• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用机器学习在急诊科分诊阶段预测24小时内的脓毒症。

Prediction of sepsis within 24 hours at the triage stage in emergency departments using machine learning.

作者信息

Xie Jingyuan, Gao Jiandong, Yang Mutian, Zhang Ting, Liu Yecheng, Chen Yutong, Liu Zetong, Mei Qimin, Li Zhimao, Zhu Huadong, Wu Ji

机构信息

Department of Electronic Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

Center for Big Data and Clinical Research, Institute for Precision Medicine, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.

出版信息

World J Emerg Med. 2024;15(5):379-385. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.074.

DOI:10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.074
PMID:39290601
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11402869/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sepsis is one of the main causes of mortality in intensive care units (ICUs). Early prediction is critical for reducing injury. As approximately 36% of sepsis occur within 24 h after emergency department (ED) admission in Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care (MIMIC-IV), a prediction system for the ED triage stage would be helpful. Previous methods such as the quick Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (qSOFA) are more suitable for screening than for prediction in the ED, and we aimed to find a light-weight, convenient prediction method through machine learning.

METHODS

We accessed the MIMIC-IV for sepsis patient data in the EDs. Our dataset comprised demographic information, vital signs, and synthetic features. Extreme Gradient Boosting (XGBoost) was used to predict the risk of developing sepsis within 24 h after ED admission. Additionally, SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) was employed to provide a comprehensive interpretation of the model's results. Ten percent of the patients were randomly selected as the testing set, while the remaining patients were used for training with 10-fold cross-validation.

RESULTS

For 10-fold cross-validation on 14,957 samples, we reached an accuracy of 84.1%±0.3% and an area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of 0.92±0.02. The model achieved similar performance on the testing set of 1,662 patients. SHAP values showed that the five most important features were acuity, arrival transportation, age, shock index, and respiratory rate.

CONCLUSION

Machine learning models such as XGBoost may be used for sepsis prediction using only a small amount of data conveniently collected in the ED triage stage. This may help reduce workload in the ED and warn medical workers against the risk of sepsis in advance.

摘要

背景

脓毒症是重症监护病房(ICU)死亡的主要原因之一。早期预测对于减少伤害至关重要。由于在重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC-IV)中,约36%的脓毒症发生在急诊科(ED)入院后24小时内,因此针对ED分诊阶段的预测系统将很有帮助。先前的方法,如快速序贯器官衰竭评估(qSOFA),更适合在ED中进行筛查而非预测,我们旨在通过机器学习找到一种轻量级、便捷的预测方法。

方法

我们访问了MIMIC-IV以获取ED中脓毒症患者的数据。我们的数据集包括人口统计学信息、生命体征和综合特征。使用极端梯度提升(XGBoost)来预测ED入院后24小时内发生脓毒症的风险。此外,采用SHapley值加法解释(SHAP)对模型结果进行全面解释。随机选择10%的患者作为测试集,其余患者用于10折交叉验证训练。

结果

对于14957个样本的10折交叉验证,我们达到了84.1%±0.3%的准确率和0.92±0.02的受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线下面积。该模型在1662例患者的测试集上表现相似。SHAP值表明,五个最重要的特征是病情严重程度、到达时的交通方式、年龄、休克指数和呼吸频率。

