• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

用于生命体征动态分析的机器学习模型:脓毒症发作预测案例。

Machine Learning Models for Analysis of Vital Signs Dynamics: A Case for Sepsis Onset Prediction.

机构信息

Department of Industrial Engineering and Management, Afeka Academic College of Engineering, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Department of General Intensive Care and Institute for Nutrition Research, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petah Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

J Healthc Eng. 2019 Nov 3;2019:5930379. doi: 10.1155/2019/5930379. eCollection 2019.

DOI:10.1155/2019/5930379
PMID:31885832
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6925691/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Achieving accurate prediction of sepsis detection moment based on bedside monitor data in the intensive care unit (ICU). A good clinical outcome is more probable when onset is suspected and treated on time, thus early insight of sepsis onset may save lives and reduce costs.

METHODOLOGY

We present a novel approach for feature extraction, which focuses on the hypothesis that unstable patients are more prone to develop sepsis during ICU stay. These features are used in machine learning algorithms to provide a prediction of a patient's likelihood to develop sepsis during ICU stay, hours before it is diagnosed.

RESULTS

Five machine learning algorithms were implemented using R software packages. The algorithms were trained and tested with a set of 4 features which represent the variability in vital signs. These algorithms aimed to calculate a patient's probability to become septic within the next 4 hours, based on recordings from the last 8 hours. The best area under the curve (AUC) was achieved with Support Vector Machine (SVM) with radial basis function, which was 88.38%.

CONCLUSIONS

The high level of predictive accuracy along with the simplicity and availability of input variables present great potential if applied in ICUs. Variability of a patient's vital signs proves to be a good indicator of one's chance to become septic during ICU stay.

摘要

目的

基于重症监护病房(ICU)床边监测数据实现对脓毒症检测时刻的准确预测。如果能及时怀疑并治疗发病,那么患者获得良好临床结局的可能性更大,因此,早期洞察脓毒症的发病情况可能会挽救生命并降低成本。

方法

我们提出了一种新的特征提取方法,其重点假设是不稳定的患者在 ICU 住院期间更容易发生脓毒症。这些特征被用于机器学习算法中,以提供患者在 ICU 住院期间发生脓毒症的可能性预测,即在确诊前数小时进行预测。

结果

使用 R 软件包实现了五种机器学习算法。这些算法使用一组代表生命体征变化的四个特征进行了训练和测试。这些算法旨在根据患者最后 8 小时的记录,计算患者在接下来的 4 小时内发生脓毒症的概率。支持向量机(SVM)和径向基函数的曲线下面积(AUC)最高,达到 88.38%。

结论

如果将其应用于 ICU,那么其高预测准确性以及输入变量的简单性和可用性具有很大的潜力。患者生命体征的变化证明是 ICU 住院期间发生脓毒症的一个很好的指标。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/053c399e4e8e/JHE2019-5930379.alg.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/dd5805ae9fc9/JHE2019-5930379.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/163d084bfb30/JHE2019-5930379.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/7bc82e85f7bd/JHE2019-5930379.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/e7f27471f241/JHE2019-5930379.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/6c9ad4db7d55/JHE2019-5930379.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/14516ad393eb/JHE2019-5930379.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/1906a63dede2/JHE2019-5930379.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/3399ed87a993/JHE2019-5930379.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/053c399e4e8e/JHE2019-5930379.alg.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/dd5805ae9fc9/JHE2019-5930379.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/163d084bfb30/JHE2019-5930379.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/7bc82e85f7bd/JHE2019-5930379.003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/e7f27471f241/JHE2019-5930379.004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/6c9ad4db7d55/JHE2019-5930379.005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/14516ad393eb/JHE2019-5930379.006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/1906a63dede2/JHE2019-5930379.007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/3399ed87a993/JHE2019-5930379.008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1b93/6925691/053c399e4e8e/JHE2019-5930379.alg.001.jpg

相似文献

1
Machine Learning Models for Analysis of Vital Signs Dynamics: A Case for Sepsis Onset Prediction.用于生命体征动态分析的机器学习模型:脓毒症发作预测案例。
J Healthc Eng. 2019 Nov 3;2019:5930379. doi: 10.1155/2019/5930379. eCollection 2019.
2
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
3
A Time-Phased Machine Learning Model for Real-Time Prediction of Sepsis in Critical Care.基于时相的机器学习模型对重症监护中脓毒症的实时预测
Crit Care Med. 2020 Oct;48(10):e884-e888. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000004494.
4
Evaluation of a machine learning algorithm for up to 48-hour advance prediction of sepsis using six vital signs.利用六个生命体征对脓毒症进行长达 48 小时的提前预测的机器学习算法评估。
Comput Biol Med. 2019 Jun;109:79-84. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2019.04.027. Epub 2019 Apr 24.
5
An intelligent warning model for early prediction of cardiac arrest in sepsis patients.脓毒症患者心脏骤停早期预测的智能预警模型。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2019 Sep;178:47-58. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2019.06.010. Epub 2019 Jun 11.
6
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.
7
Machine learning for prediction of septic shock at initial triage in emergency department.机器学习在急诊科初步分诊中预测感染性休克。
J Crit Care. 2020 Feb;55:163-170. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2019.09.024. Epub 2019 Oct 22.
8
Predicting in-hospital mortality in ICU patients with sepsis using gradient boosting decision tree.使用梯度提升决策树预测重症监护病房脓毒症患者的院内死亡率。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 May 14;100(19):e25813. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000025813.
9
A Model-Based Machine Learning Approach to Probing Autonomic Regulation From Nonstationary Vital-Sign Time Series.基于模型的机器学习方法从非平稳生命体征时间序列中探测自主调节
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2018 Jan;22(1):56-66. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2016.2636808. Epub 2016 Dec 7.
10
Predicting the Onset of Sepsis Using Vital Signs Data: A Machine Learning Approach.使用生命体征数据预测脓毒症的发作:一种机器学习方法。
Clin Nurs Res. 2023 Sep;32(7):1000-1009. doi: 10.1177/10547738231183207. Epub 2023 Jun 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A Novel Knowledge Fusion Ensemble for Diagnostic Differentiation of Pediatric Pneumonia and Acute Bronchitis.一种用于小儿肺炎与急性支气管炎诊断鉴别的新型知识融合集成方法。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2025 Sep 6;15(17):2258. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics15172258.
2
Construction and verification of a nomogram model for the risk of death in sepsis patients.脓毒症患者死亡风险列线图模型的构建与验证
Sci Rep. 2025 Feb 11;15(1):5078. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-89442-x.
3
A big data analysis of fever threshold and vital sign characteristics using tympanic temperature in hospitalized patients.

