Post Graduation Program in Biology and Biotechnology of Microorganisms, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus 45662-900, Bahia, Brazil.
Department of Biological Science, State University of Santa Cruz, Ilhéus 45662-900, Bahia, Brazil.
Int J Mol Sci. 2021 Aug 24;22(17):9110. doi: 10.3390/ijms22179110.
Biomarkers are valuable tools in clinical practice. In 2001, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) standardized the definition of a biomarker as a characteristic that is objectively measured and evaluated as an indicator of normal biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological responses to a therapeutic intervention. A biomarker has clinical relevance when it presents precision, standardization and reproducibility, suitability to the patient, straightforward interpretation by clinicians, and high sensitivity and/or specificity by the parameter it proposes to identify. Thus, serum biomarkers should have advantages related to the simplicity of the procedures and to the fact that venous blood collection is commonplace in clinical practice. We described the potentiality of cfDNA as a general clinical biomarker and focused on endothelial dysfunction. Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) refers to extracellular DNA present in body fluid that may be derived from both normal and diseased cells. An increasing number of studies demonstrate the potential use of cfDNA as a noninvasive biomarker to determine physiologic and pathologic conditions. However, although still scarce, increasing evidence has been reported regarding using cfDNA in cardiovascular diseases. Here, we have reviewed the history of cfDNA, its source, molecular features, and release mechanism. We also show recent studies that have investigated cfDNA as a possible marker of endothelial damage in clinical settings. In the cardiovascular system, the studies are quite new, and although interesting, stronger evidence is still needed. However, some drawbacks in cfDNA methodologies should be overcome before its recommendation as a biomarker in the clinical setting.
生物标志物在临床实践中是很有价值的工具。2001 年,美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)将生物标志物定义为一种特征,该特征可客观测量和评估,作为正常生物学过程、病理过程或药物治疗反应的指标。当生物标志物具有精确性、标准化和可重复性、适用于患者、临床医生易于解释以及其拟议的参数具有高灵敏度和/或特异性时,它具有临床相关性。因此,血清生物标志物应该具有与操作简单性相关的优势,并且静脉采血在临床实践中很常见。我们描述了 cfDNA 作为一般临床生物标志物的潜力,并重点介绍了内皮功能障碍。循环细胞游离 DNA(cfDNA)是指存在于体液中的细胞外 DNA,可能来自正常细胞和病变细胞。越来越多的研究表明,cfDNA 作为一种非侵入性生物标志物,可用于确定生理和病理状况。然而,尽管证据仍然很少,但越来越多的证据表明 cfDNA 可用于心血管疾病。在这里,我们回顾了 cfDNA 的历史、来源、分子特征和释放机制。我们还展示了最近的研究,这些研究调查了 cfDNA 作为临床环境中内皮损伤的一种可能标志物。在心血管系统中,这些研究相当新,尽管很有趣,但仍需要更强有力的证据。然而,在推荐 cfDNA 作为临床生物标志物之前,应该克服其方法学中的一些缺点。
Int J Mol Sci. 2021-8-24
Crit Rev Clin Lab Sci. 2018-1-5
Clin Chim Acta. 2020-1-21
Transl Psychiatry. 2018-10-29
Mol Diagn Ther. 2025-5
Front Cell Dev Biol. 2025-3-28
Biomolecules. 2020-12-15
Hum Genet. 2021-4
Physiol Res. 2020-7-16
Angiology. 2020-2-20