Suppr超能文献

家庭隐患消除以降低社区居住老年人跌倒率:一项随机临床试验。

Home Hazard Removal to Reduce Falls Among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

机构信息

Program in Occupational Therapy, Washington University School of Medicine in St Louis, St Louis, Missouri.

Institute of Gerontology, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan.

出版信息

JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Aug 2;4(8):e2122044. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.22044.

Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Falls are the leading preventable cause of morbidity, mortality, and premature institutionalization for community-dwelling older adults.

OBJECTIVE

To test the effectiveness of a behavioral intervention on fall risk among older adults receiving services from an Area Agency on Aging.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This randomized clinical trial examined a home hazard removal intervention in the community using a race- and sex-stratified randomization design. Older adults receiving services from the Area Agency on Aging in urban St Louis, Missouri, were assigned to a home hazard removal intervention delivered over 2 weeks with a 6-month booster or usual care control. Eligible participants were adults aged 65 years or older who did not have dementia, were at high risk for falling, and resided in the community. Enrollment occurred from January 2015 to September 2016; 12-month follow-up occurred from February 2016 to October 2017. Data were analyzed from February 2019 to July 2021.

INTERVENTIONS

The intervention was a home hazard removal program delivered by an occupational therapist in the home that included a comprehensive clinical assessment and a tailored hazard removal plan. Usual care control consisted of annual assessments and community referral.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcome was the hazard of a fall over 12 months. Prespecified secondary outcomes included the rate of falls over 12 months, daily activity performance, falls self-efficacy, and self-reported quality of life.

RESULTS

A total of 310 participants (mean [SD] age, 75 [7.4] years; 229 [74%] women; 161 Black participants [52%]) were randomized, with 155 participants assigned to the intervention and 155 participants assigned to usual care. Retention was 127 participants (82%) in the intervention group and 126 participants (81%) in the control group. There was no difference for our primary outcome of fall hazard (hazard ratio, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.66-1.27). There was a 38% reduction in the rate of falling in the intervention group compared with the control group (relative risk, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.40-0.95; P = .03). At 12 months, the rate of falls per person-year was 1.5 (95% CI, 1.32-1.75) in the intervention group and 2.3 (95% CI, 2.08-2.60) in the control group. There was no difference in daily activity performance (adjusted difference, -0.20; 95% CI, -0.95 to 0.55; P = .60), falls self-efficacy (adjusted difference, -0.12; 95% CI, -1.25 to 1.01; P = .84), or quality of life (adjusted difference, 0.84; 95% CI, -0.95 to 2.64; P = .35).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

This randomized clinical trial found that a brief home hazard removal program did not reduce the hazard of falls among community-dwelling older adults at high risk for falling. The intervention was effective in achieving a reduced rate of falls, a prespecified secondary outcome. This effectiveness study has the potential for delivery through the national aging services network.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02392013.

摘要

重要提示

跌倒对于居住在社区的老年人群体来说是导致发病、死亡和过早入住养老院的首要可预防因素。

目的

测试针对接受老年服务机构服务的老年人的跌倒风险的行为干预措施的有效性。

设计、地点和参与者:本随机临床试验使用按种族和性别分层随机设计,在社区中检验了一项家庭危险消除干预措施。密苏里州圣路易斯市老年服务机构服务的老年人被分配到家庭危险消除干预组,该干预组在 2 周内进行,包括 6 个月的强化治疗或常规护理对照。符合条件的参与者为年龄在 65 岁及以上、没有痴呆症、有跌倒高风险且居住在社区的成年人。2015 年 1 月至 2016 年 9 月期间进行了招募;2016 年 2 月至 2017 年 10 月进行了 12 个月的随访。数据分析于 2019 年 2 月至 2021 年 7 月进行。

干预措施

干预措施是一项由职业治疗师在家庭中进行的家庭危险消除计划,包括全面的临床评估和量身定制的危险消除计划。常规护理对照包括年度评估和社区转介。

主要结果和测量

主要结果是 12 个月内的跌倒危险。预设的次要结果包括 12 个月内的跌倒率、每日活动表现、跌倒自我效能和自我报告的生活质量。

结果

共有 310 名参与者(平均[标准差]年龄,75[7.4]岁;229[74%]名女性;161 名黑人参与者[52%])被随机分组,其中 155 名参与者被分配到干预组,155 名参与者被分配到常规护理组。干预组保留了 127 名参与者(82%),对照组保留了 126 名参与者(81%)。我们的主要结果即跌倒危险没有差异(危险比,0.90;95%置信区间,0.66-1.27)。与对照组相比,干预组的跌倒率降低了 38%(相对风险,0.62;95%置信区间,0.40-0.95;P=0.03)。在 12 个月时,干预组的每人每年跌倒率为 1.5(95%置信区间,1.32-1.75),对照组为 2.3(95%置信区间,2.08-2.60)。每日活动表现无差异(调整差异,-0.20;95%置信区间,-0.95 至 0.55;P=0.60)、跌倒自我效能无差异(调整差异,-0.12;95%置信区间,-1.25 至 1.01;P=0.84)或生活质量无差异(调整差异,0.84;95%置信区间,-0.95 至 2.64;P=0.35)。

结论和相关性

本随机临床试验发现,一项简短的家庭危险消除计划并不能降低有跌倒高风险的居住在社区的老年人的跌倒危险。该干预措施在降低跌倒率方面是有效的,这是一个预设的次要结果。这项有效性研究有可能通过国家老年服务网络进行推广。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02392013。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/46fd/8408671/a0c94f644232/jamanetwopen-e2122044-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验