Yu Ya-Hui, Oh In-Sun, Jeong Han Eol, Platt Robert W, Douros Antonios, Shin Ju-Young, Filion Kristian B
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Occupational Health, McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Centre for Clinical Epidemiology, Lady Davis Institute, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, QC, Canada.
Front Pharmacol. 2022 Nov 24;13:1034636. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2022.1034636. eCollection 2022.
Anticoagulants are a potential treatment for the thrombotic complications resulting from COVID-19. We aimed to determine the association between anticoagulant use and adverse outcomes among hospitalized patients with COVID-19. We used data from the COVID-19 International Collaborative Research Project in South Korea from January to June 2020. We defined exposure using an intention-to-treat approach, with person-time classified as use or non-use of anticoagulants at cohort entry, and a time-varying approach. The primary outcome was all-cause, in-hospital mortality; the secondary outcome was a composite including respiratory outcomes, cardiovascular outcomes, venous thromboembolism, major bleeding, and intensive care unit admission. Cox proportional hazards models estimated adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of the outcomes comparing use versus non-use of anticoagulants. Our cohort included 2,677 hospitalized COVID-19 patients, of whom 24 received anticoagulants at cohort entry. Users were older and had more comorbidities. The crude incidence rate (per 1,000 person-days) of mortality was 5.83 (95% CI: 2.80, 10.72) among anticoagulant users and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.14, 1.59) for non-users. Crude rates of the composite outcome were 3.20 (95% CI: 1.04, 7.47) and 1.80 (95% CI: 1.54, 2.08), respectively. Adjusted HRs for mortality (HR: 1.12, 95% CI: 0.48, 2.64) and the composite outcome (HR: 0.79, 95% CI: 0.28, 2.18) were inconclusive. Although our study was not able to draw conclusions on anticoagulant effectiveness for COVID-19 outcomes, these results can contribute to future knowledge syntheses of this important question. Our study demonstrated that the dynamic pandemic environment may have important implications for observational studies of COVID-19 treatment effectiveness.
抗凝剂是治疗新型冠状病毒肺炎(COVID-19)所致血栓并发症的一种潜在疗法。我们旨在确定COVID-19住院患者使用抗凝剂与不良结局之间的关联。我们使用了2020年1月至6月韩国COVID-19国际合作研究项目的数据。我们采用意向性分析方法定义暴露情况,将队列进入时的人时分为使用或未使用抗凝剂,并采用随时间变化的方法。主要结局是全因院内死亡率;次要结局是一个复合结局,包括呼吸结局、心血管结局、静脉血栓栓塞、大出血和重症监护病房入住情况。Cox比例风险模型估计了比较使用与未使用抗凝剂时结局的调整后风险比(HR)。我们的队列包括2677例COVID-19住院患者,其中24例在队列进入时接受了抗凝剂治疗。使用者年龄较大且合并症较多。抗凝剂使用者的粗死亡率(每1000人日)为5.83(95%CI:2.80,10.72),未使用者为1.36(95%CI:1.14,1.59)。复合结局的粗发生率分别为3.20(95%CI:1.04,7.47)和1.80(95%CI:1.54,2.08)。死亡率(HR:1.12,95%CI:0.48,2.64)和复合结局(HR:0.79,95%CI:0.28,2.18)的调整后HR无定论。虽然我们的研究未能就抗凝剂对COVID-19结局的有效性得出结论,但这些结果可为这一重要问题的未来知识综合提供参考。我们的研究表明,动态的疫情环境可能对COVID-19治疗效果的观察性研究具有重要意义。