• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

自我报告的人格功能水平来自操作性心理诊断(OPD)系统和情绪智力可能评估相同的潜在结构。

Self-Reported Levels of Personality Functioning from the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) System and Emotional Intelligence Likely Assess the Same Latent Construct.

机构信息

Clinical Psychology and Behavioral Neuroscience, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Graz, Austria.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2021 May-Jun;103(3):365-379. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1775089. Epub 2020 Jul 6.

DOI:10.1080/00223891.2020.1775089
PMID:32631173
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7611281/
Abstract

We tested the hypothesis that structural integration, as assessed in the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) system, and emotional intelligence (EI), as studied in personality psychology, might be closely related constructs at a general level, as both might assess general personality functioning. In three studies ( = 166, = 204, = 349), we used a self-report measure of OPD structural integration and measures of Trait and Ability EI. Structural integration and Trait EI display very high correlation at general factor level ( = .77 - .82) and almost perfect latent correlation ( = .85 - .90). This correlation cannot be explained away by the general positivity of self-views or socially desirable responding. There is also substantial latent correlation between structural integration and Ability EI ( = .20 - .65). Results replicate over different samples from different countries and extend to the DSM-5 self-report personality functioning scale.

摘要

我们检验了这样一个假设,即在操作性心理诊断(OPD)系统中评估的结构整合,以及在人格心理学中研究的情绪智力(EI),可能在一般水平上是密切相关的结构,因为两者都可能评估一般人格功能。在三项研究中(n=166,n=204,n=349),我们使用了 OPD 结构整合的自我报告测量和特质和能力 EI 的测量。结构整合和特质 EI 在一般因素水平上显示出非常高的相关性(r=0.77-0.82),几乎完美的潜在相关性(r=0.85-0.90)。这种相关性不能用自我看法的一般积极性或社会期望的反应来解释。结构整合和能力 EI 之间也存在实质性的潜在相关性(r=0.20-0.65)。结果在来自不同国家的不同样本中复制,并扩展到 DSM-5 自我报告的人格功能量表。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39bc/7611281/b806147308db/EMS130371-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39bc/7611281/b62d9bae553e/EMS130371-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39bc/7611281/b806147308db/EMS130371-f002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39bc/7611281/b62d9bae553e/EMS130371-f001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/39bc/7611281/b806147308db/EMS130371-f002.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-Reported Levels of Personality Functioning from the Operationalized Psychodynamic Diagnosis (OPD) System and Emotional Intelligence Likely Assess the Same Latent Construct.自我报告的人格功能水平来自操作性心理诊断(OPD)系统和情绪智力可能评估相同的潜在结构。
J Pers Assess. 2021 May-Jun;103(3):365-379. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2020.1775089. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
2
[The OPD structure questionnaire captures the general features of personality disorder].门诊人格障碍结构问卷捕捉人格障碍的一般特征。
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2015 Feb;65(2):81-3. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1395626. Epub 2014 Dec 11.
3
Assessing the level of structural integration using operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis (OPD): implications for DSM-5.运用操作性心理动力学诊断(OPD)评估结构整合水平:对 DSM-5 的启示。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(5):522-32. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.700664. Epub 2012 Jul 18.
4
Self-report and observer ratings of personality functioning: a study of the OPD system.自评和观察评定人格功能:OPD 系统研究。
J Pers Assess. 2014;96(2):220-5. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2013.828065. Epub 2013 Sep 5.
5
Assessment of personality functioning: validity of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis axis IV (structure).人格功能评估:操作性精神动力学诊断轴IV(结构)的效度
Psychopathology. 2014;47(3):185-93. doi: 10.1159/000355062. Epub 2013 Oct 26.
6
[Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1)].[《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版人格功能半结构化访谈德语版(STiP - 5.1)的心理测量评估]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019 Dec;69(12):499-504. doi: 10.1055/a-1010-6887. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
7
[The latent structure of psychodynamic and psychological personality models: Conjoint investigation of OPD-CQ, OPD-SQS and BFI-2].[心理动力和心理人格模型的潜在结构:OPD-CQ、OPD-SQS和BFI-2的联合调查]
Z Psychosom Med Psychother. 2021 Sep;67(3):241-255. doi: 10.13109/zptm.2021.67.oa5. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
8
Chilean validation of the operationalized psychodynamic diagnosis-structure questionnaire (OPD-SQ) for personality structure.智利验证操作性心理动力学诊断-结构问卷(OPD-SQ)对人格结构的诊断。
BMC Psychol. 2021 Sep 13;9(1):139. doi: 10.1186/s40359-021-00640-4.
9
Personality dimensions emerging during adolescence and young adulthood are underpinned by a single latent trait indexing impairment in social functioning.青少年和青年时期出现的人格维度由一个潜在的特质所支撑,该特质反映了社交功能障碍。
BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1595-0.
10
Introducing a short self-report for the assessment of DSM-5 level of personality functioning for personality disorders: The Self and Interpersonal Functioning Scale.引入一个简短的自我报告,用于评估人格障碍的 DSM-5 人格功能水平:自我和人际功能量表。
Personal Disord. 2019 Sep;10(5):438-447. doi: 10.1037/per0000335. Epub 2019 Apr 29.

