• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联合西蒙任务中的反应时间与人格特质之间的关联。

Association between Reaction Times in the Joint Simon Task and Personality Traits.

作者信息

Irie Shun, Tachibana Atsumichi, Matsuo Akiko

机构信息

Division for Smart Healthcare Research, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan.

Department of Anatomy, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi 321-0293, Japan.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 15;13(8):1207. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081207.

DOI:10.3390/brainsci13081207
PMID:37626563
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10452160/
Abstract

Joint go and no-go effects (joint Simon effects; JSEs) are considered to have a stimulus-response compatibility effect on joint reaction time tasks (joint Simon task) caused by the presence of other people. Additionally, JSEs are known to be associated with various social factors and are therefore a potential clinical marker for communicative function; however, the relationship with the personality that is associated with communication skills remains unclear. In this study, we focused on the association between JSE and personality traits. Thirty Japanese participants (fifteen women) were recruited. First, personality trait scores were obtained using the Japanese version of the ten-item personality inventory before the experiment. Second, we measured reaction times in the joint Simon task and single go and no-go tasks with the go signal presented on the congruent and incongruent sides. At last, we analyzed the association between reaction times and personality traits by using Spearman's correlation analysis. As a result, we observed two pairs with significant correlations: JSE and neuroticism and short reaction times in the joint condition and agreeableness. In conclusion, we identified potential psychological markers associated with the joint Simon task. These findings may lead to an additional hypothesis regarding the neurobiological mechanisms of JSEs.

摘要

联合执行与停止效应(联合西蒙效应;JSEs)被认为对由他人在场引起的联合反应时任务(联合西蒙任务)具有刺激-反应兼容性效应。此外,JSEs已知与各种社会因素相关,因此是沟通功能的潜在临床标志物;然而,与沟通技能相关的人格之间的关系仍不清楚。在本研究中,我们关注JSE与人格特质之间的关联。招募了30名日本参与者(15名女性)。首先,在实验前使用日语版的十项人格量表获得人格特质分数。其次,我们在联合西蒙任务以及单执行和停止任务中测量反应时,其中执行信号呈现在一致和不一致的一侧。最后,我们使用斯皮尔曼相关分析来分析反应时与人格特质之间的关联。结果,我们观察到两对具有显著相关性:JSE与神经质以及联合条件下的短反应时与宜人性。总之,我们确定了与联合西蒙任务相关的潜在心理标志物。这些发现可能会引出关于JSEs神经生物学机制的另一个假设。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/10452160/bb0defd72dfb/brainsci-13-01207-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/10452160/04e1dbbdcde3/brainsci-13-01207-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/10452160/bb0defd72dfb/brainsci-13-01207-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/10452160/04e1dbbdcde3/brainsci-13-01207-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b3f/10452160/bb0defd72dfb/brainsci-13-01207-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Association between Reaction Times in the Joint Simon Task and Personality Traits.联合西蒙任务中的反应时间与人格特质之间的关联。
Brain Sci. 2023 Aug 15;13(8):1207. doi: 10.3390/brainsci13081207.
2
Do you really represent my task? Sequential adaptation effects to unexpected events support referential coding for the joint Simon effect.你真的代表我的任务吗?对意外事件的序列适应效应支持联合西蒙效应的参照编码。
Psychol Res. 2016 Jul;80(4):449-63. doi: 10.1007/s00426-015-0664-y. Epub 2015 Apr 2.
3
Inverting the joint Simon effect by intention.意图反转联合西蒙效应。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2012 Oct;19(5):914-20. doi: 10.3758/s13423-012-0283-1.
4
The Multimodal Go-Nogo Simon Effect: Signifying the Relevance of Stimulus Features in the Go-Nogo Simon Paradigm Impacts Event Representations and Task Performance.多模态停止信号西蒙效应:表明在停止信号西蒙范式中刺激特征的相关性对事件表征和任务表现的影响
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 25;9:2011. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02011. eCollection 2018.
5
Whose turn is it anyway? The moderating role of response-execution certainty on the joint Simon effect.到底该谁来?反应执行确定性对联合西蒙效应的调节作用。
Psychol Res. 2019 Jul;83(5):833-841. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0901-7. Epub 2017 Aug 9.
6
Joint Simon effects in extrapersonal space.体外空间中的联合西蒙效应。
J Mot Behav. 2013;45(1):1-5. doi: 10.1080/00222895.2012.746635. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
7
Barriers to success: physical separation optimizes event-file retrieval in shared workspaces.成功的障碍:物理隔离可优化共享工作区中的事件文件检索。
Psychol Res. 2018 Nov;82(6):1158-1176. doi: 10.1007/s00426-017-0886-2. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
8
The Influence of Social and Nonsocial Variables on the Simon Effect.社会和非社会变量对西蒙效应的影响。
Exp Psychol. 2015;62(4):215-31. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000292. Epub 2015 Jan 1.
9
When a Social Experimenter Overwrites Effects of Salient Objects in an Individual Go/No-Go Simon Task - An ERP Study.当社会实验者在个体的简单反应时西蒙任务中覆盖显著物体的效应——一项事件相关电位研究
Front Psychol. 2018 May 17;9:674. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00674. eCollection 2018.
10
Effect of perceived interpersonal closeness on the joint Simon effect in adolescents and adults.感知人际亲近度对青少年和成年人联合西蒙效应的影响。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 22;10(1):18107. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74859-3.