结论

XGBoost等机器学习模型可仅使用在ED分诊阶段方便收集的少量数据用于脓毒症预测。这可能有助于减轻ED的工作量,并提前警告医务人员脓毒症风险。

相似文献

1
Prediction of sepsis within 24 hours at the triage stage in emergency departments using machine learning.利用机器学习在急诊科分诊阶段预测24小时内的脓毒症。
World J Emerg Med. 2024;15(5):379-385. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2024.074.
2
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.
3
Predicting sepsis in-hospital mortality with machine learning: a multi-center study using clinical and inflammatory biomarkers.基于临床和炎症生物标志物的机器学习预测院内脓毒症死亡率:一项多中心研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Mar 6;29(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01756-0.
4
Prediction of sepsis mortality in ICU patients using machine learning methods.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 患者的败血症死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2024 Aug 16;24(1):228. doi: 10.1186/s12911-024-02630-z.
5
Early prediction of mortality at sepsis diagnosis time in critically ill patients by using interpretable machine learning.使用可解释的机器学习技术对重症患者脓毒症诊断时的死亡率进行早期预测。
J Clin Monit Comput. 2024 Apr;38(2):271-279. doi: 10.1007/s10877-023-01108-z. Epub 2023 Dec 27.
6
An interpretable machine learning model for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with sepsis-associated liver injury.用于预测脓毒症相关性肝损伤患者 28 天死亡率的可解释机器学习模型。
PLoS One. 2024 May 20;19(5):e0303469. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0303469. eCollection 2024.
7
[Comparison of machine learning and Logistic regression model in predicting acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: data analysis based on MIMIC-III database].[机器学习与逻辑回归模型在预测心脏手术后急性肾损伤中的比较:基于MIMIC-III数据库的数据分析]
Zhonghua Wei Zhong Bing Ji Jiu Yi Xue. 2022 Nov;34(11):1188-1193. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121430-20210223-00279.
8
Machine learning algorithms for early sepsis detection in the emergency department: A retrospective study.机器学习算法在急诊科早期脓毒症检测中的应用:一项回顾性研究。
Int J Med Inform. 2022 Apr;160:104689. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104689. Epub 2022 Jan 20.
9
Early sepsis mortality prediction model based on interpretable machine learning approach: development and validation study.基于可解释机器学习方法的早期脓毒症死亡率预测模型:开发与验证研究
Intern Emerg Med. 2025 Apr;20(3):909-918. doi: 10.1007/s11739-024-03732-2. Epub 2024 Aug 14.
10
Interpretable Machine Learning for Early Prediction of Prognosis in Sepsis: A Discovery and Validation Study.用于脓毒症预后早期预测的可解释机器学习:一项发现与验证研究。
Infect Dis Ther. 2022 Jun;11(3):1117-1132. doi: 10.1007/s40121-022-00628-6. Epub 2022 Apr 10.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Early Sepsis Prediction: A Scoping Review.用于早期脓毒症预测的机器学习和深度学习模型:一项范围综述
Indian J Crit Care Med. 2025 Jun;29(6):516-524. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10071-24986. Epub 2025 Jun 5.
2
Development of an emergency department length-of-stay prediction model based on machine learning.基于机器学习的急诊科住院时间预测模型的开发。
World J Emerg Med. 2025 May 1;16(3):220-224. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.048.
3
ICU-acquired weakness in critically ill patients at risk of malnutrition: risk factors, biomarkers, and early enteral nutrition impact.危重症患者中存在营养不良风险的ICU获得性肌无力:危险因素、生物标志物及早期肠内营养的影响
World J Emerg Med. 2025;16(1):51-56. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2025.020.

本文引用的文献

1
Application of the Sepsis-3 criteria to describe sepsis epidemiology in the Amsterdam UMCdb intensive care dataset.应用 Sepsis-3 标准来描述阿姆斯特丹 UMCdb 重症监护数据集的脓毒症流行病学。
PLoS One. 2024 Jun 21;19(6):e0304133. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0304133. eCollection 2024.
2
Impact of stress hyperglycemia ratio on mortality in patients with critical acute myocardial infarction: insight from american MIMIC-IV and the chinese CIN-II study.应激性高血糖比值对危重症急性心肌梗死患者死亡率的影响:来自美国 MIMIC-IV 和中国 CIN-II 研究的观察。
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2023 Oct 21;22(1):281. doi: 10.1186/s12933-023-02012-1.
3
Analysis and validation of diagnostic biomarkers and immune cell infiltration characteristics in pediatric sepsis by integrating bioinformatics and machine learning.通过整合生物信息学和机器学习分析和验证儿科脓毒症的诊断生物标志物和免疫细胞浸润特征。
World J Pediatr. 2023 Nov;19(11):1094-1103. doi: 10.1007/s12519-023-00717-7. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
4
Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting survival in patients with acute pancreatitis.急性胰腺炎患者生存预测列线图的开发与验证
World J Emerg Med. 2023;14(1):44-48. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2023.022.
5
MIMIC-IV, a freely accessible electronic health record dataset.MIMIC-IV,一个可自由访问的电子健康记录数据集。
Sci Data. 2023 Jan 3;10(1):1. doi: 10.1038/s41597-022-01899-x.
6
Database-based machine learning in sepsis deserves attention.基于数据库的脓毒症机器学习值得关注。
Intensive Care Med. 2023 Feb;49(2):262-263. doi: 10.1007/s00134-022-06961-1. Epub 2023 Jan 2.
7
Factors driving provider adoption of the TREWS machine learning-based early warning system and its effects on sepsis treatment timing.推动供应商采用 TREWS 基于机器学习的早期预警系统的因素及其对脓毒症治疗时机的影响。
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1447-1454. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01895-z. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
8
Comparison of different versions of the quick sequential organ failure assessment for predicting in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients: A retrospective observational study.不同版本快速序贯器官功能衰竭评估对预测脓毒症患者院内死亡率的比较:一项回顾性观察研究。
World J Emerg Med. 2022;13(2):114-119. doi: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2022.027.
9
Presepsin as Early Marker of Sepsis in Emergency Department: A Narrative Review.降钙素原作为急诊科脓毒症早期标志物:一项叙述性综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Jul 29;57(8):770. doi: 10.3390/medicina57080770.
10
Artificial intelligence in sepsis early prediction and diagnosis using unstructured data in healthcare.人工智能在使用医疗保健中的非结构化数据进行脓毒症早期预测和诊断中的应用。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 29;12(1):711. doi: 10.1038/s41467-021-20910-4.