• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化第二剂 COVID-19 疫苗接种时间可降低 ICU 入院率。

Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions.

机构信息

Instituto de Matemática, Estatística e Computação Científica, Universidade Estadual de Campinas, 13083-859 São Paulo, Brazil.

Instituto de Ciências Matemáticas e Computação, Universidade de São Paulo, 13566-590 São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 31;118(35). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104640118.

DOI:10.1073/pnas.2104640118
PMID:34408076
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8536357/
Abstract

Slower than anticipated, COVID-19 vaccine production and distribution have impaired efforts to curtail the current pandemic. The standard administration schedule for most COVID-19 vaccines currently approved is two doses administered 3 to 4 wk apart. To increase the number of individuals with partial protection, some governments are considering delaying the second vaccine dose. However, the delay duration must take into account crucial factors, such as the degree of protection conferred by a single dose, the anticipated vaccine supply pipeline, and the potential emergence of more virulent COVID-19 variants. To help guide decision-making, we propose here an optimization model based on extended susceptible, exposed, infectious, and removed (SEIR) dynamics that determines the optimal delay duration between the first and second COVID-19 vaccine doses. The model assumes lenient social distancing and uses intensive care unit (ICU) admission as a key metric while selecting the optimal duration between doses vs. the standard 4-wk delay. While epistemic uncertainties apply to the interpretation of simulation outputs, we found that the delay is dependent on the vaccine mechanism of action and first-dose efficacy. For infection-blocking vaccines with first-dose efficacy ≥50%, the model predicts that the second dose can be delayed by ≥8 wk (half of the maximal delay), whereas for symptom-alleviating vaccines, the same delay is recommended only if the first-dose efficacy is ≥70%. Our model predicts that a 12-wk second-dose delay of an infection-blocking vaccine with a first-dose efficacy ≥70% could reduce ICU admissions by 400 people per million over 200 d.

