• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

由吸毒者主导的研究:以生活经验为中心的专业知识。

Research led by people who use drugs: centering the expertise of lived experience.

机构信息

North Carolina Survivors Union, 1116 Grove Street, Greensboro, NC, 27403, USA.

Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina At Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

出版信息

Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Sep 20;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00406-6.

DOI:10.1186/s13011-021-00406-6
PMID:34544478
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8454046/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Research collaborations between people who use drugs (PWUD) and researchers are largely underutilized, despite the long history of successful, community-led harm reduction interventions and growing health disparities experienced by PWUD. PWUD play a critical role in identifying emerging issues in the drug market, as well as associated health behaviors and outcomes. As such, PWUD are well positioned to meaningfully participate in all aspects of the research process, including population of research questions, conceptualization of study design, and contextualization of findings.

MAIN BODY

We argue PWUD embody unparalleled and current insight to drug use behaviors, including understanding of novel synthetic drug bodies and the dynamics at play in the drug market; they also hold intimate and trusting relationships with other PWUD. This perfectly situates PWUD to collaborate with researchers in investigation of drug use behaviors and development of harm reduction interventions. While PWUD have a history of mistrust with the medical community, community-led harm reduction organizations have earned their trust and are uniquely poised to facilitate research projects. We offer the North Carolina Survivors Union as one such example, having successfully conducted a number of projects with reputable research institutions. We also detail the fallacy of meaningful engagement posed by traditional mechanisms of capturing community voice. As a counter, we detail the framework developed and implemented by the union in hopes it may serve as guidance for other community-led organizations. We also situate research as a mechanism to diversify the job opportunities available to PWUD and offer a real-time example of the integration of these principles into public policy and direct service provision.

CONCLUSION

In order to effectively mitigate the risks posed by the fluid and volatile drug market, research collaborations must empower PWUD to play meaningful roles in the entirety of the research process. Historically, the most effective harm reduction interventions have been born of the innovation and heart possessed by PWUD; during the current overdose crisis, there is no reason to believe they will not continue to be.

摘要

背景

尽管在社区主导的减少伤害干预方面有着悠久的成功历史,以及药物使用者(PWUD)所经历的日益严重的健康差距,但药物使用者与研究人员之间的研究合作在很大程度上仍未得到充分利用。PWUD 在确定药物市场中出现的新问题以及相关的健康行为和结果方面发挥着至关重要的作用。因此,PWUD 非常有能力有意义地参与研究过程的各个方面,包括提出研究问题、设计研究概念以及使研究结果背景化。

正文

我们认为,PWUD 对药物使用行为具有无与伦比的、当前的洞察力,包括对新型合成药物以及药物市场中动态的理解;他们还与其他 PWUD 建立了亲密和信任的关系。这使 PWUD 能够与研究人员合作,调查药物使用行为并制定减少伤害的干预措施。虽然 PWUD 对医疗界一直存在不信任,但社区主导的减少伤害组织赢得了他们的信任,并非常适合促进研究项目。我们以北卡罗来纳幸存者联盟(North Carolina Survivors Union)为例,该组织与一些知名研究机构成功地开展了多个项目。我们还详细阐述了通过传统方式收集社区意见所带来的虚假的有意义的参与。作为一种替代方法,我们详细介绍了该联盟开发并实施的框架,希望它能为其他社区主导的组织提供指导。我们还将研究定位为为 PWUD 提供多样化就业机会的一种机制,并提供一个实时的例子,说明这些原则如何被纳入公共政策和直接服务提供。

结论

为了有效减轻不断变化和不稳定的药物市场带来的风险,研究合作必须赋予 PWUD 在研究过程的各个方面发挥有意义作用的能力。从历史上看,最有效的减少伤害干预措施源于 PWUD 的创新和奉献精神;在当前的过量用药危机中,没有理由认为他们不会继续这样做。

