• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers.对偶癌症结局框架:癌症对患者和非专业照护者影响的通用框架。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114357. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
2
Dyadic associations between perceived social support and cancer patient and caregiver health: An actor-partner interdependence modeling approach.感知社会支持与癌症患者和照护者健康的双向关联:一种演员-伙伴相互依赖建模方法。
Psychooncology. 2019 Jul;28(7):1453-1460. doi: 10.1002/pon.5096. Epub 2019 May 8.
3
Enhancing the cancer caregiving experience: Building resilience through role adjustment and mutuality.增强癌症患者照护体验:通过角色调整和相互依存建立韧性。
Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2019 Dec;43:101663. doi: 10.1016/j.ejon.2019.09.004. Epub 2019 Sep 10.
4
Cognitively-Based Compassion Training versus cancer health education to improve health-related quality of life in survivors of solid tumor cancers and their informal caregivers: study protocol for a randomized controlled pilot trial.基于认知的共情训练与癌症健康教育对改善实体瘤癌症幸存者及其非专业照护者的健康相关生活质量的比较:一项随机对照初步试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2019 Apr 29;20(1):247. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3320-9.
5
Effectiveness of a nurse-delivered (FOCUS+) and a web-based (iFOCUS) psychoeducational intervention for people with advanced cancer and their family caregivers (DIAdIC): study protocol for an international randomized controlled trial.护士主导的(FOCUS+)和基于网络的(iFOCUS)心理教育干预对晚期癌症患者及其家庭照护者的有效性(DIAdIC):一项国际随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMC Palliat Care. 2021 Dec 28;20(1):193. doi: 10.1186/s12904-021-00895-z.
6
A dyadic examination of patients' and caregivers' attachment orientations and mutually supportive care in cancer caregiving.对癌症照护中患者和照护者的依恋取向以及相互支持的照护的双重考察。
Psychooncology. 2024 Jan;33(1):e6256. doi: 10.1002/pon.6256. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
7
Caregiver- and patient-directed interventions for dementia: an evidence-based analysis.针对痴呆症的照护者及患者导向干预措施:一项基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2008;8(4):1-98. Epub 2008 Oct 1.
8
Dyadic Interdependence in Non-spousal Caregiving Dyads' Wellbeing: A Systematic Review.非配偶照顾二元组幸福感中的二元相互依存:一项系统综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 29;13:882389. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.882389. eCollection 2022.
9
Partner interdependence and coping with life-threatening illness: the impact on dyadic adjustment.伴侣相互依赖与应对威胁生命的疾病:对双重适应的影响。
J Fam Psychol. 2013 Oct;27(5):702-11. doi: 10.1037/a0033871. Epub 2013 Aug 19.
10
The impact of relationship quality on life satisfaction and well-being in dementia caregiving dyads: findings from the IDEAL study.关系质量对痴呆症照护二元组中生活满意度和幸福感的影响:理想研究的结果
Aging Ment Health. 2020 Sep;24(9):1411-1420. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2019.1617238. Epub 2019 May 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Dyadic Analysis of Psychosocial and Health Outcomes in Black Breast Cancer Patients and Their Informal Caregivers.黑人乳腺癌患者及其非正式照料者心理社会和健康结局的纵向二元分析
Cancer Control. 2025 Jan-Dec;32:10732748251362950. doi: 10.1177/10732748251362950. Epub 2025 Aug 6.
2
Lived Experience of Caregivers of Lung Transplant Recipients in Korea.韩国肺移植受者照顾者的生活经历
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jul 4;13(13):1608. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13131608.
3
Support needs of young people caring for their parents with cancer.照顾患癌父母的年轻人的支持需求。
J Cancer Surviv. 2025 May 13. doi: 10.1007/s11764-025-01820-6.
4
Interdependence of health between patients with colorectal cancer and family caregivers: a cross-sectional study.结直肠癌患者与家庭照顾者之间的健康相互依存关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Nurs. 2025 May 12;24(1):515. doi: 10.1186/s12912-025-03062-4.
5
"Somewhat of an Adult": Understanding the "Dance" of Competing Tensions Parents Manage While Caring for an Adolescent or Young Adult (AYA) Diagnosed with Hematologic Malignancy.“有点像成年人”:理解父母在照顾被诊断患有血液系统恶性肿瘤的青少年或青年(AYA)时所应对的相互竞争的紧张关系之“舞蹈”。
Cancers (Basel). 2025 Apr 12;17(8):1299. doi: 10.3390/cancers17081299.
6
The longitudinal relationship between depression and anxiety in colorectal cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy and family caregivers: A cross lagged panel model.接受化疗的结直肠癌患者与其家庭照顾者的抑郁与焦虑之间的纵向关系:交叉滞后面板模型
PLoS One. 2025 Apr 16;20(4):e0319622. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0319622. eCollection 2025.
7
Associations between smartphone GPS data and changes in psychological health and burden outcomes among family caregivers and patients with advanced cancer: an exploratory longitudinal cohort study.智能手机GPS数据与晚期癌症家庭照料者及患者心理健康和负担结果变化之间的关联:一项探索性纵向队列研究。
BMC Cancer. 2025 Apr 4;25(1):614. doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14009-y.
8
Predictors of food security status among informal caregivers of older adults residing in slums in Ghana.加纳贫民窟中老年人非正式照料者的粮食安全状况预测因素。
BMC Public Health. 2025 Feb 4;25(1):447. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-21666-y.
9
The patient and caregiver experience of CAR T-cell therapy: A qualitative analysis.嵌合抗原受体T细胞疗法的患者及照护者体验:一项定性分析
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2025 Jan 30:1-11. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2025.2460060.
10
Sleep Quality, Nutritional Habits, and Physical Activity in Pediatric Cancer Survivors: A Dyadic Analysis Approach.儿科癌症幸存者的睡眠质量、营养习惯和身体活动:一种二元分析方法。
Nutrients. 2025 Jan 11;17(2):250. doi: 10.3390/nu17020250.