摘要

新冠疫苗的生产和分发速度慢于预期,这削弱了遏制当前大流行的努力。目前批准的大多数新冠疫苗的标准接种方案是间隔 3 到 4 周接种两剂。为了增加部分人群的部分保护,一些政府正在考虑推迟第二剂疫苗的接种。然而,延迟时间必须考虑到一些关键因素,如单剂疫苗提供的保护程度、预期的疫苗供应渠道,以及更具毒性的新冠病毒变异株的出现。为了帮助指导决策,我们在这里提出了一个基于扩展的易感、暴露、感染和清除(SEIR)动力学的优化模型,用于确定第一剂和第二剂新冠疫苗之间的最佳延迟时间。该模型假设宽松的社交距离,并使用重症监护病房(ICU)入院作为关键指标,同时选择最佳的剂量间隔,而不是标准的 4 周延迟。虽然对模拟结果的解释存在认知不确定性,但我们发现延迟时间取决于疫苗的作用机制和第一剂的疗效。对于第一剂疗效≥50%的抗感染疫苗,该模型预测第二剂可以延迟≥8 周(最长延迟的一半),而对于缓解症状的疫苗,只有在第一剂疗效≥70%时,才建议同样的延迟。我们的模型预测,对于第一剂疗效≥70%的抗感染疫苗,如果将第二剂的接种时间推迟 12 周,在 200 天内,每百万人口的 ICU 入院人数将减少 400 人。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/c6c960e613c0/pnas.2104640118fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/a91caf6b6eed/pnas.2104640118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/0fe824266496/pnas.2104640118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/6b0c5247998b/pnas.2104640118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/c6c960e613c0/pnas.2104640118fig04.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/a91caf6b6eed/pnas.2104640118fig01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/0fe824266496/pnas.2104640118fig02.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/6b0c5247998b/pnas.2104640118fig03.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ac1e/8536357/c6c960e613c0/pnas.2104640118fig04.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimized delay of the second COVID-19 vaccine dose reduces ICU admissions.优化第二剂 COVID-19 疫苗接种时间可降低 ICU 入院率。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2021 Aug 31;118(35). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2104640118.
2
Evaluation of COVID-19 vaccination strategies with a delayed second dose.评估第二剂接种时间延迟的 COVID-19 疫苗接种策略。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Apr 21;19(4):e3001211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001211. eCollection 2021 Apr.
3
Public health impact of delaying second dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 covid-19 vaccine: simulation agent based modeling study.延迟接种第二剂BNT162b2或mRNA-1273新冠疫苗对公共卫生的影响:基于模拟代理的建模研究
BMJ. 2021 May 12;373:n1087. doi: 10.1136/bmj.n1087.
4
Heterologous vaccination interventions to reduce pandemic morbidity and mortality: Modeling the US winter 2020 COVID-19 wave.异源疫苗接种干预措施以降低大流行的发病率和死亡率:模拟美国 2020 年冬季 COVID-19 浪潮。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Jan 18;119(3). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2025448119.
5
BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine and correlates of humoral immune responses and dynamics: a prospective, single-centre, longitudinal cohort study in health-care workers.BNT162b2 新冠病毒疫苗与体液免疫应答及动力学的相关性:医护人员前瞻性、单中心、纵向队列研究。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Sep;9(9):999-1009. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(21)00220-4. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
6
Individual preferences for COVID-19 vaccination in China.中国人对 COVID-19 疫苗接种的个体偏好。
Vaccine. 2021 Jan 8;39(2):247-254. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.12.009. Epub 2020 Dec 5.
7
Unfolding the Determinants of COVID-19 Vaccine Acceptance in China.揭示中国民众对新冠病毒疫苗接受度的决定因素。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Jan 15;23(1):e26089. doi: 10.2196/26089.
8
Testing fractional doses of COVID-19 vaccines.测试 COVID-19 疫苗的小剂量。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2022 Feb 22;119(8). doi: 10.1073/pnas.2116932119.
9
Assessing the best time interval between doses in a two-dose vaccination regimen to reduce the number of deaths in an ongoing epidemic of SARS-CoV-2.评估两剂疫苗接种方案中剂量之间的最佳时间间隔,以减少正在流行的SARS-CoV-2疫情中的死亡人数。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2022 Mar 25;18(3):e1009978. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009978. eCollection 2022 Mar.
10
Evaluation of the dose-effect association between the number of doses and duration since the last dose of COVID-19 vaccine, and its efficacy in preventing the disease and reducing disease severity: A single centre, cross-sectional analytical study from India.评估 COVID-19 疫苗接种剂数和末次接种时间间隔与疫苗效果的剂量-效应关系,及其在预防疾病和降低疾病严重程度方面的效果:来自印度的一项单中心、横断面分析研究。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2021 Sep-Oct;15(5):102238. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2021.102238. Epub 2021 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Improved antibody breadth with an extended primary dose interval of COVID-19 vaccine is overcome by boosters.新冠疫苗延长初次接种间隔可提高抗体广度,但这种效果会被加强针所克服。
Front Immunol. 2025 Mar 27;16:1529134. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1529134. eCollection 2025.
2
COVID-19 clinical presentation, management, and epidemiology: a concise compendium.新型冠状病毒肺炎的临床表现、治疗与流行病学:简明概要
Front Public Health. 2025 Jan 31;13:1498445. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1498445. eCollection 2025.
3
Assessing the impact of vaccination and medical resource allocation on infectious disease outbreak management: a case study of COVID-19 in Taiyuan City.

