Suppr超能文献

美国人口健康趋势:政策、政治和利润的核心作用。

Trends in U.S. Population Health: The Central Role of Policies, Politics, and Profits.

机构信息

Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.

University of Texas at Austin, Austin, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Health Soc Behav. 2021 Sep;62(3):286-301. doi: 10.1177/00221465211015411.

Abstract

Recent trends in U.S. health have been mixed, with improvements among some groups and geographic areas alongside declines among others. Medical sociologists have contributed to the understanding of those disparate trends, although important questions remain. In this article, we review trends since the 1980s in key indicators of U.S. health and weigh evidence from the last decade on their causes. To better understand contemporary trends in health, we propose that commonly used conceptual frameworks, such as social determinants of health, should be strengthened by prominently incorporating commercial, political-economic, and legal determinants. We illustrate how these structural determinants can provide new insights into health trends, using disparate health trajectories across U.S. states as an example. We conclude with suggestions for future research: focusing on structural causes of health trends and inequalities, expanding interdisciplinary perspectives, and integrating methods better equipped to handle the complexity of causal processes driving health trends and inequalities.

摘要

近年来,美国的健康状况喜忧参半,一些群体和地区的健康状况有所改善,而其他群体和地区的健康状况则有所下降。医学社会学家对这些不同的趋势做出了贡献,但仍有一些重要的问题悬而未决。在本文中,我们回顾了自 20 世纪 80 年代以来美国健康的主要指标的趋势,并权衡了过去十年关于这些趋势原因的证据。为了更好地了解当代健康趋势,我们建议通过突出商业、政治经济和法律决定因素,加强健康决定因素等常用概念框架。我们用美国各州不同的健康轨迹为例来说明这些结构决定因素如何为健康趋势提供新的见解。最后,我们提出了未来研究的建议:关注健康趋势和不平等的结构性原因,扩大跨学科视角,更好地整合方法,以应对驱动健康趋势和不平等的因果过程的复杂性。

相似文献

2
The U-Shaped Curve of Health Inequalities Over the 20th and 21st Centuries.20 世纪和 21 世纪健康不平等的 U 型曲线。
Int J Soc Determinants Health Health Serv. 2024 Jul;54(3):199-205. doi: 10.1177/27551938241244695. Epub 2024 Apr 1.
3
US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy.美国的州政策、政治与预期寿命
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):668-699. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12469. Epub 2020 Aug 4.
5
Advocacy for health equity: a synthesis review.健康公平倡导:一项综合综述。
Milbank Q. 2015 Jun;93(2):392-437. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12112.
9
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.迈向政治发展科学。
Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410.
10
[Policies to reduce health inequalities].[减少健康不平等的政策]
Gac Sanit. 2008 Sep-Oct;22(5):465-73. doi: 10.1157/13126929.

引用本文的文献

2
Native American "deaths of despair" and economic conditions.美国原住民的“绝望死亡”与经济状况。
Res Soc Stratif Mobil. 2024 Feb;89. doi: 10.1016/j.rssm.2023.100880. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
7
The urban-rural gap in older Americans' healthy life expectancy.美国老年人健康预期寿命的城乡差距。
J Rural Health. 2025 Jan;41(1):e12875. doi: 10.1111/jrh.12875. Epub 2024 Sep 24.

本文引用的文献

3
US State Polarization, Policymaking Power, and Population Health.美国的政治极化、政策制定权与人口健康。
Milbank Q. 2020 Dec;98(4):1033-1052. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12482. Epub 2020 Oct 20.
4
US State Policies, Politics, and Life Expectancy.美国的州政策、政治与预期寿命
Milbank Q. 2020 Sep;98(3):668-699. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.12469. Epub 2020 Aug 4.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验