• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Using a community-based participatory research approach to meaningfully engage those with lived experience of diabetes and homelessness.采用基于社区的参与式研究方法,让那些有糖尿病和无家可归经历的人有意义地参与进来。
BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002154.
2
Lessons learned from a virtual Community-Based Participatory Research project: prioritizing needs of people who have diabetes and experiences of homelessness to co-design a participatory action project.从一个基于社区的虚拟参与式研究项目中吸取的经验教训:优先考虑糖尿病患者和无家可归者的需求,共同设计一个参与式行动项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 4;9(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00456-z.
3
I WAS HERE: young mothers who have experienced homelessness use Photovoice and participatory qualitative analysis to demonstrate strengths and assets.我曾在此:经历过无家可归的年轻母亲们运用照片讲述法和参与式定性分析来展现自身优势与资产。
Glob Health Promot. 2015 Mar;22(1):8-20. doi: 10.1177/1757975914528960. Epub 2014 May 15.
4
Using concept mapping to prioritize barriers to diabetes care and self-management for those who experience homelessness.使用概念图确定无家可归者在糖尿病护理和自我管理方面面临的主要障碍。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 9;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01494-3.
5
Group Versus Individual Diabetes Education for Persons With Experience of Homelessness in Canada.加拿大有过流浪经历人群的团体与个体糖尿病教育效果比较。
Sci Diabetes Self Manag Care. 2023 Dec;49(6):415-425. doi: 10.1177/26350106231201365. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
6
"It's not the end of the story:" Understanding the continued recovery from homelessness using Photovoice and content analysis.“故事还未结束”:使用影像叙事和内容分析法理解无家可归者的持续康复。
J Community Psychol. 2021 Jul;49(5):1100-1120. doi: 10.1002/jcop.22605. Epub 2021 May 25.
7
Exploring the experiences of changes to support access to primary health care services and the impact on the quality and safety of care for homeless people during the COVID-19 pandemic: a study protocol for a qualitative mixed methods approach.探索在 COVID-19 大流行期间改变对初级卫生保健服务支持的体验以及对无家可归者护理质量和安全的影响:一项定性混合方法研究方案。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jan 10;20(1):29. doi: 10.1186/s12939-020-01364-4.
8
Assessing community (peer) researcher's experiences with conducting spirometry and being engaged in the 'Participatory Research in Ottawa: Management and Point-of-care for Tobacco-dependence' (PROMPT) project.评估社区(同行)研究人员进行肺活量测定以及参与“渥太华参与式研究:烟草依赖管理与即时护理”(PROMPT)项目的经历。
Res Involv Engagem. 2018 Dec 1;4:43. doi: 10.1186/s40900-018-0125-z. eCollection 2018.
9
The INSCHOOL project: showcasing participatory qualitative methods derived from patient and public involvement and engagement (PPIE) work with young people with long-term health conditions.INSCHOOL项目:展示源自患者及公众参与(PPIE)工作的参与式定性方法,该工作针对患有长期健康状况的年轻人开展。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Oct 12;9(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00496-5.
10
Partnering with Indigenous student co-researchers: improving research processes and outcomes.与原住民学生共同研究者合作:改善研究过程与成果。
Int J Circumpolar Health. 2015 Jul 27;74:27838. doi: 10.3402/ijch.v74.27838. eCollection 2015.

