Suppr超能文献

STAMP(分享和谈论我的偏好)干预对门诊护理中完成多项预先护理计划活动的效果:一项聚类随机对照试验。

Effect of the STAMP (Sharing and Talking About My Preferences) Intervention on Completing Multiple Advance Care Planning Activities in Ambulatory Care : A Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

机构信息

Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, and Clinical Epidemiology Research Center, VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, Connecticut (T.R.F.).

Cancer Prevention Research Center, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, Rhode Island (A.L.P., C.A.R., J.S.R.).

出版信息

Ann Intern Med. 2021 Nov;174(11):1519-1527. doi: 10.7326/M21-1007. Epub 2021 Aug 31.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Interventions with the potential for broad reach in ambulatory settings are necessary to achieve a life course approach to advance care planning.

OBJECTIVE

To examine the effect of a computer-tailored, behavioral health model-based intervention on the engagement of adults in advance care planning recruited from ambulatory care settings.

DESIGN

Cluster randomized controlled trial with participant-level analysis. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03137459).

SETTING

10 pairs of primary and selected specialty care practices matched on patient sociodemographic information.

PARTICIPANTS

English-speaking adults aged 55 years or older; 454 adults at practices randomly assigned to usual care and 455 at practices randomly assigned to intervention.

INTERVENTION

Brief telephone or web-based assessment generating a mailed, individually tailored feedback report with a stage-matched brochure at baseline, 2 months, and 4 months.

MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was completion of the following 4 advance care planning activities at 6 months: identifying and communicating with a trusted person about views on quality versus quantity of life, assignment of a health care agent, completion of a living will, and ensuring that the documents are in the medical record-assessed by a blinded interviewer. Secondary outcomes were completion of individual advance care planning activities.

RESULTS

Participants were 64% women and 76% White. The mean age was 68.3 years (SD, 8.3). The predicted probability of completing all advance care planning activities in usual care sites was 8.2% (95% CI, 4.9% to 11.4%) versus 14.1% (CI, 11.0% to 17.2%) in intervention sites (adjusted risk difference, 5.2 percentage points [CI, 1.6 to 8.8 percentage points]). Prespecified subgroup analysis found no statistically significant interactions between the intervention and age, education, or race.

LIMITATIONS

The study was done in a single region and excluded non-English speaking participants. No information was collected about nonparticipants.

CONCLUSION

A brief, easily delivered, tailored print intervention increased participation in advance care planning in ambulatory care settings.

PRIMARY FUNDING SOURCE

National Institute of Nursing Research and National Institute of Aging.

摘要

背景

在门诊环境中进行具有广泛影响力的干预措施,对于实现全程关怀的预先护理规划方法而言是必要的。

目的

探究基于计算机定制的、行为健康模型为基础的干预措施,对从门诊环境招募而来的成年人参与预先护理规划的影响。

设计

参与者水平分析的聚类随机对照试验。(ClinicalTrials.gov:NCT03137459)。

设置

10 对匹配患者社会人口统计学信息的初级保健和选定专科护理实践。

参与者

年龄在 55 岁或以上的讲英语的成年人;在实践中随机分配至常规护理的 454 名成年人和随机分配至干预组的 455 名成年人。

干预措施

简短的电话或基于网络的评估,生成一份邮寄的、个性化定制的反馈报告,以及一份与阶段匹配的小册子,在基线、2 个月和 4 个月时进行。

测量指标

主要结局指标为在 6 个月时完成以下 4 项预先护理规划活动:确定并与值得信赖的人沟通对生命质量与数量的看法,指定医疗代理人,完成生前预嘱,并确保文件在医疗记录中——由一名盲法访谈员进行评估。次要结局指标为完成单独的预先护理规划活动。

结果

参与者中 64%为女性,76%为白人。平均年龄为 68.3 岁(标准差,8.3)。在常规护理场所完成所有预先护理规划活动的预测概率为 8.2%(95%CI,4.9%至 11.4%),而在干预场所为 14.1%(CI,11.0%至 17.2%)(调整风险差异,5.2 个百分点[CI,1.6 至 8.8 个百分点])。预设的亚组分析发现,干预措施与年龄、教育程度或种族之间没有统计学显著的交互作用。

局限性

该研究仅在一个地区进行,排除了非英语参与者。没有收集非参与者的信息。

结论

简短、易于提供、定制的印刷干预措施增加了门诊环境中预先护理规划的参与度。

主要资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院护理研究所以及美国国立老龄化研究所。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/0535/8711627/f1e4413e0051/nihms-1754460-f0001.jpg

相似文献

8
Understanding the Role of Knowledge in Advance Care Planning Engagement.理解知识在预先医疗照护计划参与中的作用。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Oct;62(4):778-784. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 13.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

5
Clarifying Core Content of Goals of Care Discussions.明确护理目标讨论的核心内容。
J Gen Intern Med. 2020 Mar;35(3):913-915. doi: 10.1007/s11606-019-05522-5. Epub 2019 Nov 11.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验