引用本文的文献

1
Personality functioning and mental distress in leaders of small- and medium sized enterprises.中小企业领导者的人格功能与心理困扰。
PLoS One. 2024 Nov 20;19(11):e0312675. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0312675. eCollection 2024.
2
Examining the role of personality functioning in a hierarchical taxonomy of psychopathology using two years of ambulatory assessed data.使用两年的动态评估数据,在精神病理学的层级分类中检验人格功能的作用。
Transl Psychiatry. 2024 Aug 24;14(1):340. doi: 10.1038/s41398-024-03046-z.
3
Relationship between Physical Activity, Mediterranean Diet and Emotional Intelligence in Spanish Primary Education Students.

本文引用的文献

1
[Psychometric Evaluation of the German Version of the Semi-Structured Interview for Personality Functioning DSM-5 (STiP-5.1)].[《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第5版人格功能半结构化访谈德语版(STiP - 5.1)的心理测量评估]
Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2019 Dec;69(12):499-504. doi: 10.1055/a-1010-6887. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
2
Mentalization and criterion a of the alternative model for personality disorders: Results from a clinical and nonclinical sample.心理化与人格障碍替代模型的标准 A:来自临床和非临床样本的结果。
Personal Disord. 2020 May;11(3):191-201. doi: 10.1037/per0000356. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
3
A Brief but Comprehensive Review of Research on the Alternative DSM-5 Model for Personality Disorders.
西班牙小学生的体育活动、地中海饮食与情商之间的关系
Children (Basel). 2023 Oct 7;10(10):1663. doi: 10.3390/children10101663.
4
Measuring personality functioning with the 12-item version of the OPD-Structure Questionnaire (OPD-SQS): reliability, factor structure, validity, and measurement invariance in the general population.使用12项版《人格诊断问卷-结构问卷》(OPD-SQS)测量人格功能:一般人群中的信度、因子结构、效度及测量不变性
Front Psychol. 2023 Sep 14;14:1248992. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1248992. eCollection 2023.
5
Characterization of different types of anxiety disorders in relation to structural integration of personality and adverse and protective childhood experiences in psychotherapy outpatients - a cross-sectional study.探讨心理治疗门诊患者中不同类型焦虑障碍与人格结构整合以及不良和保护童年经历的关系:一项横断面研究。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 12;23(1):501. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-04988-2.
6
Structural impairment and conflict load as vulnerability factors for burnout - A cross-sectional study from the German working population.作为职业倦怠脆弱因素的结构损伤与冲突负荷——来自德国劳动人口的横断面研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 24;13:1000572. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1000572. eCollection 2022.
7
Level of Structural Integration and Its Association with Intersession Experiences and Outcomes: A Pilot Study.结构整合水平及其与疗程间体验和结果的关联:一项初步研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 28;19(15):9254. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19159254.
8
Assessment of personality functioning in psychosomatic medicine.心身医学中的人格功能评估。
Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2022 Aug;134(15-16):602-610. doi: 10.1007/s00508-021-01993-x. Epub 2022 Mar 28.
9
Validation of the German Five-Factor Narcissism Inventory and Construction of a Brief Form Using Ant Colony Optimization.采用蚁群优化算法验证德国五因素自恋量表及其简式的构建
Assessment. 2023 Jun;30(4):969-997. doi: 10.1177/10731911221075761. Epub 2022 Feb 18.
10
Conspiracy endorsement and its associations with personality functioning, anxiety, loneliness, and sociodemographic characteristics during the COVID-19 pandemic in a representative sample of the German population.在德国代表性人群中,针对新冠疫情的阴谋论认可及其与人格功能、焦虑、孤独和社会人口学特征的关联。
PLoS One. 2022 Jan 28;17(1):e0263301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263301. eCollection 2022.
DSM-5 人格障碍替代模型研究的简要但全面的综述。
Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2019 Aug 13;21(9):92. doi: 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z.
4
Levels of personality functioning and not depression predict decline of plasma glucose concentration in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.人格功能水平而非抑郁预测 2 型糖尿病患者血浆葡萄糖浓度的下降。
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2019 May;151:106-113. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2019.04.011. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
5
Change of Emotional Experience in Major Depression and Borderline Personality Disorder During Psychotherapy: Associations With Depression Severity and Personality Functioning.心理治疗期间重度抑郁症和边缘型人格障碍患者情绪体验的变化:与抑郁严重程度和人格功能的关联
J Pers Disord. 2021 Mar;35(Suppl A):1-20. doi: 10.1521/pedi_2019_33_420. Epub 2019 Feb 20.
6
The Development of the ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders: An Amalgam of Science, Pragmatism, and Politics.《ICD-11 人格障碍分类的发展:科学、实用主义与政治的融合》
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2019 May 7;15:481-502. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736. Epub 2019 Jan 2.
7
The Relationship between Grandiose and Vulnerable (Hypersensitive) Narcissism.夸大性自恋与脆弱(敏感)型自恋之间的关系。
Front Psychol. 2017 Sep 13;8:1600. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01600. eCollection 2017.
8
Role of Personality Functioning in the Quality of Life of Patients with Depression.人格功能在抑郁症患者生活质量中的作用。
J Nerv Ment Dis. 2017 Sep;205(9):705-713. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0000000000000676.
9
Development and initial evaluation of a self-report form of the DSM-5 Level of Personality Functioning Scale.DSM-5 人格功能水平评定量表自评形式的编制与初步评估。
Psychol Assess. 2017 Oct;29(10):1302-1308. doi: 10.1037/pas0000450. Epub 2017 Feb 27.
10
Overlap between the general factor of personality and emotional intelligence: A meta-analysis.人格的一般因素与情绪智力的重叠:元分析。
Psychol Bull. 2017 Jan;143(1):36-52. doi: 10.1037/bul0000078. Epub 2016 Nov 14.