本文引用的文献

1
Optimizing vaccine allocation for COVID-19 vaccines shows the potential role of single-dose vaccination.优化 COVID-19 疫苗的分配显示了单剂疫苗接种的潜在作用。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jun 8;12(1):3449. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-23761-1.
2
Modelling of COVID-19 vaccination strategies and herd immunity, in scenarios of limited and full vaccine supply in NSW, Australia.在澳大利亚新南威尔士州疫苗供应有限和充足的情况下,对 COVID-19 疫苗接种策略和群体免疫的建模。
Vaccine. 2022 Apr 14;40(17):2506-2513. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2021.04.042. Epub 2021 Apr 24.
3
Concerns about SARS-CoV-2 evolution should not hold back efforts to expand vaccination.
评估疫苗接种和医疗资源分配对传染病爆发管理的影响:以太原市 COVID-19 为例。
Front Public Health. 2024 Aug 9;12:1368876. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1368876. eCollection 2024.
4
Bridging the gap between models based on ordinary, delayed, and fractional differentials equations through integral kernels.通过积分核弥合基于常微分方程、延迟微分方程和分数阶微分方程的模型之间的差距。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 May 7;121(19):e2322424121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322424121. Epub 2024 May 2.
5
Predictive models for health outcomes due to SARS-CoV-2, including the effect of vaccination: a systematic review.预测 SARS-CoV-2 导致的健康结果的模型,包括疫苗接种的效果:系统评价。
Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;13(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s13643-023-02411-1.
6
Modeling vaccination strategies with limited early COVID-19 vaccine access in low- and middle-income countries: A case study of Thailand.低收入和中等收入国家早期新冠疫苗供应有限情况下的疫苗接种策略建模:以泰国为例
Infect Dis Model. 2023 Nov 15;8(4):1177-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.idm.2023.11.003. eCollection 2023 Dec.
7
A modeling-based approach to optimize COVID-19 vaccine dosing schedules for improved protection.基于建模的方法优化 COVID-19 疫苗接种方案以提高保护效果。
JCI Insight. 2023 Jul 10;8(13):e169860. doi: 10.1172/jci.insight.169860.
8
Optimizing two-dose vaccine resource allocation to combat a pandemic in the context of limited supply: The case of COVID-19.优化两剂疫苗资源分配以应对有限供应情况下的大流行:以 COVID-19 为例。
Front Public Health. 2023 Apr 24;11:1129183. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1129183. eCollection 2023.
9
Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Policy of Holding the Second Dose of Vaccination: Lessons from the Outbreak in Ho Chi Minh City.评估第二剂疫苗接种政策的有效性:胡志明市疫情的经验教训
Vaccines (Basel). 2023 Jan 29;11(2):293. doi: 10.3390/vaccines11020293.
10
Quantifying the effect of delaying the second COVID-19 vaccine dose in England: a mathematical modelling study.量化延迟在英格兰接种第二剂 COVID-19 疫苗的效果:一项数学建模研究。
Lancet Public Health. 2023 Mar;8(3):e174-e183. doi: 10.1016/S2468-2667(22)00337-1. Epub 2023 Feb 9.
对 SARS-CoV-2 进化的担忧不应阻碍疫苗接种工作的开展。
Nat Rev Immunol. 2021 May;21(5):330-335. doi: 10.1038/s41577-021-00544-9. Epub 2021 Apr 1.
4
Epidemiological and evolutionary considerations of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine dosing regimes.SARS-CoV-2 疫苗接种方案的流行病学和进化考虑。
Science. 2021 Apr 23;372(6540):363-370. doi: 10.1126/science.abg8663. Epub 2021 Mar 9.
5
Single-dose administration and the influence of the timing of the booster dose on immunogenicity and efficacy of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 (AZD1222) vaccine: a pooled analysis of four randomised trials.一剂接种和加强针接种时间对 ChAdOx1 nCoV-19(阿斯利康)疫苗免疫原性和有效性的影响:四项随机试验的 pooled 分析。
Lancet. 2021 Mar 6;397(10277):881-891. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00432-3. Epub 2021 Feb 19.
6
SARS-CoV-2 variants and ending the COVID-19 pandemic.严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2变体与终结2019冠状病毒病大流行
Lancet. 2021 Mar 13;397(10278):952-954. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00370-6. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
7
Vaccine optimization for COVID-19: Who to vaccinate first?2019冠状病毒病疫苗优化:优先接种对象为谁?
Sci Adv. 2021 Feb 3;7(6). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abf1374. Print 2020 Feb.
8
The Case Against Delaying Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) mRNA Vaccine Boosting Doses.反对延迟严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)信使核糖核酸(mRNA)疫苗加强针接种的理由
Clin Infect Dis. 2021 Oct 5;73(7):1321-1323. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciab070.
9
Characterisation of the first 250,000 hospital admissions for COVID-19 in Brazil: a retrospective analysis of nationwide data.巴西 25 万例 COVID-19 住院患者的特征:全国范围内数据的回顾性分析。
Lancet Respir Med. 2021 Apr;9(4):407-418. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30560-9. Epub 2021 Jan 15.
10
An exceptional vaccination policy in exceptional circumstances.特殊情况下的特殊疫苗接种政策。
Lancet Infect Dis. 2021 Feb;21(2):149. doi: 10.1016/S1473-3099(21)00008-6. Epub 2021 Jan 15.