Giossi Riccardo, Menichelli Danilo, Pani Arianna, Tratta Elena, Romandini Alessandra, Roncato Rossana, Nani Alessandro, Schenardi Paolo, Diani Erika, Fittipaldo Veronica Andrea, Farcomeni Alessio, Scaglione Francesco, Pastori Daniele
Postgraduate School of Clinical Pharmacology, Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Department of Clinical Internal, Anesthesiological and Cardiovascular Sciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Front Pharmacol. 2021 Sep 2;12:698008. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.698008. eCollection 2021.
Antithrombotic treatment, including low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UFH), has been proposed as a potential therapy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) to lower diffuse intravascular clotting activation. However, it is unclear whether prophylactic or therapeutic doses have similar efficacy in reducing mortality. We performed a systematic review (PROSPERO registration CRD42020179955) and meta-analysis including observational cohort studies and randomized controlled trials (RCT) evaluating the effectiveness of heparins (either LMWH, UFH, or fondaparinux) in COVID-19 patients. Heparin treatment was compared to no anticoagulation. A subgroup analysis on prophylactic or therapeutic doses compared to no anticoagulation was performed. Prophylactic dose was also compared to full dose anticoagulation. Primary endpoint was all-cause mortality. Secondary endpoints were major bleeding and length of hospital stay (LOS). 33 studies (31 observational, 2 RCT) were included for a total overall population of 32,688 patients. Of these, 21,723 (66.5%) were on heparins. 31 studies reported data on all-cause mortality, showing that both prophylactic and full dose reduced mortality (pooled Hazard Ratio [HR] 0.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.57-0.69 and HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.47-0.66, respectively). However, the full dose was associated with a higher risk of major bleeding (Odds Ratio [OR] 2.01, 95% CI 1.14-3.53) compared to prophylactic dose. Finally, LOS was evaluated in 3 studies; no difference was observed between patients with and without heparins (0.98, -3.87, 5.83 days). Heparin at both full and prophylactic dose is effective in reducing mortality in hospitalized COVID-19 patients, compared to no treatment. However, full dose was associated with an increased risk of bleeding. : https://clinicaltrials.gov/, identifier CRD42020179955.
抗栓治疗,包括低分子量肝素(LMWH)或普通肝素(UFH),已被提议作为2019冠状病毒病(COVID-19)的一种潜在治疗方法,以降低弥漫性血管内凝血激活。然而,预防性或治疗性剂量在降低死亡率方面是否具有相似的疗效尚不清楚。我们进行了一项系统评价(PROSPERO注册号CRD42020179955)和荟萃分析,纳入了观察性队列研究和随机对照试验(RCT),以评估肝素(LMWH、UFH或磺达肝癸钠)对COVID-19患者的有效性。将肝素治疗与不进行抗凝治疗进行比较。对预防性或治疗性剂量与不进行抗凝治疗进行了亚组分析。预防性剂量也与全剂量抗凝治疗进行了比较。主要终点是全因死亡率。次要终点是大出血和住院时间(LOS)。纳入了33项研究(31项观察性研究、2项RCT),总共有32688名患者。其中,21723名(66.5%)接受了肝素治疗。31项研究报告了全因死亡率数据,表明预防性和全剂量均降低了死亡率(合并风险比[HR]分别为0.63,95%置信区间[CI]0.57-0.69和HR 0.56,95%CI 0.47-0.66)。然而,与预防性剂量相比,全剂量与大出血风险较高相关(优势比[OR]2.01,95%CI 1.14-3.53)。最后,在3项研究中评估了住院时间;使用肝素和未使用肝素的患者之间未观察到差异(0.98,-3.87,5.83天)。与不治疗相比,全剂量和预防性剂量的肝素在降低住院COVID-19患者的死亡率方面均有效。然而,全剂量与出血风险增加相关。:https://clinicaltrials.gov/,标识符CRD42020179955。