Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Yale University (L.I.v.D., T.R.F.), New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Cancer Prevention Research Center, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island (A.P., C.A.R.), Kingston, Rhode Island, USA; Psychology Department, College of Health Sciences, University of Rhode Island (A.P., C.A.R.), Kingston, Rhode Island, USA.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2021 Oct;62(4):778-784. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.02.011. Epub 2021 Feb 13.
Advance care planning remains underutilized. A better understanding of the role of education in promoting engagement is needed.
To examine advance care planning knowledge and its relationship to engagement in middle-aged and older adults.
This cross-sectional study utilized baseline data from 921 participants age ≥55 years enrolled in the STAMP randomized controlled trial, including a knowledge scale consisting of seven questions regarding the purpose and mechanisms of advance care planning and measures of participation.
Only 11.9% of participants answered all 7 questions correctly, and 25.6% of participants answered ≤3 correctly (defined as "low knowledge"). Low knowledge was independently associated with male gender (odds ratio [OR] 2.1, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.5, 3.0), non-white race (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.2), older age (OR 2.2, 95% CI: 1.4, 3.4), lower income (OR 1.5, 95% CI: 1.1, 2.1), and lower education level (OR 2.9, 95% CI: 2.0, 4.1). Higher knowledge was independently associated with communicating with a loved one about quality versus quantity of life (OR 1.7, 95% CI: 1.2, 2.4) and with living will completion (OR 1.6, 95% CI: 1.0, 2.5), but not with healthcare agent assignment. Factors including race and education remained associated with engagement after accounting for knowledge.
Knowledge deficits regarding advance care planning are common and associated with the same sociodemographic factors linked to other healthcare disparities. While improving knowledge is an important component of intervention, it is unlikely sufficient in and of itself to increase engagement.
预先医疗照护计划的实施仍不普遍。需要更好地理解教育在促进参与方面的作用。
检查预先医疗照护计划知识及其与中年和老年人参与之间的关系。
这项横断面研究利用 STAMP 随机对照试验中 921 名年龄≥55 岁的参与者的基线数据,包括一个由七个问题组成的知识量表,这些问题涉及预先医疗照护计划的目的和机制,以及参与度的衡量标准。
只有 11.9%的参与者答对了所有 7 个问题,25.6%的参与者答对了≤3 个(定义为“低知识”)。低知识与男性性别(比值比 [OR] 2.1,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.5,3.0)、非白种人种族(OR 1.5,95% CI:1.1,2.2)、年龄较大(OR 2.2,95% CI:1.4,3.4)、收入较低(OR 1.5,95% CI:1.1,2.1)和教育程度较低(OR 2.9,95% CI:2.0,4.1)独立相关。较高的知识与与亲人就生活质量的数量与质量进行沟通(OR 1.7,95% CI:1.2,2.4)和完成生前遗嘱(OR 1.6,95% CI:1.0,2.5)独立相关,但与医疗代理指定无关。在考虑到知识因素后,种族和教育等因素仍然与参与相关。
关于预先医疗照护计划的知识缺陷很常见,并且与其他医疗保健差异相关的相同社会人口因素有关。虽然提高知识是干预的一个重要组成部分,但它本身不太可能足以增加参与度。