• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

十项人格量表挪威语翻译版的内部一致性和结构效度

Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.

作者信息

Thørrisen Mikkel Magnus, Sadeghi Talieh, Wiers-Jenssen Jannecke

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Prosthetics and Orthotics, Faculty of Health Sciences, OsloMet - Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Public Health, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:723852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. eCollection 2021.

DOI:10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852
PMID:34456829
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8385139/
Abstract

The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) is a validated brief instrument measuring the five-factor model (FFM) personality dimensions, developed for instances where more comprehensive FFM instruments are impractical to use. The TIPI has been translated into several languages, but psychometric properties of the Norwegian version (N-TIPI) have not been systematically explored. This study aimed to explore the psychometric properties of the N-TIPI, in terms of internal consistency and structural validity. In a cross-sectional study, responses on the N-TIPI were collected from 5,009 Norwegian master graduates. Descriptive statistics for the subscales and correlations between subscales were calculated. Internal consistency was assessed with inter-item correlations, Cronbach's α and Spearman-Brown coefficients. Structural validity was explored with principal component analysis, parallel analysis, and visual scree plot inspection. Results for the N-TIPI were compared with those previously reported for the original TIPI as well as the German, French, Spanish, and Portuguese versions. Compared with the original and non-English versions of TIPI, results for N-TIPI showed comparable subscale rank order of means, standard deviations, and pattern of correlations between subscales, as well as inter-item correlations and Cronbach's α. The 10 N-TIPI items were adequately reduced to five components, theoretically corresponding with the FFM personality domains. The N-TIPI demonstrated acceptable internal consistency and satisfactory structural validity. Although further research is warranted, the instrument stands out as feasible when it is essential to minimize participants' response burden in studies that aim to explore personality as one among several concepts or utilize personality traits as covariates.

摘要

十项人格量表(TIPI)是一种经过验证的简短工具,用于测量五因素模型(FFM)人格维度,专为在使用更全面的FFM工具不切实际的情况下而开发。TIPI已被翻译成多种语言,但挪威语版本(N-TIPI)的心理测量特性尚未得到系统探索。本研究旨在从内部一致性和结构效度方面探索N-TIPI的心理测量特性。在一项横断面研究中,收集了5009名挪威硕士毕业生对N-TIPI的回答。计算了各分量表的描述性统计数据以及分量表之间的相关性。通过项目间相关性、克朗巴哈α系数和斯皮尔曼-布朗系数评估内部一致性。通过主成分分析、平行分析和直观碎石图检验探索结构效度。将N-TIPI的结果与先前报告的原始TIPI以及德语、法语、西班牙语和葡萄牙语版本的结果进行了比较。与TIPI的原始版本和非英语版本相比,N-TIPI的结果在分量表均值的排序、标准差、分量表之间的相关模式以及项目间相关性和克朗巴哈α系数方面具有可比性。N-TIPI的10个项目被充分简化为五个成分,理论上与FFM人格领域相对应。N-TIPI表现出可接受的内部一致性和令人满意的结构效度。尽管有必要进行进一步研究,但在旨在将人格作为几个概念之一进行探索或利用人格特质作为协变量的研究中,当必须尽量减轻参与者的回答负担时,该工具显得可行。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470a/8385139/126f77f1c94f/fpsyg-12-723852-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470a/8385139/126f77f1c94f/fpsyg-12-723852-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/470a/8385139/126f77f1c94f/fpsyg-12-723852-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.十项人格量表挪威语翻译版的内部一致性和结构效度
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:723852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. eCollection 2021.
2
The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a scoping review of versions, translations and psychometric properties.十项人格量表(TIPI):关于版本、翻译及心理测量特性的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1202953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202953. eCollection 2023.
3
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students.评估中文版十项人格量表(TIPI)在医科大学生中的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 May 16;15:1247-1258. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. eCollection 2022.
4
Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).人格特质评估简短量表:葡萄牙十项人格量表(TIPI)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.
5
[Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].[克鲁格五因素人格问卷简版(PID-5 BF)法语翻译版的效度验证]
Encephale. 2018 Feb;44(1):9-13. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 28.
6
Item distribution, internal consistency and structural validity of the German language person-centred climate questionnaire - staff version (PCQ-G-S): a cross-sectional study.德语文人本主义气候问卷-员工版(PCQ-G-S)的项目分布、内部一致性和结构有效性:一项横断面研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 12;24(1):57. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04528-3.
7
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
8
[Normative data of middle-aged and older Japanese adults for the the Japanese version of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI-J)].[日本版十项人格量表(TIPI-J)的日本中老年成年人常模数据]
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2018;65(7):356-363. doi: 10.11236/jph.65.7_356.
9
The Turkish Adaptation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.《十项人格量表的土耳其语改编版》
Noro Psikiyatr Ars. 2013 Dec;50(4):312-319. doi: 10.4274/npa.y6128. Epub 2013 Dec 1.
10
Emotion Recognition and the Screening Instrument for Borderline Personality Disorder (SI-Bord): Outcomes and Community-Based Validation.情绪识别与边缘型人格障碍筛查工具(SI-Bord):结果与基于社区的验证
Brain Sci. 2022 Nov 8;12(11):1512. doi: 10.3390/brainsci12111512.

