Institute for Evidence in Medicine, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Cochrane Germany, Cochrane Germany Foundation, Freiburg, Germany.
Syst Rev. 2021 Aug 30;10(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s13643-021-01768-5.
Back pain is a widespread health problem that accounts for substantial disability and high costs. The workplace is considered to critically affect the occurrence and persistence of back pain and therefore offers an important opportunity for preventive interventions. Various work-related intervention strategies including both single- and multicomponent interventions have been developed and evaluated so far. To determine their effectiveness, a method of analysis is needed that particularly meets the challenges of the multidimensionality and diversity of these interventions. This planned systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to compare the effects of different work-related interventions for preventing non-specific back pain in people within a formal employment-related context.
We will search the following databases: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Web of Science, CINAHL, PsycINFO, PEDro, SPORTDiscus, and Academic Search Premier from their inception onwards, as well as additional sources. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cluster-RCTs will be considered if they (1) include people within a formal employment-related context, (2) include people without back pain or mixed samples (i.e., people with and without back pain), (3) compare one or more work-related preventive intervention(s) to a control condition, and (4) assess non-specific back pain (incidence or/and pain intensity), ability to work (numbers of participants or/and numbers of days absent from work), intervention-related adverse events or/and self-reported satisfaction with the intervention. Random-effects pairwise meta-analyses and frequentist network meta-analyses will be conducted where appropriate. We will calculate summary effect sizes for each comparison of interventions and rank interventions according to their P scores. If feasible, we will conduct additional component network meta-analyses. We plan to conduct subgroup analyses for job exposure, intervention duration, baseline back pain, different localizations of back pain, and gender. Risk of bias will be assessed using RoB 2 and the certainty of the evidence will be rated using the GRADE approach.
This systematic review aims to identify work-related intervention strategies as well as components within work-related interventions that are effective for preventing back pain. We expect the results to provide guidance for selecting the most promising interventions and foster the purposeful use of resources. Additionally, they may inform the development and implementation of work-related interventions as well as the design of future research in this field.
PROSPERO CRD42021232469.
腰痛是一种广泛存在的健康问题,会导致严重的残疾和高昂的成本。工作场所被认为对腰痛的发生和持续存在具有重要影响,因此为预防干预提供了重要机会。迄今为止,已经开发和评估了各种与工作相关的干预策略,包括单一和多组分干预。为了确定它们的效果,需要一种分析方法,该方法特别要满足这些干预措施的多维性和多样性的挑战。本计划的系统评价和网络荟萃分析旨在比较不同与工作相关的干预措施在预防正式就业相关背景下非特异性腰痛方面的效果。
我们将搜索以下数据库:CENTRAL、MEDLINE、Web of Science、CINAHL、PsycINFO、PEDro、SPORTDiscus 和 Academic Search Premier,从它们的创建开始,以及其他来源。如果随机对照试验(RCT)和群组 RCT 符合以下条件,也将被考虑在内:(1)包括正式就业相关背景下的人群;(2)包括无腰痛或混合样本的人群(即有和没有腰痛的人群);(3)比较一种或多种与工作相关的预防干预措施与对照组;(4)评估非特异性腰痛(发病率或/和疼痛强度)、工作能力(参与者人数或/和缺勤天数)、与干预相关的不良事件或/和对干预的自我报告满意度。在适当的情况下,将进行随机效应成对荟萃分析和频率网络荟萃分析。我们将计算每个干预措施比较的综合效应大小,并根据其 P 评分对干预措施进行排名。如果可行,我们将进行额外的组件网络荟萃分析。我们计划对工作暴露、干预持续时间、基线腰痛、腰痛的不同定位和性别进行亚组分析。使用 RoB 2 评估偏倚风险,并使用 GRADE 方法对证据的确定性进行评级。
本系统评价旨在确定预防腰痛的工作相关干预策略以及工作相关干预措施中的组成部分。我们预计结果将为选择最有前途的干预措施提供指导,并促进有针对性地利用资源。此外,它们可能为工作相关干预措施的制定和实施以及该领域的未来研究提供信息。
PROSPERO CRD42021232469。