本文引用的文献

1
Social needs and health-related quality of life among African American cancer survivors: Results from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study.非裔美国癌症幸存者的社会需求和健康相关生活质量:来自底特律癌症幸存者研究的结果。
Cancer. 2021 Feb 1;127(3):467-475. doi: 10.1002/cncr.33286. Epub 2020 Nov 23.
2
Romantic relationships and sexual minority health: A review and description of the Dyadic Health Model.浪漫关系和性少数群体健康:对偶健康模型的回顾与描述。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2020 Dec;82:101924. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101924. Epub 2020 Sep 23.
3
The support that partners or caregivers provide sexual minority women who have cancer: A systematic review.癌症患者中性少数女性的伴侣或照顾者所提供的支持:系统评价。
Soc Sci Med. 2020 Sep;261:113214. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2020.113214. Epub 2020 Jul 18.
4
Hematological cancer patient-caregiver dyadic communication: A longitudinal examination of cancer communication concordance.血液系统恶性肿瘤患者-照护者的双重沟通:癌症沟通一致性的纵向研究。
Psychooncology. 2020 Oct;29(10):1571-1578. doi: 10.1002/pon.5458. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Systematic Review of Exercise for Caregiver-Care Recipient Dyads: What Is Best for Spousal Caregivers-Exercising Together or Not at All?系统评价锻炼对照顾者-被照顾者二人组的影响:配偶照顾者一起锻炼好还是完全不锻炼好?
Gerontologist. 2021 Aug 13;61(6):e283-e301. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnaa043.
6
Sexual health in colon cancer patients: A systematic review.结直肠癌患者的性健康:系统评价。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jul;29(7):1095-1104. doi: 10.1002/pon.5391. Epub 2020 Apr 20.
7
Interdependence of physical and psychological morbidity among patients with cancer and family caregivers: Review of the literature.癌症患者及其家庭照顾者的身体和心理发病率的相互依赖性:文献综述。
Psychooncology. 2020 Jun;29(6):974-989. doi: 10.1002/pon.5382. Epub 2020 Apr 13.
8
A systematic review of dyadic studies examining depression in couples facing breast cancer.对夫妻双方在面对乳腺癌时抑郁情况的双体研究进行的系统回顾。
J Psychosoc Oncol. 2020 Jul-Aug;38(4):463-480. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1734894. Epub 2020 Mar 23.
9
Worry About Daily Financial Needs and Food Insecurity Among Cancer Survivors in the United States.美国癌症幸存者每日经济需求和食物不安全感的担忧。
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2020 Mar;18(3):315-327. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.7359.
10
Social Determinants of Health: Underreported Heterogeneity in Systematic Reviews of Caregiver Interventions.社会决定因素与健康:照顾者干预措施系统评价中被低估的异质性。
Gerontologist. 2020 Feb 14;60(Suppl 1):S14-S28. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnz148.

