• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用连通笔作为一种诊断工具,评估 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者漏注剂量行为。

Use of Connected Pen as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate Missed Bolus Dosing Behavior in People with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.

机构信息

Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA.

Dexcom, Inc., San Diego, California, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Jan;24(1):61-66. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0239. Epub 2021 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1089/dia.2021.0239
PMID:34524010
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8783630/
Abstract

This study used connected pen to determine missed bolus dose (MBD) frequency during masked and unmasked continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) periods and examined its link with time-in-range (TIR), time-above-range (TAR), time-below-range (TBR), and key participant characteristics in people with diabetes. This was a 12-week, single-arm, exploratory, two-period study for people with type 1 diabetes (T1D) or type 2 diabetes (T2D). The primary objective was to estimate the average number of MBD during masked and real-time CGM use. The secondary objective was to estimate the average percent TIR and its relationship to MBD. An exploratory objective was to investigate the participant characteristics that were associated with MBD. Data were analyzed for differences in MBD by diabetes type and other participant characteristics, by CGM period, and by hypoglycemic fear scores. Participants ( = 64; T1D,  = 38; T2D,  = 26) were 48 ± 11.9 years old and 44% were female. From the masked to the unmasked period, MBD, %TAR, %TBR, and glycated hemoglobin decreased significantly (0.74 MBD/day to 0.62 MBD/day,  = 0.008; 53.6%-48.1%,  = 0.004; 4.49%-2.93%,  < 0.001; mean 8.8%-8.4%,  < 0.001, respectively), while %TIR increased significantly (41.9%-49.0%,  < 0.001). MBD/day was negatively associated with TIR ( = 0.016) and positively associated with TAR ( = 0.015) for T1D and positively associated with TBR ( = 0.024) for T2D in the masked period only. MBD was significantly associated with fear of hypoglycemia for T2D, but not T1D. MBD is associated with reduced TIR when CGM is masked and tailored therapeutic approaches are needed for T1D and T2D populations.

摘要

本研究使用连续笔来确定戴口罩和不戴口罩时连续血糖监测(CGM)期间的漏注剂量(MBD)频率,并检查其与糖尿病患者的达标时间(TIR)、血糖高于目标范围时间(TAR)、血糖低于目标范围时间(TBR)以及关键患者特征之间的关系。这是一项为期 12 周、单臂、探索性、两期研究,纳入了 1 型糖尿病(T1D)或 2 型糖尿病(T2D)患者。主要目的是估计戴口罩和实时 CGM 使用期间的平均 MBD 数量。次要目的是估计平均 TIR 及其与 MBD 的关系。一个探索性目标是调查与 MBD 相关的患者特征。通过糖尿病类型和其他患者特征、CGM 期间以及低血糖恐惧评分,对 MBD 进行差异分析。参与者( = 64;T1D, = 38;T2D, = 26)年龄为 48 ± 11.9 岁,44%为女性。从戴口罩到不戴口罩期间,MBD、%TAR、%TBR 和糖化血红蛋白显著降低(0.74 MBD/天至 0.62 MBD/天, = 0.008;53.6%-48.1%, = 0.004;4.49%-2.93%, < 0.001;平均 8.8%-8.4%, < 0.001),而%TIR 显著增加(41.9%-49.0%, < 0.001)。在戴口罩期间,MBD/天与 TIR 呈负相关( = 0.016),与 TAR 呈正相关( = 0.015),仅与 T2D 呈正相关( = 0.024)。MBD 与 T2D 的低血糖恐惧显著相关,但与 T1D 无关。当 CGM 被掩盖时,MBD 与 TIR 降低有关,需要为 T1D 和 T2D 人群制定有针对性的治疗方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2b/8783630/54c377048ec9/dia.2021.0239_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2b/8783630/54c377048ec9/dia.2021.0239_figure1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e2b/8783630/54c377048ec9/dia.2021.0239_figure1.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of Connected Pen as a Diagnostic Tool to Evaluate Missed Bolus Dosing Behavior in People with Type 1 and Type 2 Diabetes.使用连通笔作为一种诊断工具,评估 1 型和 2 型糖尿病患者漏注剂量行为。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Jan;24(1):61-66. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0239. Epub 2021 Nov 1.
