• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Shifting expectations: Lapses in spatial attention are driven by anticipatory attentional shifts.转移期望:空间注意力的疏忽是由预期的注意力转移驱动的。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Oct;83(7):2822-2842. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02354-6. Epub 2021 Aug 25.
2
Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.客体-特征绑定能在空间注意的动态转移中存活。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):343-361. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818481. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
3
Habitual versus goal-driven attention.习惯性注意与目标驱动注意。
Cortex. 2018 May;102:107-120. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2017.06.018. Epub 2017 Jul 4.
4
Explicit attentional goals unlock implicit spatial statistical learning.明确的注意力目标可以解锁隐含的空间统计学习。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2023 Aug;152(8):2125-2137. doi: 10.1037/xge0001368. Epub 2023 Apr 13.
5
Implicit location probability learning does not induce baseline shifts of visuospatial attention.内隐位置概率学习不会引起视空间注意的基线转移。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2019 Apr;26(2):552-558. doi: 10.3758/s13423-019-01588-8.
6
Towards a unified model of vision and attention: Effects of visual landmarks and identity cues on covert and overt attention movements.迈向视觉与注意力的统一模型:视觉地标和身份线索对隐蔽和公开注意力移动的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2018 Mar;44(3):412-432. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000474. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
7
Dynamic neural reconstructions of attended object location and features using EEG.使用 EEG 进行注意物体位置和特征的动态神经重建。
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Jul 1;130(1):139-154. doi: 10.1152/jn.00180.2022. Epub 2023 Jun 7.
8
Neural dynamics of object-based multifocal visual spatial attention and priming: object cueing, useful-field-of-view, and crowding.基于对象的多焦点视觉空间注意和启动的神经动力学:对象提示、有效视场和拥挤。
Cogn Psychol. 2012 Aug;65(1):77-117. doi: 10.1016/j.cogpsych.2012.02.001. Epub 2012 Mar 14.
9
Divided spatial attention and feature-mixing errors.空间注意力分散与特征混合错误。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2015 Nov;77(8):2562-9. doi: 10.3758/s13414-015-0951-0.
10
Target frequency modulates object-based attention.目标频率调节基于对象的注意力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2020 Oct;27(5):981-989. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01746-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic neural reconstructions of attended object location and features using EEG.使用 EEG 进行注意物体位置和特征的动态神经重建。
J Neurophysiol. 2023 Jul 1;130(1):139-154. doi: 10.1152/jn.00180.2022. Epub 2023 Jun 7.

本文引用的文献

1
Prefrontal attentional saccades explore space rhythmically.前额注意扫视有节奏地探索空间。
Nat Commun. 2020 Feb 17;11(1):925. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-14649-7.
2
Real-time triggering reveals concurrent lapses of attention and working memory.实时触发揭示了注意力和工作记忆的同时失误。
Nat Hum Behav. 2019 Aug;3(8):808-816. doi: 10.1038/s41562-019-0606-6. Epub 2019 May 20.
3
Feature-Based Attention Samples Stimuli Rhythmically.基于特征的注意力有节奏地抽样刺激。
Curr Biol. 2019 Feb 18;29(4):693-699.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2019.01.010. Epub 2019 Feb 7.
4
Object-Feature Binding Survives Dynamic Shifts of Spatial Attention.客体-特征绑定能在空间注意的动态转移中存活。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Mar;30(3):343-361. doi: 10.1177/0956797618818481. Epub 2019 Jan 29.
5
A Rhythmic Theory of Attention.注意的节奏理论。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2019 Feb;23(2):87-101. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Dec 24.
6
Attention Cycles.注意周期。
Neuron. 2018 Aug 22;99(4):632-634. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.08.006.
7
Attentional Lapses in Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder: Blank Rather Than Wandering Thoughts.注意缺陷多动障碍中的注意力失误:空白而非漫游思维。
Psychol Sci. 2017 Oct;28(10):1375-1386. doi: 10.1177/0956797617708234. Epub 2017 Aug 11.
8
Forgetting from lapses of sustained attention.因持续性注意力不集中而遗忘。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Apr;25(2):605-611. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1309-5.
9
Serial Dependence across Perception, Attention, and Memory.感知、注意力和记忆中的序列依赖性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Jul;21(7):493-497. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.04.011. Epub 2017 May 23.
10
Confident failures: Lapses of working memory reveal a metacognitive blind spot.自信的失败:工作记忆的失误揭示了一个元认知盲点。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2017 Jul;79(5):1506-1523. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1331-8.

转移期望:空间注意力的疏忽是由预期的注意力转移驱动的。

Shifting expectations: Lapses in spatial attention are driven by anticipatory attentional shifts.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 Oct;83(7):2822-2842. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02354-6. Epub 2021 Aug 25.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-021-02354-6
PMID:34435320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9255260/
Abstract

Attention is dynamic, constantly shifting between different locations - sometimes imperfectly. How do goal-driven expectations impact dynamic spatial attention? A previous study (Dowd & Golomb, Psychological Science, 30(3), 343-361, 2019) explored object-feature binding when covert attention needed to be either maintained at a single location or shifted from one location to another. In addition to revealing feature-binding errors during dynamic shifts of attention, this study unexpectedly found that participants sometimes made correlated errors on trials when they did not have to shift attention, mistakenly reporting the features and location of an object at a different location. The authors posited that these errors represent "spatial lapses" attention, which are perhaps driven by the implicit sampling of other locations in anticipation of having to shift attention. To investigate whether these spatial lapses are indeed anticipatory, we conducted a series of four experiments. We first replicated in Psychological Science, 30(3), the original finding of spatial lapses, and then showed that these spatial lapses were not observed in contexts where participants are not expecting to have to shift attention. We then tested contexts where the direction of attentional shifts was spatially predictable, and found that participants lapse preferentially to more likely shift locations. Finally, we found that spatial lapses do not seem to be driven by explicit knowledge of likely shift locations. Combined, these results suggest that spatial lapses of attention are induced by the implicit anticipation of making an attentional shift, providing further insight into the interplay between implicit expectations, dynamic spatial attention, and visual perception.

摘要

注意力是动态的,会在不同位置之间不断转移——有时并不完美。目标驱动的期望如何影响动态空间注意力?先前的一项研究(Dowd & Golomb,《心理科学》,30(3),343-361,2019)探讨了在需要将注意力保持在单一位置或从一个位置转移到另一个位置时的目标特征绑定。除了在注意力的动态转移中揭示特征绑定错误外,这项研究出人意料地发现,参与者有时在不需要转移注意力的试验中也会犯相关错误,错误地报告了不同位置的物体特征和位置。作者认为这些错误代表了“空间失误”注意力,这可能是由于对必须转移注意力的其他位置的隐含采样所驱动的。为了研究这些空间失误是否确实是预期的,我们进行了一系列四项实验。我们首先在《心理科学》,30(3)中复制了原始的空间失误发现,然后表明在参与者不期望必须转移注意力的情况下不会观察到这些空间失误。然后,我们测试了注意力转移方向在空间上可预测的情境,发现参与者更倾向于失误到更有可能转移的位置。最后,我们发现空间失误似乎不是由对可能转移位置的明确知识驱动的。综上所述,这些结果表明,注意力的空间失误是由对进行注意力转移的隐含期望引起的,这为隐含期望、动态空间注意力和视觉感知之间的相互作用提供了进一步的见解。