• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Chilean validation of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis-structure questionnaire (OPD-SQ) for personality structure.智利验证操作性心理动力学诊断-结构问卷(OPD-SQ)对人格结构的诊断。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;9(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00640-4.
2
[The OPD structure questionnaire captures the general features of personality disorder].门诊人格障碍结构问卷捕捉人格障碍的一般特征。
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2015 Feb;65(2):81-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395626. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
3
[Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis - Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ) in Youth: First Results on Reliability and Validity].[青少年操作性心理动力诊断 - 结构问卷(OPD-SQ):信效度的初步结果]
Prax Kinderpsychol Kinderpsychiatr. 2018 Nov;67(7):674-690. doi: 10.13109/prkk.2018.67.7.674.
4
Assessment of personality functioning: validity of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis axis IV (structure).人格功能评估:操作性精神动力学诊断轴IV(结构)的效度
Psychopathology. 2014;47(3):185-93. doi: 10.1159/000355062. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
5
[The OPD Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ): first results on reliability and validity].[门诊结构问卷(OPD-SQ):关于信度和效度的初步结果]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2012 Jan;62(1):25-32. doi: 10.1055/s-0031-1295481. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
6
[The latent structure of psychodynamic and psychological personality models: Conjoint investigation of OPD-CQ, OPD-SQS and BFI-2].[心理动力和心理人格模型的潜在结构:OPD-CQ、OPD-SQS和BFI-2的联合调查]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2021 Sep;67(3):241-255. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2021.67.oa5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
7
[Cross-validation of three questionnaires for structural diagnosis: BPI, IPO, and OPD-SQ].[用于结构诊断的三份问卷的交叉验证:简明疼痛问卷(BPI)、国际功能、残疾和健康分类问卷(IPO)以及门诊患者数据收集与分析系统问卷(OPD-SQ)]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2016;62(2):177-89. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2016.62.2.177.
8
Measurement of Personality Structure by the OPD Structure Questionnaire Can Help to Discriminate Between Subtypes of Eating-Disorders.使用OPD结构问卷测量人格结构有助于区分饮食失调的亚型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 17;10:2326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02326. eCollection 2019.
9
[First results on the reliability and validity of the OPD-2 axis structure].[关于OPD-2轴结构的信效度的初步结果]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2009;55(1):84-96. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2009.55.1.84.
10
[Reliability and validity of the OPD-conflict-questionnaire in an inpatient treatment sample].[门诊冲突问卷在住院治疗样本中的信度与效度]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2022 Mar;68(1):39-53. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2022.68.1.39.

引用本文的文献

1
Differences and similarities in personality functioning across different types of eating disorders.不同类型饮食失调症患者人格功能的差异与相似之处。
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jun 1;14:1155725. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1155725. eCollection 2023.
2
Tracking Psychodynamic Foci: Trajectories Through the Therapeutic Process.追踪心理动力焦点:贯穿治疗过程的轨迹
Front Psychol. 2022 Jun 6;13:786240. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.786240. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Self-Reported Levels of Personality Functioning from the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) System and Emotional Intelligence Likely Assess the Same Latent Construct.自我报告的人格功能水平来自操作性心理诊断(OPD)系统和情绪智力可能评估相同的潜在结构。
J Pers Assess. 2021 May-Jun;103(3):365-379. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1775089. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
Personality Structure and Attachment in Bipolar Disorder.双相情感障碍中的人格结构与依恋关系
Front Psychiatry. 2020 May 11;11:410. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00410. eCollection 2020.
3
[Level of personality functioning (OPD-2) and the symptom severity of posttraumatic stress disorder - a cohort study].[人格功能水平(OPD-2)与创伤后应激障碍的症状严重程度——一项队列研究]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2020 Feb;66(1):5-19. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2020.66.1.5.
4
Measurement of Personality Structure by the OPD Structure Questionnaire Can Help to Discriminate Between Subtypes of Eating-Disorders.使用OPD结构问卷测量人格结构有助于区分饮食失调的亚型。
Front Psychol. 2019 Oct 17;10:2326. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02326. eCollection 2019.
5
Mentalization and criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders: Results from a clinical and nonclinical sample.心理化与人格障碍替代模型的标准 A:来自临床和非临床样本的结果。
Personal Disord. 2020 May;11(3):191-201. doi: 10.1037/per0000356. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
6
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
7
Levels of personality functioning and not depression predict decline of plasma glucose concentration in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.人格功能水平而非抑郁预测 2 型糖尿病患者血浆葡萄糖浓度的下降。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May;151:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
8
Change of Emotional Experience in Major Depression and Borderline Personality Disorder During Psychotherapy: Associations With Depression Severity and Personality Functioning.心理治疗期间重度抑郁症和边缘型人格障碍患者情绪体验的变化:与抑郁严重程度和人格功能的关联
J Pers Disord. 2021 Mar;35(Suppl A):1-20. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_420. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
9
The Development of the ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders: An Amalgam of Science, Pragmatism, and Politics.《ICD-11 人格障碍分类的发展:科学、实用主义与政治的融合》
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:481-502. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
10
[Psychometric properties of a spanish version of the Beck depression inventory IA].[贝克抑郁量表IA西班牙语版的心理测量特性]
Rev Med Chil. 2017 Aug;145(8):1005-1012. doi: 10.4067/s0034-98872017000801005.

智利验证操作性心理动力学诊断-结构问卷(OPD-SQ)对人格结构的诊断。

Chilean validation of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis-structure questionnaire (OPD-SQ) for personality structure.

机构信息

Psychoanalysis Unit, Research Department of Clinical, Educational and Health Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

Department of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Diagonal Paraguay 362, 8330077, Santiago, Chile.

出版信息

BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;9(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00640-4.

DOI:10.1186/s40359-021-00640-4
PMID:34517907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8436439/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This is the validation of the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQ).

METHODS

A clinical sample of 399 adults and a nonclinical general population sample of 50 healthy adults completed measures of depression, attachment, psychiatric symptomatology and distress. Internal consistency and concurrent validity were assessed. Test-retest and Reliable Change Index were also calculated, as was the ability of the OPD-SQ to distinguish between the clinical and general population groups.

RESULTS

High internal consistencies were found; significant differences between clinical and nonclinical samples, and significant associations with psychiatric symptomatology, depression and psychological distress.

CONCLUSION

The Chilean OPD-SQ has good reliability, and discriminates between clinical and healthy samples.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在验证操作性心理动力学诊断结构问卷(OPD-SQ)。

方法

临床样本包括 399 名成年人和非临床一般人群样本中的 50 名健康成年人,他们完成了抑郁、依恋、精神症状和痛苦等方面的测量。评估了内部一致性和同时效度。还计算了测试-重测和可靠变化指数,以及 OPD-SQ 区分临床组和一般人群组的能力。

结果

发现内部一致性很高;临床样本和非临床样本之间存在显著差异,与精神症状、抑郁和心理困扰显著相关。

结论

智利的 OPD-SQ 具有良好的可靠性,并能区分临床组和健康组。