Department of Orthopaedics, Royal London Hospital, Whitechapel Road, London, E1 1FR, UK.
Biomechanics Group, Mechanical Engineering Department, Imperial College London, London, SW7 2AZ, UK.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2021 Dec;29(12):3902-3909. doi: 10.1007/s00167-021-06700-x. Epub 2021 Aug 26.
Persistent acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) instability following high grade injuries causes significant symptoms. The importance of horizontal plane stability is increasingly recognised. There is little evidence of the ability of current implant methods to restore native ACJ stability in the vertical and horizontal planes. The purpose of this work was to measure the ability of three implant reconstructions to restore native ACJ stability.
Three groups of nine fresh-frozen shoulders each were mounted into a robotic testing system. The scapula was stationary and the robot displaced the clavicle to measure native anterior, posterior, superior and inferior (A, P, S, I) stability at 50 N force. The ACJ capsule, conoid and trapezoid ligaments were transected and the ACJ was reconstructed using one of three commercially available systems. Two systems (tape loop + screw and tape loop + button) wrapped a tape around the clavicle and coracoid, the third system (sutures + buttons) passed directly through tunnels in the clavicle and coracoid. The stabilities were remeasured. The data for A, P, S, I stability and ranges of A-P and S-I stability were analyzed by ANOVA and repeated-measures Student t tests with Bonferroni correction, to contrast each reconstruction stability versus the native ACJ data for that set of nine specimens, and examined contrasts among the reconstructions.
All three reconstructions restored the range of A-P stability to that of the native ACJ. However, the coracoid loop devices shifted the clavicle anteriorly. For S-I stability, only the sutures + buttons reconstruction did not differ significantly from native ligament restraint.
Only the sutures + buttons reconstruction, that passed directly through tunnels in the clavicle and coracoid, restored all stability measures (A, P, S, I) to the native values, while the tape implants wrapped around the bones anteriorised the clavicle. These findings show differing abilities among reconstructions to restore native stability in horizontal and vertical planes. (300 words).
高等级损伤后持续的肩锁关节(ACJ)不稳定会引起明显的症状。水平稳定性的重要性日益得到认可。目前,关于植入物方法在垂直和水平平面上恢复ACJ 固有稳定性的能力,证据很少。这项工作的目的是测量三种植入物重建方法恢复 ACJ 固有稳定性的能力。
将三组 9 个新鲜冷冻的肩部标本分别安装在机器人测试系统中。肩胛骨固定,机器人移动锁骨以测量 50N 力下的前、后、上和下(A、P、S、I)固有稳定性。切断肩锁关节囊、锥状韧带和梯形韧带,使用三种市售系统之一重建肩锁关节。两种系统(带环+螺钉和带环+纽扣)将带环绕在锁骨和喙突上,第三种系统(缝线+纽扣)直接穿过锁骨和喙突的隧道。重新测量稳定性。通过方差分析和重复测量学生 t 检验(带 Bonferroni 校正)对 A、P、S、I 稳定性和 A-P 和 S-I 稳定性范围的数据进行分析,以对比每种重建稳定性与该组 9 个标本的固有 ACJ 数据,并检查重建之间的对比。
三种重建方法均恢复了 A-P 稳定性范围,接近固有 ACJ。然而,喙突环装置使锁骨向前移位。对于 S-I 稳定性,只有缝线+纽扣重建与固有韧带约束没有显著差异。
只有缝线+纽扣重建,即直接穿过锁骨和喙突的隧道,恢复了所有稳定性测量值(A、P、S、I)到固有值,而带植入物环绕在骨骼上使锁骨向前移位。这些发现表明,在恢复水平和垂直平面固有稳定性方面,重建方法的能力存在差异。(300 字)