• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[对弗赖堡人格问卷简版、艾森克人格问卷、吉森测验和伯杰量表的同步分析——关于这些量表在评估自我接纳和他人接纳方面诊断价值的一项贡献]

[Simultaneous analyses of the Freiburg Personality Inventory short form, the Eysenck Personality Inventory, the Giessen Test and Berger Scales--a contribution to the diagnostic value of the scales in assessing self acceptance and acceptance of others].

作者信息

Bergemann N, Johann G K

机构信息

Erziehungswissenchaftliche Hochschule Rheinland-Pfalz, Abteilung Landau Seminar für Psychologie.

出版信息

Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1987;35(4):304-12.

PMID:3451613
Abstract

To verify the diagnostical value of the German version of the Berger scales for assessing self acceptance and acceptance of others, the scales and the short form of the "Freiburger Persönlichkeits Inventar" (FPI-K), the German version of the EPI, and the Giessen-Test were presented to a sample of 107 subjects. The data were evaluated by item analysis, correlational analysis, factor analysis, and NMDS. The results--in some degree a replication of earlier studies--prove the practicability of both constructs: The self acceptance scale assesses a positive self-image with a strong extraverted component, the acceptance of others scale shows negative relations to the aggression scales of the FPI-K. Besides this the NMDS can demonstrate a component of social desirability. The integration of both constructs into traditional concepts of personality is discussed in connection with the NMDS.

摘要

为验证德语版伯杰量表在评估自我接纳和他人接纳方面的诊断价值,我们将这些量表以及“弗莱堡人格问卷简版”(FPI-K)、德语版艾森克人格问卷(EPI)和吉森测试呈现给了107名受试者组成的样本。通过项目分析、相关分析、因子分析和非度量多维尺度分析(NMDS)对数据进行了评估。结果——在某种程度上重复了早期研究——证明了这两个量表结构的实用性:自我接纳量表评估的是具有强烈外向成分的积极自我形象,他人接纳量表与FPI-K的攻击量表呈负相关。除此之外,NMDS能够证明社会期望的一个成分。结合NMDS讨论了将这两个量表结构整合到传统人格概念中的问题。

相似文献

1
[Simultaneous analyses of the Freiburg Personality Inventory short form, the Eysenck Personality Inventory, the Giessen Test and Berger Scales--a contribution to the diagnostic value of the scales in assessing self acceptance and acceptance of others].[对弗赖堡人格问卷简版、艾森克人格问卷、吉森测验和伯杰量表的同步分析——关于这些量表在评估自我接纳和他人接纳方面诊断价值的一项贡献]
Z Klin Psychol Psychopathol Psychother. 1987;35(4):304-12.
2
[The self concept and personality structure of alcohol intoxicated drivers: how do they see themselves, and how are they judged by others?].[酒精中毒司机的自我概念和人格结构:他们如何看待自己,以及他人如何评价他们?]
Blutalkohol. 1995 Jan;32(1):8-25.
3
Self-Deceptive Enhancement and Impression Management correlates of EPQ-R dimensions.艾森克人格问卷修订版(EPQ-R)各维度的自欺性增强与印象管理相关性
J Psychol. 1998 Jul;132(4):401-6. doi: 10.1080/00223989809599274.
4
Construct validity for self-acceptance and fear of negative evaluation.
Psychol Rep. 2001 Oct;89(2):386. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.89.2.386.
5
Relation of self-acceptance and acceptance of others.自我接纳与接纳他人的关系。
Psychol Rep. 2001 Apr;88(2):410. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2001.88.2.410.
6
Self-acceptance, acceptance of others, and SYMLOG: equivalent measures of the two central interpersonal dimensions?自我接纳、接纳他人与SYMLOG:两种核心人际维度的等效测量指标?
J Clin Psychol. 1991 Jul;47(4):576-82. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199107)47:4<576::aid-jclp2270470417>3.0.co;2-r.
7
[Factor structure of multidimensional personality inventories MMPI, 16-PF, FPI and GT].
Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz). 1983 Apr;35(4):236-43.
8
Interpersonal traits in childhood: development of the child and adolescent interpersonal survey.童年期的人际特质:儿童与青少年人际调查问卷的编制
J Pers Assess. 2006 Dec;87(3):317-29. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8703_12.
9
[Possibilities of computer-assisted administration of the revised Freiburg Personality Inventory. 2 experimental studies].[修订版弗莱堡人格问卷的计算机辅助施测可能性。两项实验研究]
Z Exp Psychol. 1997;44(2):332-56.
10
Relationships among AVA and ACL scales as measured on a sample of college students.
J Clin Psychol. 1968 Jan;24(1):52-60. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(196801)24:1<52::aid-jclp2270240114>3.0.co;2-2.