Suppr超能文献

改良CT严重指数评分与中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值在评估急性胰腺炎严重程度中的准确性比较

Comparison of the Accuracy of Modified CT Severity Index Score and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Assessing the Severity of Acute Pancreatitis.

作者信息

Tahir Hasan, Rahman Sheeraz, Habib Zahid, Khan Yusra, Shehzad Saleha

机构信息

Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.

Department of General Surgery, Liaquat National Hospital and Medical College, Karachi, PAK.

出版信息

Cureus. 2021 Aug 9;13(8):e17020. doi: 10.7759/cureus.17020. eCollection 2021 Aug.

Abstract

Background Acute pancreatitis is an acute gastrointestinal emergency with significant morbidity and mortality if not treated. It can lead to local as well as systemic complications and has a prevalence of 51.07%. Laboratory investigations such as amylase and lipase and ultrasound scan are typically used for the diagnosis. A contrast-enhanced CT scan is considered the gold standard. Both laboratory and radiological investigation-based scoring systems have been reported in the literature and are in practice. However, these modalities demand several laboratory investigations and are expensive. Our study aims to determine the congruency of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the modified CT severity index score (MCTSI) with the revised Atlanta classification in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. In addition, the accuracy of NLR and MCTSI is determined. The secondary objective is to determine whether NLR can predict the severity of acute pancreatitis to the same extent as MCTSI through expensive radiological imaging and other clinical scoring systems through a list of investigations. Methodology The data for this study were collected retrospectively and patients with a diagnosis of acute pancreatitis were included through the nonprobability convenience sampling method. All patients underwent relevant laboratory workup (including complete blood count) and radiological workup (including CT scan) during their hospital stay. The main outcome measures were sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NLR and MCTSI, and the congruency of these with the revised Atlanta classification in assessing the severity of acute pancreatitis. Results A total of 166 patients with acute pancreatitis were included, of which 107 (64.45%) were males and 59 (35.55%) were females, with a mean age of 43.7. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of NLR were 67%, 90.9%, and 76%, respectively, whereas the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of MCTSI were 95%, 13.6%, and 62%, respectively. The area under the curve for NLR was 0.855 whereas that for MCTSI was determined to be 0.645. Conclusions NLR has a good concordance with the revised Atlanta classification and assesses the disease severity, especially in moderate-to-severe cases of acute pancreatitis compared to MCTSI. In addition, NLR can be used in acute and/or resource-poor settings to predict the severity of acute pancreatitis.

摘要

背景

急性胰腺炎是一种急性胃肠道急症,若不治疗会导致较高的发病率和死亡率。它可引发局部及全身并发症,患病率为51.07%。淀粉酶和脂肪酶等实验室检查以及超声扫描通常用于诊断。增强CT扫描被视为金标准。文献中已报道并在实际应用基于实验室和影像学检查的评分系统。然而,这些检查方式需要多项实验室检查且费用高昂。我们的研究旨在确定中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比值(NLR)和改良CT严重指数评分(MCTSI)与修订后的亚特兰大分类在评估急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的一致性。此外,还确定了NLR和MCTSI的准确性。次要目标是通过一系列检查,确定NLR是否能与MCTSI一样,通过昂贵的影像学检查和其他临床评分系统预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度。

方法

本研究数据通过回顾性收集,采用非概率便利抽样法纳入诊断为急性胰腺炎的患者。所有患者在住院期间均接受了相关实验室检查(包括全血细胞计数)和影像学检查(包括CT扫描)。主要观察指标为NLR和MCTSI的敏感性、特异性和准确性,以及它们与修订后的亚特兰大分类在评估急性胰腺炎严重程度方面的一致性。

结果

共纳入166例急性胰腺炎患者,其中男性107例(64.45%),女性59例(35.55%),平均年龄43.7岁。NLR的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为67%、90.9%和76%,而MCTSI的敏感性、特异性和准确性分别为95%、13.6%和62%。NLR的曲线下面积为0.855,而MCTSI的曲线下面积为0.645。

结论

与MCTSI相比,NLR与修订后的亚特兰大分类具有良好的一致性,能够评估疾病严重程度,尤其是在中重度急性胰腺炎病例中。此外,NLR可用于急性和/或资源匮乏的环境中预测急性胰腺炎的严重程度。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6675/8425492/02c662cd8ef4/cureus-0013-00000017020-i01.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验