Dowling Katherine, Barry Margaret M
Health Promotion Research Centre, National University of Ireland Galway, University Road, H91TK33 Galway, Ireland.
Eur J Investig Health Psychol Educ. 2020 May 22;10(2):595-614. doi: 10.3390/ejihpe10020044.
School-based social and emotional learning (SEL) programs can be effective in producing positive outcomes for students. However, when the implementation quality is poor, these programs often lose their effectiveness and fail to produce the expected positive outcomes. The current study evaluates a school-based SEL program for 15-18-year-olds in Ireland by determining the impact of implementation quality on program outcomes. The study also examines the effects on outcomes of different implementation dimensions including Dosage, Adherence, Quality of Delivery, and Participant Responsiveness. Employing a cluster randomized controlled trial design, this study collected student outcome data ( = 675) from 32 disadvantaged schools across three time points (pre-, post-, 12-month follow-up) and compared these data across three treatment groups (high-implementation, low-implementation, and control). Linear mixed models (LMM) were used to determine the relationships between the implementation data and student outcome data longitudinally. The findings revealed that the positive effects of the program were only observed with the high-, but not the low-implementation group (reduced suppression of emotions ( = 0.049); reduced avoidance coping ( = 0.006); increased social support coping ( = 0.009); reduced levels of stress ( = 0.035) and depressive symptoms ( = 0.025). The comparison of implementation dimensions revealed that only Quality of Delivery had a significant effect on all of the tested outcomes. This study highlights the importance of high-quality implementation in producing positive outcomes and supports the need to evaluate implementation using multiple dimensions.
以学校为基础的社会情感学习(SEL)项目能够有效地为学生带来积极成果。然而,当实施质量较差时,这些项目往往会失去其有效性,无法产生预期的积极成果。本研究通过确定实施质量对项目成果的影响,对爱尔兰一项针对15至18岁青少年的以学校为基础的SEL项目进行评估。该研究还考察了不同实施维度(包括剂量、依从性、实施质量和参与者反应性)对成果的影响。本研究采用整群随机对照试验设计,在三个时间点(干预前、干预后、12个月随访)从32所处境不利的学校收集了学生成果数据( = 675),并在三个治疗组(高实施组、低实施组和对照组)之间对这些数据进行比较。使用线性混合模型(LMM)纵向确定实施数据与学生成果数据之间的关系。研究结果显示,该项目的积极效果仅在高实施组中观察到,而低实施组未观察到(情绪抑制减少( = 0.049);回避应对减少( = 0.006);社会支持应对增加( = 0.009);压力水平降低( = 0.035)和抑郁症状减轻( = 0.025)。实施维度的比较显示,只有实施质量对所有测试成果有显著影响。本研究强调了高质量实施对于产生积极成果的重要性,并支持使用多个维度评估实施情况的必要性。