2
Glycaemia in low-premixed insulin analogue type 2 diabetes patients in a real-world setting: are the CGM targets met?真实世界环境中预混胰岛素类似物治疗 2 型糖尿病患者的血糖:是否达到了 CGM 目标?
Eur J Med Res. 2023 Mar 7;28(1):111. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01081-y.
3
Continuous glucose monitoring metrics (Mean Glucose, time above range and time in range) are superior to glycated haemoglobin for assessment of therapeutic efficacy.连续血糖监测指标(平均血糖、血糖超标时间和血糖达标时间)优于糖化血红蛋白,可用于评估治疗效果。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2023 Feb;25(2):596-601. doi: 10.1111/dom.14906. Epub 2022 Dec 1.
4
Comparing Patch vs Pen Bolus Insulin Delivery in Type 2 Diabetes Using Continuous Glucose Monitoring Metrics and Profiles.比较使用连续血糖监测指标和图谱的 2 型糖尿病患者中贴片与笔芯胰岛素给药的效果。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Sep;16(5):1167-1173. doi: 10.1177/19322968211016513. Epub 2021 May 19.
5
Increased Time in Range and Fewer Missed Bolus Injections After Introduction of a Smart Connected Insulin Pen.引入智能连接胰岛素笔后,时间在目标范围内的时间增加,漏注的次数减少。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Oct;22(10):709-718. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0411. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
6
The Optimal Duration of a Run-In Period to Initiate Continuous Glucose Monitoring for a Randomized Trial.启动随机试验连续血糖监测的最佳导入期持续时间。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Dec;24(12):868-872. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0274.
7
Predictors of use and improvement in glycemic indices after initiating continuous glucose monitoring in real world: Data from Saudi Arabia.现实世界中启动持续血糖监测后血糖指数使用及改善的预测因素:来自沙特阿拉伯的数据。
Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2022 Feb;16(2):102416. doi: 10.1016/j.dsx.2022.102416. Epub 2022 Jan 31.
8
An Assessment of Clinical Continuous Glucose Monitoring Targets for Older and High-Risk People Living with Type 1 Diabetes.对1型糖尿病老年及高危患者临床连续血糖监测目标的评估
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2023 Feb;25(2):108-115. doi: 10.1089/dia.2022.0350. Epub 2022 Dec 13.
9
Real-World Continuous Glucose Monitoring Data from a Population with Type 1 Diabetes in South Korea: Nationwide Single-System Analysis.韩国 1 型糖尿病患者的真实世界连续血糖监测数据:全国单一系统分析。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Jun;26(6):394-402. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0513. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
10
Reduction of clinically important low glucose excursions with a long-term implantable continuous glucose monitoring system in adults with type 1 diabetes prone to hypoglycaemia: the France Adoption Randomized Clinical Trial.长期植入式连续血糖监测系统减少 1 型糖尿病易发生低血糖成人的临床重要性低血糖事件:法国采用随机临床试验。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2022 May;24(5):859-867. doi: 10.1111/dom.14644. Epub 2022 Feb 7.

