Suppr超能文献

高等教育质量与教授和学生的满意度。

Quality in Higher Education and Satisfaction among Professors and Students.

作者信息

Olmos-Gómez María Del Carmen, Luque-Suárez Mónica, Ferrara Concetta, Cuevas-Rincón Jesús Manuel

机构信息

Department of Research Methods and Diagnosis in Education, Faculty of Education and Sport Science, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain.

Department of Sociology, Faculty of Education and Sport Science, University of Granada, 52005 Melilla, Spain.

出版信息

Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Feb 21;11(1):219-229. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11010017.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to analyze the significant differences in satisfaction with educational quality in higher education in Italy (Naples) among students and professors. The sample consisted of 501 higher education students and 121 professors, resulting in a total sample size of 622 subjects. Once the quality parameters of the instrument were determined, reliability was confirmed, and data collection was initiated. In order to analyze the results, a test of independent means (Student's -test) was performed, interrelating the variables of educational quality, concerning both management and satisfaction with higher education. Based on the results, we concluded that there are significant differences between the group of students and the group of professors, highlighting a higher level of satisfaction with quality reported by students regarding the coordination of teachers and staff in the educational process; therefore, the inclusion of students in the direct management of the center should be more active and an indicator to be taken into account in self-evaluation. Despite the limitations in the sample at the regional level, it offers many possibilities for future research.

摘要

本研究的目的是分析意大利那不勒斯高等教育中,学生和教授对教育质量满意度的显著差异。样本包括501名高等教育学生和121名教授,样本总量为622名受试者。确定该工具的质量参数后,确认了其可靠性并开始数据收集。为了分析结果,进行了独立均值检验(学生t检验),将教育质量变量(涉及管理和对高等教育的满意度)相互关联。基于结果,我们得出结论,学生组和教授组之间存在显著差异,突出表明学生对教育过程中教师和工作人员协调的质量满意度较高;因此,应更积极地让学生参与中心的直接管理,并将其作为自我评估中应考虑的一个指标。尽管区域层面的样本存在局限性,但它为未来研究提供了许多可能性。

相似文献

1
Quality in Higher Education and Satisfaction among Professors and Students.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Feb 21;11(1):219-229. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11010017.
3
Small class sizes for improving student achievement in primary and secondary schools: a systematic review.
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Oct 11;14(1):1-107. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.10. eCollection 2018.
4
Nursing students' satisfaction about their field of study.
J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2014 Apr;2(2):82-7.
6
Faculty of Education Professors' Perception about the Inclusion of University Students with Disabilities.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Nov 6;18(21):11667. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182111667.
7
8
Education for the unified health system: what do good professors do from the perspective of students?
Invest Educ Enferm. 2015 Dec;33(3):500-508. doi: 10.17533/udea.iee.v33n3a14.
10
A comparative study of assessment grading and nursing students' perceptions of quality in sessional and tenured teachers.
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2010 Dec;42(4):423-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2010.01365.x. Epub 2010 Oct 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Critical Thinking in Initial Teacher Training: An Empirical Study from Chile.
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 May 1;15(5):603. doi: 10.3390/bs15050603.
2
Determinants of nursing students' satisfaction with blended learning.
BMC Nurs. 2024 Oct 18;23(1):766. doi: 10.1186/s12912-024-02393-y.
3
The Pedagogical Model of Hybrid Teaching: Difficulties of University Students in the Context of COVID-19.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Oct 22;11(4):1320-1332. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11040096.

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验