Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Monash University, 22 Alliance Lane, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) Manufacturing, Research Way, Clayton, Victoria 3168, Australia.
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Monash University, 22 Alliance Lane, Clayton, Victoria 3800, Australia; ReNerve Pty. Ltd., Brunswick East 3057, Australia.
Acta Biomater. 2021 Nov;135:64-86. doi: 10.1016/j.actbio.2021.08.052. Epub 2021 Sep 4.
Commercial nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) for repair of peripheral nerve discontinuities are of little use in gaps larger than 30 mm, and for smaller gaps they often fail to compete with the autografts that they are designed to replace. While recent research to develop new technologies for use in NGCs has produced many advanced designs with seemingly positive functional outcomes in animal models, these advances have not been translated into viable clinical products. While there have been many detailed reviews of the technologies available for creating NGCs, none of these have focussed on the requirements of the commercialisation process which are vital to ensure the translation of a technology from bench to clinic. Consideration of the factors essential for commercial viability, including regulatory clearance, reimbursement processes, manufacturability and scale up, and quality management early in the design process is vital in giving new technologies the best chance at achieving real-world impact. Here we have attempted to summarise the major components to consider during the development of emerging NGC technologies as a guide for those looking to develop new technology in this domain. We also examine a selection of the latest academic developments from the viewpoint of clinical translation, and discuss areas where we believe further work would be most likely to bring new NGC technologies to the clinic. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: NGCs for peripheral nerve repairs represent an adaptable foundation with potential to incorporate modifications to improve nerve regeneration outcomes. In this review we outline the regulatory processes that functionally distinct NGCs may need to address and explore new modifications and the complications that may need to be addressed during the translation process from bench to clinic.
商业性神经引导导管(NGC)在修复周围神经连续性中断方面,对于大于 30mm 的间隙几乎没有作用,而对于较小的间隙,它们往往无法与它们试图替代的自体移植物竞争。虽然最近研究开发的新技术可用于 NGC,在动物模型中产生了许多具有积极功能结果的先进设计,但这些进展尚未转化为可行的临床产品。虽然已经有许多详细的评论介绍了用于创建 NGC 的技术,但没有一个评论集中于商业化过程的要求,而这些要求对于确保技术从实验室到临床的转化至关重要。在设计过程中尽早考虑商业可行性的关键因素,包括监管审批、报销流程、可制造性和扩大规模以及质量管理,对于新技术在现实世界中产生影响至关重要。在这里,我们试图总结新兴 NGC 技术开发过程中需要考虑的主要因素,作为那些希望在这一领域开发新技术的人的指南。我们还从临床转化的角度检查了一些最新的学术进展,并讨论了我们认为在哪些领域进一步工作最有可能将新的 NGC 技术推向临床。意义声明:用于周围神经修复的 NGC 代表了一种适应性强的基础,具有潜在的改良空间,可以改善神经再生的结果。在这篇综述中,我们概述了功能不同的 NGC 可能需要解决的监管流程,并探讨了在从实验室到临床的转化过程中需要解决的新的改良和并发症。