Suppr超能文献

监测项目的检测与保证方法综述。

A review of testing and assurance methods for surveillance programs.

作者信息

Barlow Alec, Roy Kayla, Hawkins Kristopher, Ankarah Ako A, Rosenthal Benjamin

机构信息

USDA, ARS, NEA, BARC, Animal Parasitic Diseases Laboratory, Beltsville, MD, United States of America.

出版信息

Food Waterborne Parasitol. 2021 Aug 9;24:e00129. doi: 10.1016/j.fawpar.2021.e00129. eCollection 2021 Sep.

Abstract

While global cases of trichinellosis have fallen since pork regulation began, the disease remains a danger to pork and animal game consumers as well as a liability to producers. Managing food safety risk and supporting agricultural trade requires cost-effective and sensitive diagnostic methods. Several means exist to inspect pork for parasitic infections. Here, we review literature concerning the sensitivity, specificity, and cost of these methods. We found that artificial digestion coupled with optical microscopy to be the best method for verification of larva free pork due to its cost efficiency, high specificity, and reliability. Serological techniques such as ELISA are useful for epidemiological surveillance of swine. While current PCR techniques are quick and useful for diagnosing species-specific infections, they are not cost efficient for large-scale testing. However, as PCR techniques, including Lateral Flow- Recombinase Polymerase Amplification (LF-RPA), improve and continue to reduce cost, such methods may ultimately succeed artificial digestion.

摘要

自猪肉监管开始以来,全球旋毛虫病病例有所下降,但这种疾病对猪肉和野味消费者仍然构成威胁,同时也给生产者带来负担。管理食品安全风险和支持农产品贸易需要具有成本效益且灵敏的诊断方法。有多种方法可用于检测猪肉中的寄生虫感染。在此,我们回顾了有关这些方法的敏感性、特异性和成本的文献。我们发现,人工消化结合光学显微镜检查是验证无幼虫猪肉的最佳方法,因为它具有成本效益、高特异性和可靠性。血清学技术如酶联免疫吸附测定(ELISA)对猪的流行病学监测很有用。虽然当前的聚合酶链反应(PCR)技术快速且对诊断特定物种感染有用,但对于大规模检测而言,它们并不具有成本效益。然而,随着包括侧向流动-重组酶聚合酶扩增(LF-RPA)在内的PCR技术不断改进并持续降低成本,此类方法最终可能会取代人工消化法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4110/8379475/0154da709207/ga1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验