检测方法。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Aug 17;14(1):316. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05722-5.
2
Evaluation of two RT-PCR screening assays for identifying SARS-CoV-2 variants.评估两种用于识别 SARS-CoV-2 变体的 RT-PCR 筛选检测方法。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Oct;143:104969. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104969. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
3
Clinical evaluation of the BioFire® Respiratory Panel 2.1 and detection of SARS-CoV-2.BioFire(R) 呼吸道Panel 2.1 临床评估及 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Aug;129:104538. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104538. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
4
Comparative Performance Evaluation of FilmArray BioFire RP2.1 and MAScIR 2.0 Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.FilmArray BioFire RP2.1与MAScIR 2.0检测法在检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)方面的性能比较评估
Adv Virol. 2022 Jun 1;2022:4510900. doi: 10.1155/2022/4510900. eCollection 2022.
5
Clinical performance of Roche cobas 6800, Luminex ARIES, MiRXES Fortitude Kit 2.1, Altona RealStar, and Applied Biosystems TaqPath for SARS-CoV-2 detection in nasopharyngeal swabs.罗氏 cobas 6800、Luminex ARIES、MiRXES Fortitude Kit 2.1、Altona RealStar 和 Applied Biosystems TaqPath 用于检测鼻咽拭子中 SARS-CoV-2 的临床性能。
J Med Virol. 2021 Jul;93(7):4603-4607. doi: 10.1002/jmv.26940. Epub 2021 Mar 30.
6
Lack of sensitivity of an IVD/CE-labelled kit targeting the S gene for detection of SARS-CoV-2.针对 SARS-CoV-2 的 S 基因检测的 IVD/CE 标记试剂盒缺乏灵敏度。
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2020 Oct;26(10):1417.e1-1417.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cmi.2020.06.036. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
7
Analytical and Clinical Analysis of Two Automated Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Immunoassays in Pre-Pandemic and Pandemic Patient Populations.在大流行前和大流行期间的患者人群中对两种自动化抗 SARS-CoV-2 免疫分析的分析和临床分析。
J Appl Lab Med. 2021 Mar 1;6(2):441-450. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa204.
8
Head-to-Head Comparison of Two SARS-CoV-2 Serology Assays.两种严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2血清学检测方法的直接比较
J Appl Lab Med. 2020 Nov 1;5(6):1351-1357. doi: 10.1093/jalm/jfaa125.
9
Comparison of SARS-CoV-2 detection from combined nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab samples by a laboratory-developed real-time RT-PCR test and the Roche SARS-CoV-2 assay on a cobas 8800 instrument.比较实验室开发的实时 RT-PCR 检测与罗氏 cobas 8800 仪器上的 SARS-CoV-2 检测试剂盒对鼻咽/口咽联合拭子样本中 SARS-CoV-2 的检测。
J Clin Virol. 2020 Nov;132:104615. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104615. Epub 2020 Sep 4.
10
One swab, two tests: Validation of dual SARS-CoV-2 testing on the Abbott ID NOW™.一拭子,两检测:雅培 ID NOW™ 双重 SARS-CoV-2 检测验证。
J Clin Virol. 2021 Aug;141:104896. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2021.104896. Epub 2021 Jun 12.

引用本文的文献

1
A two-step process for in silico screening to assess the performance of qRTPCR kits against variant strains of SARS-CoV-2.两步法用于计算机筛选,以评估 qRT-PCR 试剂盒针对 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的性能。
BMC Genomics. 2022 Nov 17;23(1):755. doi: 10.1186/s12864-022-08999-3.
2
Dental Care and Education Facing Highly Transmissible SARS-CoV-2 Variants: Prospective Biosafety Setting: Prospective, Single-Arm, Single-Center Study.面对高传染性 SARS-CoV-2 变异株的口腔保健和教育:前瞻性生物安全设置:前瞻性、单臂、单中心研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jun 23;19(13):7693. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19137693.
3
Comparative Performance Evaluation of FilmArray BioFire RP2.1 and MAScIR 2.0 Assays for SARS-CoV-2 Detection.FilmArray BioFire RP2.1与MAScIR 2.0检测法在检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)方面的性能比较评估
Adv Virol. 2022 Jun 1;2022:4510900. doi: 10.1155/2022/4510900. eCollection 2022.
4
SARS-CoV-2 variant with mutations in N gene affecting detection by widely used PCR primers.N 基因发生突变影响广泛使用的 PCR 引物检测的 SARS-CoV-2 变异株。
J Med Virol. 2022 Mar;94(3):1227-1231. doi: 10.1002/jmv.27418. Epub 2021 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Viral Dynamics and Real-Time RT-PCR Ct Values Correlation with Disease Severity in COVID-19.新冠病毒动力学及实时逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)Ct值与COVID-19疾病严重程度的相关性
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jun 15;11(6):1091. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11061091.
2
Molecular diagnostic assays for COVID-19: an overview.用于 COVID-19 的分子诊断检测:概述。
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2021 Sep;58(6):385-398. doi: 10.1080/10408363.2021.1884640. Epub 2021 Feb 17.
3
Two-step strategy for the identification of SARS-CoV-2 variant of concern 202012/01 and other variants with spike deletion H69-V70, France, August to December 2020.2020 年 8 月至 12 月法国用于鉴定 202012/01 关注变异株和其他具有刺突缺失 H69-V70 的变异株的两步策略
Euro Surveill. 2021 Jan;26(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2021.26.3.2100008.
4
A Novel Point Mutation in the N Gene of SARS-CoV-2 May Affect the Detection of the Virus by Reverse Transcription-Quantitative PCR.新型冠状病毒N基因中的一个点突变可能影响逆转录定量PCR对该病毒的检测。
J Clin Microbiol. 2021 Mar 19;59(4). doi: 10.1128/JCM.03278-20.
5
Considerations for diagnostic COVID-19 tests.考虑用于诊断 COVID-19 的检测。
Nat Rev Microbiol. 2021 Mar;19(3):171-183. doi: 10.1038/s41579-020-00461-z. Epub 2020 Oct 14.
6
IFCC Interim Guidelines on Molecular Testing of SARS-CoV-2 Infection.国际临床化学联合会关于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的分子检测临时指南。
Clin Chem Lab Med. 2020 Oct 7;58(12):1993-2000. doi: 10.1515/cclm-2020-1412.
7
Mutations on COVID-19 diagnostic targets.新冠病毒诊断靶标突变。
Genomics. 2020 Nov;112(6):5204-5213. doi: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.09.028. Epub 2020 Sep 20.
8
A Recurrent Mutation at Position 26340 of SARS-CoV-2 Is Associated with Failure of the E Gene Quantitative Reverse Transcription-PCR Utilized in a Commercial Dual-Target Diagnostic Assay.SARS-CoV-2 第 26340 位的一个频发突变与商业双靶标诊断检测中 E 基因定量 RT-PCR 失败相关。
J Clin Microbiol. 2020 Sep 22;58(10). doi: 10.1128/JCM.01598-20.
9
Variation in False-Negative Rate of Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction-Based SARS-CoV-2 Tests by Time Since Exposure.基于时间的暴露后,逆转录聚合酶链反应(RT-PCR)检测 SARS-CoV-2 的假阴性率的变化。
Ann Intern Med. 2020 Aug 18;173(4):262-267. doi: 10.7326/M20-1495. Epub 2020 May 13.
10
Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-time RT-PCR.实时 RT-PCR 检测 2019 新型冠状病毒(2019-nCoV)
Euro Surveill. 2020 Jan;25(3). doi: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.3.2000045.