Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, and Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut (T.R.F.).
Cancer Prevention Research Center, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island (A.L.P., C.A.R., J.S.R.).
Ann Intern Med. 2021 Nov;174(11):1519-1527. doi: 10.7326/M21-1007. Epub 2021 Aug 31.
Interventions with the potential for broad reach in ambulatory settings are necessary to achieve a life course approach to advance care planning.
To examine the effect of a computer-tailored, behavioral health model-based intervention on the engagement of adults in advance care planning recruited from ambulatory care settings.
Cluster randomized controlled trial with participant-level analysis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03137459).
10 pairs of primary and selected specialty care practices matched on patient sociodemographic information.
English-speaking adults aged 55 years or older; 454 adults at practices randomly assigned to usual care and 455 at practices randomly assigned to intervention.
Brief telephone or web-based assessment generating a mailed, individually tailored feedback report with a stage-matched brochure at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months.
The primary outcome was completion of the following 4 advance care planning activities at 6 months: identifying and communicating with a trusted person about views on quality versus quantity of life, assignment of a health care agent, completion of a living will, and ensuring that the documents are in the medical record-assessed by a blinded interviewer. Secondary outcomes were completion of individual advance care planning activities.
Participants were 64% women and 76% White. The mean age was 68.3 years (SD, 8.3). The predicted probability of completing all advance care planning activities in usual care sites was 8.2% (95% CI, 4.9% to 11.4%) versus 14.1% (CI, 11.0% to 17.2%) in intervention sites (adjusted risk difference, 5.2 percentage points [CI, 1.6 to 8.8 percentage points]). Prespecified subgroup analysis found no statistically significant interactions between the intervention and age, education, or race.
The study was done in a single region and excluded non-English speaking participants. No information was collected about nonparticipants.
A brief, easily delivered, tailored print intervention increased participation in advance care planning in ambulatory care settings.
National Institute of Nursing Research and National Institute of Aging.
在门诊环境中进行具有广泛影响力的干预措施,对于实现全程关怀的预先护理规划方法而言是必要的。
探究基于计算机定制的、行为健康模型为基础的干预措施,对从门诊环境招募而来的成年人参与预先护理规划的影响。
参与者水平分析的聚类随机对照试验。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03137459)。
10 对匹配患者社会人口统计学信息的初级保健和选定专科护理实践。
年龄在 55 岁或以上的讲英语的成年人;在实践中随机分配至常规护理的 454 名成年人和随机分配至干预组的 455 名成年人。
简短的电话或基于网络的评估,生成一份邮寄的、个性化定制的反馈报告,以及一份与阶段匹配的小册子,在基线、2 个月和 4 个月时进行。
主要结局指标为在 6 个月时完成以下 4 项预先护理规划活动:确定并与值得信赖的人沟通对生命质量与数量的看法,指定医疗代理人,完成生前预嘱,并确保文件在医疗记录中——由一名盲法访谈员进行评估。次要结局指标为完成单独的预先护理规划活动。
参与者中 64%为女性,76%为白人。平均年龄为 68.3 岁(标准差,8.3)。在常规护理场所完成所有预先护理规划活动的预测概率为 8.2%(95%CI,4.9%至 11.4%),而在干预场所为 14.1%(CI,11.0%至 17.2%)(调整风险差异,5.2 个百分点[CI,1.6 至 8.8 个百分点])。预设的亚组分析发现,干预措施与年龄、教育程度或种族之间没有统计学显著的交互作用。
该研究仅在一个地区进行,排除了非英语参与者。没有收集非参与者的信息。
简短、易于提供、定制的印刷干预措施增加了门诊环境中预先护理规划的参与度。
美国国立卫生研究院护理研究所以及美国国立老龄化研究所。