Suppr超能文献

作为衡量 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年患者治疗依从性的替代指标,餐时胰岛素追加注射的频率。

Frequency of mealtime insulin bolus as a proxy measure of adherence for children and youths with type 1 diabetes mellitus.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas 66160, USA.

出版信息

Diabetes Technol Ther. 2013 Feb;15(2):124-8. doi: 10.1089/dia.2012.0229. Epub 2013 Jan 14.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Electronic measures of adherence can be superior to patient report. In type 1 diabetes, frequency of blood glucose monitoring (BGM), as measured by patients' home blood glucose meters, has already been identified as a valid proxy of adherence. We present methodology to calculate adherence using insulin pump records and evaluate the reliability and validity of this methodology.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Blood glucose meter data, insulin pump records, and corresponding hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) levels were randomly gathered from clinical and research databases for 100 children and youths (referred to hereafter as youths) with type 1 diabetes (mean±SD age, 12.7±4.6 years). Youths' mean frequency of daily BGM was calculated. Additionally, we calculated a mean mealtime insulin bolus score (BOLUS): youths received 1 point each for a bolus between 0600 and 1000 h, 1100 and 1500 h, and 1600 and 2200 h (maximum of 1 point/meal or 3 points/day).

RESULTS

Simple correlations between youths' HbA1c level, age, frequency of BGM, and insulin BOLUS scores were all significant. Partial correlations and multiple regression analyses revealed that insulin BOLUS scores better explain variations in HbA1c levels than the electronically recorded frequency of daily blood glucose measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our procedures for calculating insulin BOLUS scores using insulin pump records demonstrate better concurrent validity with youths' HbA1c levels than that of the frequency of BGM with youths' HbA1c levels. Our analyses have shown that insulin bolus scoring was superior to the frequency of BGM in predicting youths' HbA1c levels.

摘要

背景

电子测量的依从性可能优于患者报告。在 1 型糖尿病中,患者家用血糖仪测量的血糖监测频率(BGM)已被确定为依从性的有效替代指标。我们介绍了一种使用胰岛素泵记录计算依从性的方法,并评估了该方法的可靠性和有效性。

受试者和方法

从临床和研究数据库中随机收集了 100 名 1 型糖尿病儿童和青少年(简称青少年)的血糖仪数据、胰岛素泵记录和相应的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平(平均年龄±标准差,12.7±4.6 岁)。计算了青少年每日 BGM 的平均频率。此外,我们还计算了平均进餐时胰岛素推注评分(BOLUS):青少年在 0600 至 1000 h、1100 至 1500 h 和 1600 至 2200 h 之间给予 1 个推注点(最大 1 点/餐或 3 点/天)。

结果

青少年的 HbA1c 水平、年龄、BGM 频率和胰岛素 BOLUS 评分之间的简单相关性均具有统计学意义。偏相关和多元回归分析显示,胰岛素 BOLUS 评分比电子记录的每日血糖测量频率更能解释 HbA1c 水平的变化。

结论

我们使用胰岛素泵记录计算胰岛素 BOLUS 评分的程序与青少年的 HbA1c 水平具有更好的一致性,优于 BGM 频率与青少年的 HbA1c 水平的相关性。我们的分析表明,胰岛素推注评分在预测青少年的 HbA1c 水平方面优于 BGM 频率。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

8
Simulation Platform Development for Diabetes and Technology Self-Management.糖尿病与技术自我管理模拟平台开发。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Nov;16(6):1451-1460. doi: 10.1177/19322968211029303. Epub 2021 Jul 22.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验