• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

技术进步是否对多种污染物排放具有选择性?

Is Technological Progress Selective for Multiple Pollutant Emissions?

机构信息

Center for Quantitative Economics, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.

Business School, Jilin University, Changchun 130012, China.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179286.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph18179286
PMID:34501874
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8431310/
Abstract

Current research on technological progress does not focus on whether there is a biased selection of technological progress based on the resulting pollutant emissions and the emission reduction effect. This paper measures green total factor productivity for 30 provinces in China from 2004-2018 and tests whether technological progress is selectively biased towards the pollutants emitted. The results find a selective bias of technological progress on pollutant emissions, and there is also heterogeneity in the selective bias across regions. The current level of technological progress is on the right side of the inverted U-shaped inflection point for SO and PM and the left side of the inverted U-shaped inflection point for CO. The improvement of technological progress can reduce the emissions of SO and PM. Still, the results indicate that the reduction effect of these two pollutants originates from the treatment process rather than reducing the source of the production side. The inability of technological advancement to reduce CO emissions suggests some carbon lock-in in China's technological advancement. The Chinese government should increase the proportion of new energy applications and reduce the production methods of polluting industries to reduce pollutants effectively.

摘要

当前的技术进步研究并未关注技术进步是否会基于产生的污染物排放和减排效果而产生有偏向的选择。本文测算了 2004-2018 年中国 30 个省份的绿色全要素生产率,并检验了技术进步是否对污染物排放存在选择性偏向。结果发现技术进步对污染物排放存在选择性偏向,且这种选择性偏向在不同地区存在异质性。目前的技术进步水平处于 SO 和 PM 的倒 U 型拐点的右侧,而 CO 的拐点则在左侧。技术进步的提高可以减少 SO 和 PM 的排放。然而,结果表明这两种污染物的减排效果源于处理过程,而不是减少生产侧的源头。技术进步无法减少 CO 排放表明中国的技术进步存在一定的碳锁定。中国政府应增加新能源应用的比例,减少污染产业的生产方式,以有效减少污染物。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/fc8c930e6177/ijerph-18-09286-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/d736c693199a/ijerph-18-09286-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/9eacc357696e/ijerph-18-09286-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/5571c529211f/ijerph-18-09286-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/fc8c930e6177/ijerph-18-09286-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/d736c693199a/ijerph-18-09286-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/9eacc357696e/ijerph-18-09286-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/5571c529211f/ijerph-18-09286-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/90ec/8431310/fc8c930e6177/ijerph-18-09286-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Is Technological Progress Selective for Multiple Pollutant Emissions?技术进步是否对多种污染物排放具有选择性?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Sep 2;18(17):9286. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18179286.
2
Towards carbon neutrality: The role of different paths of technological progress in mitigating China's CO emissions.迈向碳中和:不同技术进步路径在缓解中国 CO 排放方面的作用。
Sci Total Environ. 2022 Mar 20;813:152588. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152588. Epub 2021 Dec 23.
3
Factor decomposition and decoupling analysis of air pollutant emissions in China's iron and steel industry.中国钢铁行业污染物排放的因素分解与脱钩分析。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 May;27(13):15267-15277. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-07997-w. Epub 2020 Feb 19.
4
The Impact of Technological Progress in the Energy Sector on Carbon Emissions: An Empirical Analysis from China.能源部门技术进步对碳排放的影响:来自中国的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Dec 4;14(12):1505. doi: 10.3390/ijerph14121505.
5
The nonlinear impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: from the perspective of biased technological progress.财政分权对碳排放的非线性影响:基于偏向性技术进步视角
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29890-29899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12833-w. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
6
Environmental impact of national and subnational carbon policies in China based on a multi-regional dynamic CGE model.基于多区域动态 CGE 模型的中国国家和次国家碳政策的环境影响。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Sep 15;270:110901. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110901. Epub 2020 Jun 14.
7
Green Paradox or Forced Emission Reduction-The Dual Effects of Environmental Regulation on Carbon Emissions.绿色悖论还是强制减排——环境规制对碳排放的双重影响。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 3;19(17):11058. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191711058.
8
How does heterogeneous environmental regulation affect net carbon emissions: Spatial and threshold analysis for China.异质性环境规制如何影响碳排放净额:基于中国的空间和门槛分析
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 15;330:117161. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117161. Epub 2023 Jan 3.
9
Evaluating the impacts of technological progress on agricultural energy consumption and carbon emissions based on multi-scenario analysis.基于多情景分析评估技术进步对农业能源消耗和碳排放的影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Feb;30(6):16673-16686. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-23376-z. Epub 2022 Oct 3.
10
Synergistic effect of air pollutant abatement on CO reduction in the industrial sector: evidence from China.大气污染物减排对工业部门 CO 减排的协同效应:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Mar;30(13):37726-37743. doi: 10.1007/s11356-022-24886-6. Epub 2022 Dec 27.

引用本文的文献

1
The Carbon Emission Reduction Effect of Tourism Economy and Its Formation Mechanism: An Empirical Study of China's 92 Tourism-Dependent Cities.旅游经济的碳减排效应及其形成机制:基于中国 92 个旅游依赖型城市的实证研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Feb 5;19(3):1824. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19031824.

本文引用的文献

1
Can China's Environmental Regulations Effectively Reduce Pollution Emissions?中国的环境法规能否有效减少污染排放?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 27;18(9):4658. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094658.
2
Short-Term Effects of Particulate Matter and Its Constituents on Emergency Room Visits for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Time-Stratified Case-Crossover Study in an Urban Area.短期颗粒物及其成分对慢性阻塞性肺疾病急诊就诊的影响:城市地区的时间分层病例交叉研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Apr 21;18(9):4400. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18094400.
3
Analysis of the Cause of Household Carbon Lock-In for Chinese Urban Households.
中国城市家庭碳锁定成因分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 23;18(4):2201. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042201.
4
The nonlinear impact of fiscal decentralization on carbon emissions: from the perspective of biased technological progress.财政分权对碳排放的非线性影响:基于偏向性技术进步视角
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Jun;28(23):29890-29899. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-12833-w. Epub 2021 Feb 11.
5
Global value chains, technological progress, and environmental pollution: Inequality towards developing countries.全球价值链、技术进步与环境污染:发展中国家的不平等问题。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jan 1;277:110999. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110999. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
6
The impact of real estate investment on air quality: evidence from China.房地产投资对空气质量的影响:来自中国的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(18):22989-23001. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08874-2. Epub 2020 Apr 23.
7
Does environment-biased technological progress reduce CO emissions in APEC economies? Evidence from fossil and clean energy consumption.环境偏向型技术进步是否会降低 APEC 经济体的 CO 排放?来自化石和清洁能源消费的证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2020 Jun;27(17):20984-20999. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-08437-5. Epub 2020 Apr 6.
8
Green technology innovation development in China in 1990-2015.中国 1990-2015 年绿色技术创新发展。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Dec 15;696:134008. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134008. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
9
Going Green or Going Away? A Spatial Empirical Examination of the Relationship between Environmental Regulations, Biased Technological Progress, and Green Total Factor Productivity.走向绿色还是走向消亡?环境规制、偏向性技术进步与绿色全要素生产率关系的空间实证检验
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Sep 3;15(9):1917. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15091917.
10
Choice of technological change for China's low-carbon development: Evidence from three urban agglomerations.中国低碳发展的技术变革选择:来自三个城市群的证据。
J Environ Manage. 2018 Jan 15;206:1308-1319. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.08.052. Epub 2017 Sep 5.