本文引用的文献

1
The relationship between personality and bullying among primary school children: the mediation role of trait emotion intelligence and empathy.小学生的人格与欺凌行为之间的关系:特质情绪智力和同理心的中介作用。
Int J Clin Health Psychol. 2023 Apr-Jun;23(2):100359. doi: 10.1016/j.ijchp.2022.100359. Epub 2022 Nov 26.
2
Towards integrating joint action research: Developmental and evolutionary perspectives on co-representation.迈向联合行动研究的整合:共同表象的发展与进化视角。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2022 Dec;143:104924. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2022.104924. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
3
Mind the context-The relevance of personality for face-to-face and computer-mediated communication.
注意语境——个性对面对面和计算机介导交流的相关性。
PLoS One. 2022 Aug 25;17(8):e0272938. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0272938. eCollection 2022.
4
The Effects of Partner Extraversion and Agreeableness on Trust.伴侣的外向性和宜人性对信任的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2023 Jul;49(7):1028-1042. doi: 10.1177/01461672221086768. Epub 2022 Apr 28.
5
Coordinating Mechanisms Are More Important Than Team Processes for Geographically Dispersed Emergency Dispatch and Paramedic Teams.对于地理上分散的应急调度和护理团队而言,协调机制比团队流程更为重要。
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 8;13:754855. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.754855. eCollection 2022.
6
Courage: A Potential Mediator of the Relationship Between Personality and Social Anxiety.勇气:人格与社交焦虑关系的潜在中介因素
Psychol Stud (Mysore). 2022;67(1):53-62. doi: 10.1007/s12646-022-00641-2. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
7
Autism spectrum disorder and schizophrenia: An updated conceptual review.自闭症谱系障碍与精神分裂症:最新概念综述。
Autism Res. 2022 Mar;15(3):384-412. doi: 10.1002/aur.2659. Epub 2021 Dec 29.
8
Association between personality traits and food stockpiling for disaster.人格特质与灾害食物储备之间的关联。
PLoS One. 2021 Dec 29;16(12):e0259253. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0259253. eCollection 2021.
9
Internal Consistency and Structural Validity of the Norwegian Translation of the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.十项人格量表挪威语翻译版的内部一致性和结构效度
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 11;12:723852. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.723852. eCollection 2021.
10
Assessment of Personality Traits Influencing the Performance of Men in Team Sports in Terms of the Big Five.基于大五人格模型对影响男性团队运动表现的人格特质的评估。
Front Psychol. 2021 May 21;12:679724. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.679724. eCollection 2021.