对偶癌症结局框架:癌症对患者和非专业照护者影响的通用框架。

The Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework: A general framework of the effects of cancer on patients and informal caregivers.

机构信息

Washington University in St. Louis, Brown School of Social Work, One Brookings Drive, Campus Box 1196, St. Louis, MO, 63130, USA.

Moffitt Cancer Center, Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, Tampa, FL, USA.

出版信息

Soc Sci Med. 2021 Oct;287:114357. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114357. Epub 2021 Aug 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114357
PMID:34500320
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8936416/
Abstract

It is widely acknowledged that cancer affects not only patients but also their friends and family members who provide informal, and typically unpaid, care. Given the dual impact that cancer often has on patients and their informal caregivers (i.e., family members, partners, or friends), an expanded dyadic framework that encompasses a range of health and psychosocial outcomes and includes primary caregivers with a range of relationships to the patients is critically needed. Moreover, an emphasis on the role of social and contextual factors may help the framework resonate with a broader range of patient-caregiver relationships and allow for the development of more effective dyadic interventions. This article describes the development of the Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework, which was created to guide future research and intervention development. Using an iterative process, we conducted a conceptual review of currently used dyadic and/or caregiving models and frameworks and developed our own novel dyadic framework. Our novel Dyadic Cancer Outcomes Framework highlights individual- and dyad-level predictors and outcomes, as well as incorporating the disease trajectory and the social context. This framework can be used in conjunction with statistical approaches including the Actor Partner Interdependence Model to evaluate outcomes for different kinds of partner-caregiver dyads. This flexible framework can be used to guide intervention development and evaluation for cancer patients and their primary caregivers, with the ultimate goal of improving health, psychosocial, and relationship outcomes for both patients and caregivers. Future research will provide valuable information about the framework's effectiveness for this purpose.

摘要

人们普遍认识到,癌症不仅影响患者,还影响为患者提供非正式、通常是无偿护理的朋友和家庭成员。鉴于癌症通常对患者及其非正式照顾者(即家庭成员、伴侣或朋友)都有双重影响,因此迫切需要一个扩展的对偶框架,该框架涵盖一系列健康和心理社会结果,并包括与患者有各种关系的主要照顾者。此外,强调社会和环境因素的作用可能有助于该框架与更广泛的患者-照顾者关系产生共鸣,并为更有效的对偶干预措施的发展提供依据。本文描述了对偶癌症结果框架的制定,该框架旨在指导未来的研究和干预措施的发展。我们使用迭代过程,对当前使用的对偶和/或照顾模型和框架进行了概念性审查,并制定了我们自己的新对偶框架。我们新的对偶癌症结果框架强调个体和对偶层面的预测因素和结果,并纳入疾病轨迹和社会环境。该框架可以与包括演员-伙伴相互依存模型在内的统计方法结合使用,以评估不同类型的伙伴-照顾者对偶的结果。这个灵活的框架可用于指导癌症患者及其主要照顾者的干预措施的制定和评估,最终目标是改善患者和照顾者的健康、心理社会和关系结果。未来的研究将为该框架在这方面的有效性提供有价值的信息。