引用本文的文献

1
Digital Health in Diabetes Care: A Narrative Review from Monitoring to the Management of Systemic and Neurologic Complications.糖尿病护理中的数字健康:从监测到全身及神经并发症管理的叙述性综述
J Clin Med. 2025 Jun 14;14(12):4240. doi: 10.3390/jcm14124240.
2
Characterizing insulin dosing behaviour and glycaemic excursions: Development of metrics using connected insulin pen and continuous glucose monitoring.胰岛素给药行为及血糖波动特征分析:利用连接式胰岛素笔和持续葡萄糖监测开发指标
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2025 May;27(5):2507-2514. doi: 10.1111/dom.16249. Epub 2025 Feb 10.
3
Identifying the Relationship Between CGM Time in Range and Basal Insulin Adherence in People With Type 2 Diabetes.

本文引用的文献

1
Increased Time in Range and Fewer Missed Bolus Injections After Introduction of a Smart Connected Insulin Pen.引入智能连接胰岛素笔后,时间在目标范围内的时间增加,漏注的次数减少。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Oct;22(10):709-718. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0411. Epub 2020 Mar 11.
2
Examining the Relationship Between Pre- and Postprandial Glucose Levels and Insulin Bolus Timing Using Bluetooth-Enabled Insulin Pen Cap Technology and Continuous Glucose Monitoring.使用蓝牙胰岛素笔帽技术和连续血糖监测评估餐前和餐后血糖水平与胰岛素推注时间的关系。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jan;22(1):19-24. doi: 10.1089/dia.2019.0186. Epub 2019 Sep 26.
3
确定2型糖尿病患者动态血糖监测血糖处于目标范围内的时间与基础胰岛素依从性之间的关系。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2024 Nov 10:19322968241296828. doi: 10.1177/19322968241296828.
4
Impact of Missed and Late Meal Boluses on Glycemic Outcomes in Automated Insulin Delivery-Treated Children and Adolescents with Type 1 Diabetes: A Two-Center, Population-Based Cohort Study.错过和延迟进餐大剂量胰岛素对接受自动胰岛素输注治疗的 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年血糖结果的影响:一项基于人群的两中心队列研究。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Dec;26(12):897-907. doi: 10.1089/dia.2024.0022. Epub 2024 Jun 24.
5
Association Between Treatment Adherence and Continuous Glucose Monitoring Outcomes in People With Diabetes Using Smart Insulin Pens in a Real-World Setting.在真实环境中使用智能胰岛素笔的糖尿病患者中,治疗依从性与连续血糖监测结果之间的关系。
Diabetes Care. 2024 Jun 1;47(6):995-1003. doi: 10.2337/dc23-2176.
6
Future of Time-in-Range Goals in the Era of Advanced Hybrid Closed-Loop Automated Insulin Delivery Systems.高级混合闭环自动化胰岛素输送系统时代的时间范围内目标的未来。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2024 Mar;26(S3):102-106. doi: 10.1089/dia.2023.0432.
7
A Three-Step Data-Driven Methodology to Assess Adherence to Basal Insulin Therapy in Patients With Insulin-Treated Type 2 Diabetes.一种用于评估胰岛素治疗的2型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素治疗依从性的三步数据驱动方法。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 May;19(3):749-757. doi: 10.1177/19322968231222007. Epub 2023 Dec 29.
8
First Real-World Experience With Bigfoot Unity: A 6-Month Retrospective Analysis.首次使用大脚怪Unity的真实世界经验:一项为期6个月的回顾性分析。
Clin Diabetes. 2023 Fall;41(4):539-548. doi: 10.2337/cd22-0126. Epub 2023 Jun 21.
9
Personalized Prediction of Change in Fasting Blood Glucose Following Basal Insulin Adjustment in People With Type 2 Diabetes: A Proof-of-Concept Study.2型糖尿病患者基础胰岛素调整后空腹血糖变化的个性化预测:一项概念验证研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 May;19(3):769-777. doi: 10.1177/19322968231201400. Epub 2023 Oct 2.
10
Advances in Continuous Glucose Monitoring and Integrated Devices for Management of Diabetes with Insulin-Based Therapy: Improvement in Glycemic Control.连续血糖监测和胰岛素治疗糖尿病管理的集成设备的进展:血糖控制的改善。
Diabetes Metab J. 2023 Jan;47(1):27-41. doi: 10.4093/dmj.2022.0271. Epub 2023 Jan 12.
Nonadherence to Insulin Therapy Detected by Bluetooth-Enabled Pen Cap Is Associated With Poor Glycemic Control.
通过蓝牙智能笔帽检测到的胰岛素治疗不依从与血糖控制不佳有关。
Diabetes Care. 2019 Jun;42(6):1129-1131. doi: 10.2337/dc18-1631. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
4
Effect of initiating use of an insulin pump in adults with type 1 diabetes using multiple daily insulin injections and continuous glucose monitoring (DIAMOND): a multicentre, randomised controlled trial.使用多次胰岛素注射和连续血糖监测的 1 型糖尿病成人中起始使用胰岛素泵的效果(DIAMOND):一项多中心、随机对照试验。
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2017 Sep;5(9):700-708. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(17)30217-6. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
5
A Systematic Review of Insulin Adherence Measures in Patients with Diabetes.糖尿病患者胰岛素依从性测量的系统评价。
J Manag Care Spec Pharm. 2016 Nov;22(11):1224-1246. doi: 10.18553/jmcp.2016.22.11.1224.
6
An empirically derived short form of the Hypoglycaemia Fear Survey II.低血糖恐惧调查II的经验性简版。
Diabet Med. 2017 Apr;34(4):500-504. doi: 10.1111/dme.13162. Epub 2016 Jul 9.
7
Identifying the worries and concerns about hypoglycemia in adults with type 2 diabetes.识别2型糖尿病成人患者对低血糖的担忧和顾虑。
J Diabetes Complications. 2015 Nov-Dec;29(8):1171-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2015.08.002. Epub 2015 Aug 7.
8
Frequency of mealtime insulin bolus as a proxy measure of adherence for children and youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus.作为衡量 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年患者治疗依从性的替代指标,餐时胰岛素追加注射的频率。
Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15(2):124-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0229. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
9
The impact of treatment non-compliance on mortality in people with type 1 diabetes.治疗不依从对 1 型糖尿病患者死亡率的影响。
J Diabetes Complications. 2013 May-Jun;27(3):219-23. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 13.
10
Factors associated with injection omission/non-adherence in the Global Attitudes of Patients and Physicians in Insulin Therapy study.胰岛素治疗中患者和医生全球态度研究中与注射遗漏/不依从相关的因素。
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Dec;14(12):1081-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01636.x. Epub 2012 Jul 17.