• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
The Effects of Implementation Quality of a School-Based Social and Emotional Well-Being Program on Students' Outcomes.一项基于学校的社会和情感幸福计划的实施质量对学生成果的影响。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 May 22;10(2):595-614. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10020044.
2
A Cluster Randomized-Controlled Trial of the MindOut Social and Emotional Learning Program for Disadvantaged Post-Primary School Students.一项针对弱势中学后学生的“MindOut 社会与情绪学习计划”的整群随机对照试验
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Jul;48(7):1245-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-00987-3. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
3
Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach.评估社会情感学习项目的实施质量:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 7;17(9):3249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093249.
4
Impact of a schoolwide social and emotional learning implementation model on student outcomes: The importance of social-emotional leadership.学校层面社会情感学习实施模式对学生成果的影响:社会情感领导力的重要性。
J Sch Psychol. 2023 Jun;98:78-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jsp.2023.01.006. Epub 2023 Mar 28.
5
Quality Matters: Implementation Moderates Student Outcomes in the PATHS Curriculum.质量至关重要:实施情况调节 PATH 课程中学生的成果。
Prev Sci. 2018 Feb;19(2):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0802-4.
6
High quality implementation of 4Rs + MTP increases classroom emotional support and reduces absenteeism.高质量实施4Rs + MTP可增强课堂情感支持并减少旷课现象。
Front Psychol. 2023 Apr 27;14:1065749. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1065749. eCollection 2023.
7
Positive Attitude Upper Middle School social and emotional learning program: influences of implementation quality on program outcome.积极态度初中社会情感学习项目:实施质量对项目成果的影响。
Front Psychol. 2023 May 17;14:1172517. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1172517. eCollection 2023.
8
What Constitutes High-Quality Implementation of SEL Programs? A Latent Class Analysis of Second Step® Implementation.什么构成了社会情感学习(SEL)项目的高质量实施?对“第二步”®实施情况的潜在类别分析
Prev Sci. 2016 Nov;17(8):981-991. doi: 10.1007/s11121-016-0670-3.
9
Effects of ACT Out! Social Issue Theater on Social-Emotional Competence and Bullying in Youth and Adolescents: Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.“行动起来!”社会问题戏剧对青少年社会情感能力及欺凌行为的影响:整群随机对照试验
JMIR Ment Health. 2021 Jan 6;8(1):e25860. doi: 10.2196/25860.
10
The Role of Participant Responsiveness on a Socio-Emotional Learning Program.参与者反应性在社会情感学习项目中的作用。
Span J Psychol. 2017 Jan 19;20:E2. doi: 10.1017/sjp.2016.104.

引用本文的文献

1
Autonomous motivation: school leaders as key drivers of physical activity in the Global Health Program.自主动机:学校领导作为全球健康计划中体育活动的关键驱动因素。
Front Psychol. 2025 Aug 6;16:1646775. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1646775. eCollection 2025.
2
Success4Life Youth Empowerment Pilot for Promoting Well-Being in University Students: A Qualitative Study.“成功人生”青年赋权试点项目促进大学生幸福感的质性研究
Cureus. 2024 Nov 1;16(11):e72858. doi: 10.7759/cureus.72858. eCollection 2024 Nov.
3
Innovating Social-Emotional Learning to Enhance Positive Engagement of Youth With Social Media: A Comprehensive Review of Why and How.创新社会情感学习以增强青少年在社交媒体上的积极参与度:关于原因与方式的全面综述
Cureus. 2024 Sep 24;16(9):e70130. doi: 10.7759/cureus.70130. eCollection 2024 Sep.
4
Protocol of a cluster randomised trial of BodyKind: a school-based body image programme for adolescents.BodyKind 方案:一项基于学校的青少年身体意象方案的整群随机对照试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2023 Nov 14;23(1):2246. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17002-x.
5
Patient Responsiveness to a Sleep and Circadian Intervention in a Sample of Adults With Serious Mental Illness.患者对睡眠和昼夜节律干预措施的反应在有严重精神疾病的成年人样本中。
Behav Ther. 2023 Jan;54(1):101-118. doi: 10.1016/j.beth.2022.07.009. Epub 2022 Aug 2.
6
Problematic smartphone use and specific problematic Internet uses among university students and associated predictive factors: a systematic review.大学生中存在问题的智能手机使用和特定的有问题的互联网使用情况及相关预测因素:一项系统综述
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(6):7111-7204. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11437-2. Epub 2022 Nov 29.
7
Quality in Higher Education and Satisfaction among Professors and Students.高等教育质量与教授和学生的满意度。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2021 Feb 21;11(1):219-229. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe11010017.
8
Students' Personality Contributes More to Academic Performance than Well-Being and Learning Approach-Implications for Sustainable Development and Education.学生的个性对学业成绩的贡献大于幸福感和学习方法——对可持续发展和教育的启示。
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 Dec 6;10(4):1132-1149. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10040079.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating the Implementation Quality of a Social and Emotional Learning Program: A Mixed Methods Approach.评估社会情感学习项目的实施质量:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 7;17(9):3249. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17093249.
2
A Cluster Randomized-Controlled Trial of the MindOut Social and Emotional Learning Program for Disadvantaged Post-Primary School Students.一项针对弱势中学后学生的“MindOut 社会与情绪学习计划”的整群随机对照试验
J Youth Adolesc. 2019 Jul;48(7):1245-1263. doi: 10.1007/s10964-019-00987-3. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
3
Promoting Positive Youth Development Through School-Based Social and Emotional Learning Interventions: A Meta-Analysis of Follow-Up Effects.通过基于学校的社会和情绪学习干预促进青少年积极发展:随访效果的元分析。
Child Dev. 2017 Jul;88(4):1156-1171. doi: 10.1111/cdev.12864.
4
Quality Matters: Implementation Moderates Student Outcomes in the PATHS Curriculum.质量至关重要:实施情况调节 PATH 课程中学生的成果。
Prev Sci. 2018 Feb;19(2):197-208. doi: 10.1007/s11121-017-0802-4.
5
High impact of implementation on school-based smoking prevention: the X:IT study-a cluster-randomized smoking prevention trial.实施对学校吸烟预防的高度影响:X:IT研究——一项整群随机吸烟预防试验
Implement Sci. 2016 Sep 17;11(1):125. doi: 10.1186/s13012-016-0490-7.
6
Maximizing the Implementation Quality of Evidence-Based Preventive Interventions in Schools: A Conceptual Framework.最大化学校中基于证据的预防性干预措施的实施质量:一个概念框架。
Adv Sch Ment Health Promot. 2008 Jul;1(3):6-28. doi: 10.1080/1754730x.2008.9715730.
7
Implemented or not implemented? Process evaluation of the school-based obesity prevention program DOiT and associations with program effectiveness.实施了还是未实施?基于学校的肥胖预防项目DOiT的过程评估及其与项目效果的关联
Health Educ Res. 2016 Apr;31(2):220-33. doi: 10.1093/her/cyw007.
8
Engagement matters: lessons from assessing classroom implementation of steps to respect: a bullying prevention program over a one-year period.参与至关重要:从评估“尊重步骤”课堂实施情况中获得的经验教训:一项为期一年的预防欺凌计划
Prev Sci. 2014 Apr;15(2):165-176. doi: 10.1007/s11121-012-0359-1.
9
Longitudinal effects of universal preventive intervention on prescription drug misuse: three randomized controlled trials with late adolescents and young adults.普遍性预防干预对处方药滥用的纵向影响:对青少年晚期和年轻成年人的三项随机对照试验。
Am J Public Health. 2013 Apr;103(4):665-72. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2012.301209. Epub 2013 Feb 14.
10
Describing teacher-student interactions: a qualitative assessment of teacher implementation of the 7th grade keepin' it REAL substance use intervention.描述师生互动:对教师实施 7 年级保持真实物质使用干预的定性评估。
Am J Community Psychol. 2013 Mar;51(1-2):43-56. doi: 10.1007/s10464-012-9539-1.

