Casado Jose L, Haemmerle Johannes, Vizcarra Pilar, Rodriguez-Dominguez Mario, Velasco Tamara, Velasco Hector, Centenera Elena, Romero-Hernandez Beatriz, Fernandez-Escribano Marina, Vallejo Alejandro
Department of Infectious Diseases Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain.
Department of Prevention of Occupational Risks Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain.
Clin Transl Immunology. 2021 Sep 8;10(9):e1341. doi: 10.1002/cti2.1341. eCollection 2021.
Antibody response to the first dose of BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 is greater in COVID-19-convalescent than in infection-naïve individuals. However, there are no data about T-cell response in individuals with pre-existing cellular immunity.
We evaluated T-cell responses in parallel with SARS-CoV-2 antibody level after first dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in 23 infection-naïve and 27 convalescent healthcare workers (HCWs) previously included in a study about humoral and T-cell immunity.
Overall, the antibody response was lower in the infection-naïve group than in convalescent individuals (18 895 vs 662.7 AU mL, < 0.001), and intermediate but significantly lower in convalescent HCWs with previous negative serology (25 174 vs 1793 AU mL; = 0.015). Indeed, anti-spike IgG titres after the first dose correlated with baseline anti-nucleocapsid IgG titres (rho = 0.689; < 0.001). Pre-existing T-cell immunity was observed in 78% of convalescent and 65% of the infection-naïve HCWs. T-cell response after the first dose of the vaccine was observed in nearly all the cases with pre-existing T-cell immunity, reaching 94% in convalescent HCWs and 93% in those with cross-reactive T cells. It was lower in the infection-naïve group (50%; = 0.087) and in convalescent HCWs with negative serology (56%; = 0.085). Notably, systemic reactogenicity after vaccination was mainly observed in those with pre-existing T-cell immunity ( = 0.051).
Here, we report that the first dose of BTN162b2 elicits a similar S-specific T-cell response in cases of either past infection or cross-reactive T cells, but lower in the rest of infection-naïve individuals and in convalescent HCWs who have lost detectable specific antibodies during follow-up.
与未感染过新冠病毒的个体相比,新冠康复者对第一剂BNT162b2新冠病毒疫苗的抗体反应更强。然而,关于已有细胞免疫的个体的T细胞反应尚无数据。
我们在23名未感染过新冠病毒和27名康复医护人员(HCW)中,在接种第一剂BNT162b2疫苗后,平行评估了T细胞反应与新冠病毒抗体水平,这些人员之前参与了一项关于体液免疫和T细胞免疫的研究。
总体而言,未感染过新冠病毒的组的抗体反应低于康复个体(18895对662.7 AU/mL,P<0.001),既往血清学阴性的康复医护人员的抗体反应处于中间水平但显著较低(25174对1793 AU/mL;P=0.015)。实际上,第一剂疫苗接种后的抗刺突IgG滴度与基线抗核衣壳IgG滴度相关(rho=0.689;P<0.001)。在78%的康复医护人员和65%的未感染过新冠病毒的医护人员中观察到了既往存在的T细胞免疫。在几乎所有存在既往T细胞免疫的病例中都观察到了第一剂疫苗接种后的T细胞反应,康复医护人员中达到94%,有交叉反应性T细胞的人员中达到93%。在未感染过新冠病毒的组中较低(50%;P=0.087),在血清学阴性的康复医护人员中也较低(56%;P=0.085)。值得注意的是,疫苗接种后的全身反应原性主要在有既往T细胞免疫的人员中观察到(P=0.051)。
在此,我们报告,第一剂BTN162b2在既往感染或有交叉反应性T细胞的情况下引发相似的刺突特异性T细胞反应,但在其余未感染过新冠病毒的个体以及在随访期间失去可检测到的特异性抗体的康复医护人员中较低。