本文引用的文献

1
Heart rate variability based machine learning models for risk prediction of suspected sepsis patients in the emergency department.基于心率变异性的机器学习模型用于急诊科疑似脓毒症患者的风险预测
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(6):e14197. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014197.
2
Multicentre validation of a sepsis prediction algorithm using only vital sign data in the emergency department, general ward and ICU.仅使用生命体征数据在急诊科、普通病房和重症监护病房对脓毒症预测算法进行多中心验证。
BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 26;8(1):e017833. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017833.
3
An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for Accurate Prediction of Sepsis in the ICU.
使用鼓室温度对住院患者的发热阈值和生命体征特征进行大数据分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Nov 10;14(1):27470. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-79080-0.
4
Early detection of sepsis using machine learning algorithms: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.使用机器学习算法早期检测败血症:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 16;11:1491358. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1491358. eCollection 2024.
5
Investigating computational models for diagnosis and prognosis of sepsis based on clinical parameters: Opportunities, challenges, and future research directions.基于临床参数的脓毒症诊断和预后的计算模型研究:机遇、挑战及未来研究方向。
J Intensive Med. 2024 Jul 10;4(4):468-477. doi: 10.1016/j.jointm.2024.04.006. eCollection 2024 Oct.
6
An Integrated Approach: A Hybrid Machine Learning Model for the Classification of Unscheduled Stoppages in a Mining Crushing Line Employing Principal Component Analysis and Artificial Neural Networks.一种综合方法:一种采用主成分分析和人工神经网络的混合机器学习模型,用于对采矿破碎生产线中的非计划停机进行分类。
Sensors (Basel). 2024 Sep 6;24(17):5804. doi: 10.3390/s24175804.
7
Prediction of hospital-acquired influenza using machine learning algorithms: a comparative study.使用机器学习算法预测医院获得性流感:一项比较研究。
BMC Infect Dis. 2024 May 2;24(1):466. doi: 10.1186/s12879-024-09358-1.
8
Parsimonious Waveform-derived Features consisting of Pulse Arrival Time and Heart Rate Variability Predicts the Onset of Septic Shock.由脉搏到达时间和心率变异性组成的简约波形衍生特征可预测脓毒性休克的发作。
Biomed Signal Process Control. 2024 Jun;92. doi: 10.1016/j.bspc.2024.105974. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
9
Predicting sepsis onset in ICU using machine learning models: a systematic review and meta-analysis.利用机器学习模型预测 ICU 中脓毒症的发生:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMC Infect Dis. 2023 Sep 27;23(1):635. doi: 10.1186/s12879-023-08614-0.
10
Machine Learning-Based Early Prediction of Sepsis Using Electronic Health Records: A Systematic Review.基于机器学习利用电子健康记录对脓毒症进行早期预测:一项系统综述
J Clin Med. 2023 Aug 30;12(17):5658. doi: 10.3390/jcm12175658.
一种用于 ICU 中脓毒症准确预测的可解释机器学习模型。
Crit Care Med. 2018 Apr;46(4):547-553. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002936.
4
Physiologically-based, predictive analytics using the heart-rate-to-Systolic-Ratio significantly improves the timeliness and accuracy of sepsis prediction compared to SIRS.与全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)相比,使用心率与收缩压比值的基于生理学的预测分析显著提高了脓毒症预测的及时性和准确性。
Am J Surg. 2017 Apr;213(4):617-621. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2017.01.006. Epub 2017 Jan 7.
5
A computational approach to early sepsis detection.一种早期脓毒症检测的计算方法。
Comput Biol Med. 2016 Jul 1;74:69-73. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2016.05.003. Epub 2016 May 12.
6
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
7
Epileptic Seizure Prediction Based on Multivariate Statistical Process Control of Heart Rate Variability Features.基于心率变异性特征多元统计过程控制的癫痫发作预测
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2016 Jun;63(6):1321-32. doi: 10.1109/TBME.2015.2512276. Epub 2015 Dec 24.
8
Automatic prediction of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events using heart rate variability analysis.使用心率变异性分析自动预测心脑血管事件
PLoS One. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0118504. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118504. eCollection 2015.
9
Diagnostic accuracy and effectiveness of automated electronic sepsis alert systems: A systematic review.自动化电子脓毒症警报系统的诊断准确性和有效性:系统评价。
J Hosp Med. 2015 Jun;10(6):396-402. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2347. Epub 2015 Mar 11.
10
Physiologic variability at the verge of systemic inflammation: multiscale entropy of heart rate variability is affected by very low doses of endotoxin.全身炎症边缘的生理变异性:极低剂量内毒素会影响心率变异性的多尺度熵。
Shock. 2015 Feb;43(2):133-9. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000276.