一项基于学校的社会和情感幸福计划的实施质量对学生成果的影响。

The Effects of Implementation Quality of a School-Based Social and Emotional Well-Being Program on Students' Outcomes.

作者信息

Dowling Katherine, Barry Margaret M

机构信息

Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91TK33 Galway, Ireland.

出版信息

Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 May 22;10(2):595-614. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10020044.

DOI:10.3390/ejihpe10020044
PMID:34542522
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8314283/
Abstract

School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs can be effective in producing positive outcomes for students. However, when the implementation quality is poor, these programs often lose their effectiveness and fail to produce the expected positive outcomes. The current study evaluates a school-based SEL program for 15-18-year-olds in Ireland by determining the impact of implementation quality on program outcomes. The study also examines the effects on outcomes of different implementation dimensions including Dosage, Adherence, Quality of Delivery, and Participant Responsiveness. Employing a cluster randomized controlled trial design, this study collected student outcome data ( = 675) from 32 disadvantaged schools across three time points (pre-, post-, 12-month follow-up) and compared these data across three treatment groups (high-implementation, low-implementation, and control). Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to determine the relationships between the implementation data and student outcome data longitudinally. The findings revealed that the positive effects of the program were only observed with the high-, but not the low-implementation group (reduced suppression of emotions ( = 0.049); reduced avoidance coping ( = 0.006); increased social support coping ( = 0.009); reduced levels of stress ( = 0.035) and depressive symptoms ( = 0.025). The comparison of implementation dimensions revealed that only Quality of Delivery had a significant effect on all of the tested outcomes. This study highlights the importance of high-quality implementation in producing positive outcomes and supports the need to evaluate implementation using multiple dimensions.

摘要

以学校为基础的社会情感学习(SEL)项目能够有效地为学生带来积极成果。然而,当实施质量较差时,这些项目往往会失去其有效性,无法产生预期的积极成果。本研究通过确定实施质量对项目成果的影响,对爱尔兰一项针对15至18岁青少年的以学校为基础的SEL项目进行评估。该研究还考察了不同实施维度(包括剂量、依从性、实施质量和参与者反应性)对成果的影响。本研究采用整群随机对照试验设计,在三个时间点(干预前、干预后、12个月随访)从32所处境不利的学校收集了学生成果数据( = 675),并在三个治疗组(高实施组、低实施组和对照组)之间对这些数据进行比较。使用线性混合模型(LMM)纵向确定实施数据与学生成果数据之间的关系。研究结果显示,该项目的积极效果仅在高实施组中观察到,而低实施组未观察到(情绪抑制减少( = 0.049);回避应对减少( = 0.006);社会支持应对增加( = 0.009);压力水平降低( = 0.035)和抑郁症状减轻( = 0.025)。实施维度的比较显示,只有实施质量对所有测试成果有显著影响。本研究强调了高质量实施对于产生积极成果的重要性,并支持使用多个维度评估实施情况的必要性。