引用本文的文献

1
Complementary medicine among individuals experiencing homelessness in Switzerland: a quantitative and qualitative descriptive study.瑞士无家可归者中的补充医学:一项定量与定性描述性研究。
BMC Complement Med Ther. 2025 May 6;25(1):166. doi: 10.1186/s12906-024-04727-4.
2
Exploring patient perspectives on the impact of resuming cost sharing: a qualitative analysis.探讨患者对恢复成本分担影响的看法:定性分析。
Trials. 2024 Nov 9;25(1):749. doi: 10.1186/s13063-024-08593-w.
3
A stakeholder co-design approach to designing a dental service for adults experiencing homelessness.一种利益相关者共同设计的方法,用于为无家可归的成年人设计牙科服务。
Front Oral Health. 2024 Aug 26;5:1355429. doi: 10.3389/froh.2024.1355429. eCollection 2024.
4
Lessons learned from conducting a community-based, nurse-led HIV prevention trial with youth experiencing homelessness: Pivots and pitfalls.从一项以社区为基础、由护士主导的针对无家可归青年的 HIV 预防试验中吸取的经验教训:转折点和陷阱。
Public Health Nurs. 2024 Jul-Aug;41(4):806-814. doi: 10.1111/phn.13314. Epub 2024 Apr 4.
5
Patient engagement in designing, conducting, and disseminating clinical pain research: IMMPACT recommended considerations.患者参与临床疼痛研究的设计、实施和传播:IMMPACT推荐的考量因素。
Pain. 2024 May 1;165(5):1013-1028. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000003121. Epub 2023 Dec 19.
6
Significance of fostering the mental health of patients with diabetes through critical time intervention.通过关键时期干预促进糖尿病患者心理健康的意义。
World J Clin Cases. 2023 Dec 26;11(36):8486-8497. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i36.8486.
7
Lessons learned from a virtual Community-Based Participatory Research project: prioritizing needs of people who have diabetes and experiences of homelessness to co-design a participatory action project.从一个基于社区的虚拟参与式研究项目中吸取的经验教训:优先考虑糖尿病患者和无家可归者的需求,共同设计一个参与式行动项目。
Res Involv Engagem. 2023 Jul 4;9(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40900-023-00456-z.
8
Integrated approach to cardiovascular disease in people experiencing homelessness: a qualitative study.无家可归者心血管疾病的综合管理:一项定性研究。
Open Heart. 2023 Apr;10(1). doi: 10.1136/openhrt-2022-002235.
9
Pharmacists' role in diabetes management for persons with lived experience of homelessness in Canada: A qualitative study.药剂师在加拿大无家可归者糖尿病管理中的作用:一项定性研究。
Front Clin Diabetes Healthc. 2022 Dec 22;3:1087751. doi: 10.3389/fcdhc.2022.1087751. eCollection 2022.
10
Rethinking patient-oriented research.重新思考以患者为导向的研究。
CMAJ. 2022 Aug 22;194(32):E1119-E1120. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.220536.

本文引用的文献

1
Healthy food prescription incentive programme for adults with type 2 diabetes who are experiencing food insecurity: protocol for a randomised controlled trial, modelling and implementation studies.健康食物处方激励计划用于患有 2 型糖尿病且面临食物不安全的成年人:一项随机对照试验、建模和实施研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2022 Feb 15;12(2):e050006. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-050006.
2
Using concept mapping to prioritize barriers to diabetes care and self-management for those who experience homelessness.使用概念图确定无家可归者在糖尿病护理和自我管理方面面临的主要障碍。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 Jul 9;20(1):158. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01494-3.
3
Identifying homeless population needs in the Emergency Department using Community-Based Participatory Research.运用基于社区的参与式研究确定急诊科无家可归人群的需求。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 May 5;21(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-06426-z.
4
Innovations in Providing Diabetes Care for Individuals Experiencing Homelessness: An Environmental Scan.为无家可归者提供糖尿病护理的创新:环境扫描。
Can J Diabetes. 2020 Oct;44(7):643-650. doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2020.01.011. Epub 2020 Feb 14.
5
How patient and community involvement in diabetes research influences health outcomes: A realist review.患者和社区参与糖尿病研究如何影响健康结果:一个现实主义的综述。
Health Expect. 2019 Oct;22(5):907-920. doi: 10.1111/hex.12935. Epub 2019 Jul 8.
6
No Digital Divide? Technology Use among Homeless Adults.没有数字鸿沟?无家可归成年人的技术使用情况
J Soc Distress Homeless. 2017;26(1):73-77. doi: 10.1080/10530789.2017.1305140. Epub 2017 Mar 22.
7
Community-based participatory research to promote healthy lifestyles among Latino immigrant families with youth with disabilities.基于社区的参与性研究,以促进有残疾青少年的拉丁裔移民家庭的健康生活方式。
Scand J Occup Ther. 2018 Sep;25(5):396-406. doi: 10.1080/11038128.2018.1502348. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
8
Understanding community-based participatory research through a social movement framework: a case study of the Kahnawake Schools Diabetes Prevention Project.通过社会运动框架理解社区参与式研究:以 Kahnawake 学校糖尿病预防项目为例。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 12;18(1):487. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5412-y.
9
Tokenism in patient engagement.患者参与中的表面应付行为
Fam Pract. 2017 Jun 1;34(3):290-295. doi: 10.1093/fampra/cmw097.
10
Engaging patients and consumers in research evidence: Applying the conceptual model of patient and family engagement.让患者和消费者参与研究证据:应用患者及家庭参与的概念模型。
Patient Educ Couns. 2017 Jan;100(1):25-29. doi: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.07.009. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

