Ng Caleb C, Sy Aileen, Cunningham Emmett T
Department of Ophthalmology, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, CA, USA.
West Coast Retina Medical Group, 1445 Bush Street, San Francisco, CA, 94109, USA.
J Ophthalmic Inflamm Infect. 2021 Aug 27;11(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s12348-021-00253-3.
To provide a comprehensive review of rituximab use for the treatment of non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation.
Review of literature through January 2021.
Individual data was available for 167 patients with refractory non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation who received treatment with rituximab (RTX). Rituximab was generally utilized as third-line or later treatment (108/149, 72.5%) at a mean of 44.6 months following the diagnosis of orbital inflammation (range = 0 to 360 months; median = 13.7 months). Patients with non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation either received prior treatment with corticosteroids only (27/122, 22.1%), or with one (31/122, 25.4%), two (25/122, 20.5%), or three or more (25/122, 20.5%) corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive agents with or without corticosteroids before initiation of RTX treatment. The rheumatologic protocol (two infusions of 1 gram of RTX separated by 14 days) was utilized most frequently (80/144, 55.6%), followed by the oncologic protocol (four weekly infusions of 375 mg/m RTX; 51/144, 35.4%). Various other off-label regimens were used infrequently (13/144, 9.0%). Rituximab treatments resulted in a positive therapeutic response for the majority of patients with orbital inflammation (146/166, 88.0%). Commonly treated diagnoses included granulomatosis with polyangiitis (99/167, 59.3%), IgG-4 related disease (36/167, 21.6%), and orbital inflammation of indeterminate cause (25/167, 15.0%). No side effects were reported in 83.3% (55/66) of cases. The most common RTX-induced adverse event was an infusion-related temporary exacerbation of orbital disease (4/66, 6.1%), which occurred prior to the routine use of systemic corticosteroids as pre-conditioning.
Overall, RTX appears to be both efficacious and well-tolerated as second- or third-line therapy for patients with non-infectious/non-malignant orbital inflammation.
全面综述利妥昔单抗用于治疗非感染性/非恶性眼眶炎症的情况。
检索截至2021年1月的文献。
167例接受利妥昔单抗(RTX)治疗的难治性非感染性/非恶性眼眶炎症患者的个体数据可用。利妥昔单抗通常作为三线或更晚的治疗(108/149,72.5%),在眼眶炎症诊断后的平均44.6个月(范围=0至360个月;中位数=13.7个月)使用。非感染性/非恶性眼眶炎症患者在开始RTX治疗前,要么仅接受过皮质类固醇治疗(27/122,22.1%),要么接受过一种(31/122,25.4%)、两种(25/122,20.5%)或三种或更多(25/122,20.5%)皮质类固醇节省免疫抑制剂联合或不联合皮质类固醇的治疗。最常采用的是风湿病学方案(两次输注1克RTX,间隔14天)(80/144,55.6%),其次是肿瘤学方案(每周输注4次375mg/m² RTX;51/144,35.4%)。各种其他非标准方案使用较少(13/144,9.0%)。利妥昔单抗治疗使大多数眼眶炎症患者产生了积极的治疗反应(146/166,88.0%)。常见的治疗诊断包括肉芽肿性多血管炎(99/167,59.3%)、IgG-4相关疾病(36/167,21.6%)和病因不明的眼眶炎症(25/167,15.0%)。83.3%(55/66)的病例未报告副作用。最常见的RTX诱导的不良事件是与输注相关的眼眶疾病暂时加重(4/66,6.1%),这发生在常规使用全身皮质类固醇作为预处理之前。
总体而言,对于非感染性/非恶性眼眶炎症患者,RTX作为二线或三线治疗似乎既有效又耐受性良好。