Emergency Medicine Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, 00168 Rome, Italy.
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 29;57(8):770. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080770.
The diagnosis and treatment of sepsis have always been a challenge for the physician, especially in critical care setting such as emergency department (ED), and currently sepsis remains one of the major causes of mortality. Although the traditional definition of sepsis based on systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) criteria changed in 2016, replaced by the new criteria of SEPSIS-3 based on organ failure evaluation, early identification and consequent early appropriated therapy remain the primary goal of sepsis treatment. Unfortunately, currently there is a lack of a foolproof system for making early sepsis diagnosis because conventional diagnostic tools like cultures take a long time and are often burdened with false negatives, while molecular techniques require specific equipment and have high costs. In this context, biomarkers, such as C-Reactive Protein (CRP) and Procalcitonin (PCT), are very useful tools to distinguish between normal and pathological conditions, graduate the disease severity, guide treatment, monitor therapeutic responses and predict prognosis. Among the new emerging biomarkers of sepsis, Presepsin (P-SEP) appears to be the most promising. Several studies have shown that P-SEP plasma levels increase during bacterial sepsis and decline in response to appropriate therapy, with sensitivity and specificity values comparable to those of PCT. In neonatal sepsis, P-SEP compared to PCT has been shown to be more effective in diagnosing and guiding therapy. Since in sepsis the P-SEP plasma levels increase before those of PCT and since the current methods available allow measurement of P-SEP plasma levels within 17 min, P-SEP appears a sepsis biomarker particularly suited to the emergency department and critical care.
脓毒症的诊断和治疗一直是临床医生面临的挑战,尤其是在急诊等重症监护环境中,目前脓毒症仍然是导致死亡的主要原因之一。虽然基于全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准的传统脓毒症定义在 2016 年已经改变,取而代之的是基于器官衰竭评估的 SEPSIS-3 新标准,但早期识别和随后的适当治疗仍然是脓毒症治疗的主要目标。不幸的是,目前还没有一种万无一失的系统可以早期诊断脓毒症,因为传统的诊断工具,如培养,需要很长时间,并且经常出现假阴性,而分子技术则需要特定的设备,且成本较高。在这种情况下,生物标志物,如 C 反应蛋白(CRP)和降钙素原(PCT),是区分正常和病理情况、评估疾病严重程度、指导治疗、监测治疗反应和预测预后的非常有用的工具。在新出现的脓毒症生物标志物中,Presepsin(P-SEP)似乎最有前途。多项研究表明,细菌脓毒症期间 P-SEP 血浆水平升高,并在适当治疗后下降,其敏感性和特异性与 PCT 相当。在新生儿脓毒症中,与 PCT 相比,P-SEP 更有效地诊断和指导治疗。由于在脓毒症中,P-SEP 血浆水平在 PCT 之前升高,并且由于目前可用的方法允许在 17 分钟内测量 P-SEP 血浆水平,因此 P-SEP 似乎是一种特别适合急诊和重症监护的脓毒症生物标志物。