采用基于社区的参与式研究方法,让那些有糖尿病和无家可归经历的人有意义地参与进来。

Using a community-based participatory research approach to meaningfully engage those with lived experience of diabetes and homelessness.

机构信息

Department of Medicine, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary Cumming School of Medicine, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2021 Sep;9(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002154.

DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2021-002154
PMID:34493497
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8424863/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Participatory research is a study method that engages patients in research programs, ideally from study design through to dissemination. It is not commonly used in diabetes health services research. Our objectives were to describe the process and challenges of conducting a participatory research project and to highlight the experiences of both patient co-researchers and academic researchers.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We recruited people with lived experience of homelessness (PWLEH) and diabetes in Toronto, Canada to become patient co-researchers. They were asked to commit to attending biweekly meetings. We undertook two major research projects: concept mapping to choose a research focus; and photovoice to explore accessing healthy food while homeless. We used a convergent mixed-methods design to evaluate their experience.

RESULTS

A diverse group of eight PWLEH had an average attendance of 82% over 21 meetings-despite this success, we encountered a number of challenges of conducting this research: funding, ethics approval and recruitment were particularly difficult. Group members reported that participation improved their ability to self-advocate in their diabetes care and provided them with tangible skills and social benefits. Group members stated that they valued being involved in all aspects of the research, in particular knowledge translation activities, including advocating for nutritious food at shelters; presenting to stakeholders; and meeting with policymakers.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of participatory research methods enables academic researchers to support community members in pursuing research that is pertinent to them and which has a positive impact. In our study, co-researchers contributed in meaningful ways and also valued the experience.

摘要

简介

参与式研究是一种让患者参与研究项目的研究方法,理想情况下从研究设计到传播都能让患者参与。它在糖尿病健康服务研究中并不常用。我们的目标是描述开展参与式研究项目的过程和挑战,并强调患者共同研究者和学术研究人员的经验。

研究设计和方法

我们在加拿大多伦多招募了有流浪经历(PWLEH)和糖尿病的人成为患者共同研究者。他们被要求承诺参加两周一次的会议。我们进行了两个主要的研究项目:概念图以选择研究重点;以及摄影作品,以探索无家可归者获得健康食品的情况。我们使用了一种收敛混合方法设计来评估他们的经验。

结果

一个由八名 PWLEH 组成的多元化群体平均出席率为 82%,共参加了 21 次会议——尽管取得了这一成功,我们在进行这项研究时遇到了一些挑战:资金、伦理审批和招聘特别困难。小组成员报告说,参与提高了他们在糖尿病护理中自我倡导的能力,并为他们提供了切实的技能和社会福利。小组成员表示,他们重视参与研究的各个方面,特别是知识转化活动,包括在收容所倡导提供营养食品;向利益相关者展示;并与政策制定者会面。

结论

使用参与式研究方法使学术研究人员能够支持社区成员开展与他们相关且具有积极影响的研究。在我们的研究中,共同研究者以有意义的方式做出了贡献,他们也很重视这一经历。