引用本文的文献

1
The Relationship Between the Perceived Personality Traits of Dentists, Dental Anxiety, Negative Stories, and Negative Experiences with Dental Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study.牙医的感知人格特质、牙科焦虑、负面故事与牙科治疗负面经历之间的关系:一项横断面研究。
Dent J (Basel). 2025 Apr 10;13(4):162. doi: 10.3390/dj13040162.
2
Pain Assessment in Oral Medicine through Its Different Dimensions: A Comprehensive Review.口腔医学中疼痛评估的不同维度:一项综述
Dent J (Basel). 2023 Oct 24;11(11):246. doi: 10.3390/dj11110246.
3
Association between Reaction Times in the Joint Simon Task and Personality Traits.

本文引用的文献

1
How personality and policy predict pandemic behavior: Understanding sheltering-in-place in 55 countries at the onset of COVID-19.人格特质和政策如何预测大流行行为:了解 COVID-19 爆发初期 55 个国家的就地避难情况。
Am Psychol. 2021 Jan;76(1):39-49. doi: 10.1037/amp0000740. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
2
Physical measures and biomarker collection in health surveys: Propensity to participate.健康调查中的身体测量和生物标志物采集:参与倾向。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2021 May;17(5):921-929. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2020.07.025. Epub 2020 Aug 5.
3
Are reflective models appropriate for very short scales? Proofs of concept of formative models using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.
联合西蒙任务中的反应时间与人格特质之间的关联。
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 15;13(8):1207. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081207.
4
The Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI): a scoping review of versions, translations and psychometric properties.十项人格量表(TIPI):关于版本、翻译及心理测量特性的范围综述
Front Psychol. 2023 Jun 26;14:1202953. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202953. eCollection 2023.
5
Assessing the Psychometric Properties of the Chinese Version of Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI) Among Medical College Students.评估中文版十项人格量表(TIPI)在医科大学生中的心理测量学特性。
Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2022 May 16;15:1247-1258. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S357913. eCollection 2022.
反思模型是否适用于非常短的量表?使用人格特质问卷的形成性模型的概念验证。
J Pers. 2019 Apr;87(2):363-372. doi: 10.1111/jopy.12395. Epub 2018 Jul 4.
4
Short Scales for the Assessment of Personality Traits: Development and Validation of the Portuguese Ten-Item Personality Inventory (TIPI).人格特质评估简短量表:葡萄牙十项人格量表(TIPI)的编制与验证
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 5;9:461. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00461. eCollection 2018.
5
The relationship between study addiction and work addiction: A cross-cultural longitudinal study.学习成瘾与工作成瘾之间的关系:一项跨文化纵向研究。
J Behav Addict. 2016 Dec;5(4):708-714. doi: 10.1556/2006.5.2016.076. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
6
The Scree Test For The Number Of Factors.因子数量的碎石检验
Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10.
7
The Power of Personality: The Comparative Validity of Personality Traits, Socioeconomic Status, and Cognitive Ability for Predicting Important Life Outcomes.人格的力量:人格特质、社会经济地位和认知能力在预测重要人生结果方面的比较效度
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2007 Dec;2(4):313-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2007.00047.x.
8
The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach, or Spearman-Brown?双项量表的信度:皮尔逊、克伦巴赫还是斯皮尔曼-布朗?
Int J Public Health. 2013 Aug;58(4):637-42. doi: 10.1007/s00038-012-0416-3. Epub 2012 Oct 23.
9
The use of short message service (SMS) among hospitalized coronary patients.住院冠心病患者使用短信服务(SMS)的情况。
Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2012 Jul-Aug;34(4):390-7. doi: 10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2012.03.006. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
10
Response burden and questionnaire length: is shorter better? A review and meta-analysis.应答负担和问卷长度:更短是否更好?综述和荟萃分析。
Value Health. 2011 Dec;14(8):1101-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.06.003. Epub 2011 Aug 2.