• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
More Generalizable Models For Sepsis Detection Under Covariate Shift.在协变量移位下用于脓毒症检测的更具泛化能力的模型。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021 May 17;2021:220-228. eCollection 2021.
2
Assessing the effects of data drift on the performance of machine learning models used in clinical sepsis prediction.评估数据漂移对临床脓毒症预测中使用的机器学习模型性能的影响。
Int J Med Inform. 2023 May;173:104930. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2022.104930. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
3
Tensor learning of pointwise mutual information from EHR data for early prediction of sepsis.基于电子健康记录数据的点互信息张量学习用于脓毒症的早期预测。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Jul;134:104430. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104430. Epub 2021 May 7.
4
Using machine learning methods to predict in-hospital mortality of sepsis patients in the ICU.使用机器学习方法预测 ICU 中脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Oct 2;20(1):251. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-01271-2.
5
A Time-Phased Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Care.基于时相的机器学习模型对重症监护中脓毒症的实时预测
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e884-e888. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004494.
6
Machine Learning Models for Analysis of Vital Signs Dynamics: A Case for Sepsis Onset Prediction.用于生命体征动态分析的机器学习模型:脓毒症发作预测案例。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Nov 3;2019:5930379. doi: 10.1155/2019/5930379. eCollection 2019.
7
Information Geometrically Generalized Covariate Shift Adaptation.信息几何广义协变量转移适应
Neural Comput. 2022 Aug 16;34(9):1944-1977. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01526.
8
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.
9
Early Prediction of Sepsis From Clinical Data Using Ratio and Power-Based Features.基于比率和幂律特征的临床数据脓毒症早期预测。
Crit Care Med. 2020 Dec;48(12):e1343-e1349. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004691.
10
HeMA: A hierarchically enriched machine learning approach for managing false alarms in real time: A sepsis prediction case study.HeMA:一种用于实时管理误报的分层丰富机器学习方法:脓毒症预测案例研究。
Comput Biol Med. 2021 Apr;131:104255. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2021.104255. Epub 2021 Feb 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Bias in artificial intelligence algorithms and recommendations for mitigation.人工智能算法中的偏差及缓解建议。
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Jun 22;2(6):e0000278. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000278. eCollection 2023 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Generalization of Machine Learning Approaches to Identify Notifiable Conditions from a Statewide Health Information Exchange.将机器学习方法推广应用于从全州范围的健康信息交换中识别应报告疾病。
AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2020 May 30;2020:152-161. eCollection 2020.
2
Development and Validation of a Deep Learning-Based Automated Detection Algorithm for Major Thoracic Diseases on Chest Radiographs.基于深度学习的胸部 X 线片主要胸部疾病自动检测算法的开发与验证。
JAMA Netw Open. 2019 Mar 1;2(3):e191095. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.1095.
3
Sepsis in Intensive Care Unit Patients: Worldwide Data From the Intensive Care over Nations Audit.重症监护病房患者的脓毒症:来自全球重症监护国家审计的数据分析
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2018 Nov 19;5(12):ofy313. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofy313. eCollection 2018 Dec.
4
The eICU Collaborative Research Database, a freely available multi-center database for critical care research.eICU 协作研究数据库,一个免费的多中心重症监护研究数据库。
Sci Data. 2018 Sep 11;5:180178. doi: 10.1038/sdata.2018.178.
5
Calibration Drift Among Regression and Machine Learning Models for Hospital Mortality.用于医院死亡率的回归模型和机器学习模型中的校准漂移
AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2018 Apr 16;2017:625-634. eCollection 2017.
6
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
7
Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models: Users' Guides to the Medical Literature.临床预测模型的判别与校准:医学文献的使用者指南。
JAMA. 2017 Oct 10;318(14):1377-1384. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126.
8
Calibration drift in regression and machine learning models for acute kidney injury.急性肾损伤回归模型和机器学习模型中的校准漂移
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017 Nov 1;24(6):1052-1061. doi: 10.1093/jamia/ocx030.
9
Diagnosing sepsis is subjective and highly variable: a survey of intensivists using case vignettes.诊断脓毒症具有主观性且差异很大:一项使用病例 vignettes 对重症监护医生进行的调查。
Crit Care. 2016 Apr 6;20:89. doi: 10.1186/s13054-016-1266-9.
10
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.

在协变量移位下用于脓毒症检测的更具泛化能力的模型。

More Generalizable Models For Sepsis Detection Under Covariate Shift.

机构信息

University of Wisconsin, School of Medicine and Public Health.

Saint Louis University, School of Medicine.

出版信息

AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc. 2021 May 17;2021:220-228. eCollection 2021.

PMID:34457136
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8378628/
Abstract

Sepsis is a major cause of mortality in the intensive care units (ICUs). Early intervention of sepsis can improve clinical outcomes for sepsis patients. Machine learning models have been developed for clinical recognition of sepsis. A common assumption of supervised machine learning models is that the covariates in the testing data follow the same distributions as those in the training data. When this assumption is violated (e.g., there is covariate shift), models that performed well for training data could perform badly for testing data. Covariate shift happens when the relationships between covariates and the outcome stay the same, but the marginal distributions of the covariates differ among training and testing data. Covariate shift could make clinical risk prediction model nongeneralizable. In this study, we applied covariate shift corrections onto common machine learning models and have observed that these corrections can help the models be more generalizable under the occurrence of covariate shift when detecting the onset of sepsis.

摘要

败血症是重症监护病房(ICU)患者死亡的主要原因。早期干预败血症可以改善败血症患者的临床预后。已经开发了用于临床识别败血症的机器学习模型。有监督机器学习模型的一个常见假设是,测试数据中的协变量遵循与训练数据中相同的分布。当违反此假设(例如存在协变量偏移)时,在训练数据上表现良好的模型在测试数据上的表现可能会很差。当协变量与结果之间的关系保持不变,但训练数据和测试数据之间的协变量的边缘分布不同时,就会发生协变量偏移。协变量偏移会使临床风险预测模型不可推广。在这项研究中,我们将协变量偏移校正应用于常见的机器学习模型,并观察到这些校正可以帮助模型在发生协变量偏移时更具通用性,从而检测败血症的发生。