相似文献

1
Research led by people who use drugs: centering the expertise of lived experience.由吸毒者主导的研究:以生活经验为中心的专业知识。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2021 Sep 20;16(1):70. doi: 10.1186/s13011-021-00406-6.
2
Harm reduction via online platforms for people who use drugs in Russia: a qualitative analysis of web outreach work.通过在线平台减少俄罗斯吸毒者的伤害:网络外展工作的定性分析。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 Dec 9;17(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00452-6.
3
A qualitative examination of substance use service needs among people who use drugs (PWUD) with treatment and service experience in Ontario, Canada.对加拿大安大略省有治疗和服务经历的吸毒者(PWUD)的物质使用服务需求进行定性研究。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):2021. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12104-w.
4
Achieving meaningful participation of people who use drugs and their peer organizations in a strategic research partnership.实现药物使用者及其同伴组织在战略研究伙伴关系中的有意义参与。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Jun 10;16(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0306-6.
5
Practices of care among people who buy, use, and sell drugs in community settings.社区环境中购买、使用和贩卖毒品人群的护理实践。
Harm Reduct J. 2020 May 7;17(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00372-5.
6
Identifying the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on service access for people who use drugs (PWUD): A national qualitative study.识别 COVID-19 大流行对吸毒者(PWUD)获得服务的影响:一项全国性定性研究。
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2021 Oct;129:108374. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108374. Epub 2021 Mar 19.
7
Harm Reduction Services in Ottawa: The Culture of Drug Use.渥太华的减少伤害服务:毒品使用文化。
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2020 May 1;34(2):188-202. doi: 10.1891/RTNP-D-19-00086.
8
Intersecting substance use treatment and harm reduction services: exploring the characteristics and service needs of a community-based sample of people who use drugs.相交的物质使用治疗和减少伤害服务:探索社区为基础的吸毒人群的特点和服务需求。
Harm Reduct J. 2022 Aug 24;19(1):95. doi: 10.1186/s12954-022-00676-8.
9
Young people who use drugs engaged in harm reduction programs in New York City: Overdose and other risks.纽约市参与减少伤害项目的吸毒青年:过量用药及其他风险。
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2017 Sep 1;178:106-114. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2017.04.032. Epub 2017 Jun 15.
10
Harm reduction measures employed by people using opioids with suspected fentanyl exposure in Boston, Baltimore, and Providence.在波士顿、巴尔的摩和普罗维登斯,疑似接触芬太尼的阿片类药物使用者采用的减少危害措施。
Harm Reduct J. 2019 Jun 24;16(1):39. doi: 10.1186/s12954-019-0311-9.

引用本文的文献

1
"To not feel fake, it can't be fake": co-creation of a harm reduction, peer-delivered, health-system intervention for people who use drugs.“要不觉得假,那就不可能是假的”:为吸毒者共同创造一种由同伴提供的减少伤害的卫生系统干预措施。
Harm Reduct J. 2025 Jun 18;22(Suppl 1):108. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01210-2.
2
Rural community-based participatory research with families of people who use drugs: key considerations from a multi-provincial research partnership.针对吸毒者家庭的基于农村社区的参与式研究:来自一个多省研究合作项目的关键考量因素
Harm Reduct J. 2025 May 30;22(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12954-025-01247-3.
3
Championing reproductive and perinatal health with the recovery community: improving access to healthcare and health promotion resources to support recovery.与康复社区共同倡导生殖与围产期健康:改善医疗保健和健康促进资源的可及性,以支持康复。
Front Public Health. 2025 May 14;13:1529169. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1529169. eCollection 2025.
4
A case against purity: prioritizing translational polysubstance use research.反对纯度的案例:优先开展多物质使用的转化研究。
Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 1;38(4):282-286. doi: 10.1097/YCO.0000000000001010. Epub 2025 Apr 23.
5
The co-creation and evaluation of a recovery community center bundled model to build recovery capital through the promotion of reproductive health and justice.通过促进生殖健康和公正来构建康复资本的康复社区中心捆绑模式的共同创建与评估。
Addict Res Theory. 2024;32(6):455-465. doi: 10.1080/16066359.2023.2292589. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
6
Meeting People Where They Are: The Roles of Peer Navigation and Telemedicine for Hepatitis C Virus Elimination.在人们所处的地方与他们相遇:同伴导航和远程医疗在丙型肝炎病毒消除中的作用。
Clin Infect Dis. 2025 Mar 17;80(3):509-511. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciae521.
7
High-dose naloxone formulations are not as essential as we thought.高剂量纳洛酮制剂并不像我们想象的那么重要。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 May 13;21(1):93. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00994-z.
8
Harm reduction workforce, behavioral health, and service delivery in the USA: a cross-sectional study.美国的减少伤害工作者、行为健康和服务提供:一项横断面研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2024 Feb 10;21(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12954-024-00952-9.
9
Evaluating an addiction medicine unit in Sudbury, Ontario Canada: a mixed-methods study protocol.评估加拿大安大略省萨德伯里的一个成瘾医学科:一项混合方法研究方案。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Dec 6;23(1):1366. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-10313-0.
10
Doing community-based research during dual public health emergencies (COVID and overdose).在双重公共卫生紧急事件(COVID 和过量用药)期间开展基于社区的研究。
Harm Reduct J. 2023 Sep 15;20(1):135. doi: 10.1186/s12954-023-00852-4.

本文引用的文献

1
We are the researched, the researchers, and the discounted: The experiences of drug user activists as researchers.我们既是被研究的对象,也是研究人员,还是被低估的人:吸毒者活动家作为研究人员的经历。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Dec;98:103364. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103364. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
2
Lived Experience, Research Leadership, and the Transformation of Mental Health Services: Building a Researcher Pipeline.生活体验、研究领导力以及心理健康服务的转变:建立研究人员的人才库。
Psychiatr Serv. 2021 May 1;72(5):591-593. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.202000468. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
3
Consumer discernment of fentanyl in illicit opioids confirmed by fentanyl test strips: Lessons from a syringe services program in North Carolina.通过芬太尼检测条确认非法阿片类药物中的芬太尼:北卡罗来纳州一个注射器服务项目的经验教训。
Int J Drug Policy. 2021 Jul;93:103128. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2021.103128. Epub 2021 Jan 22.
4
Having a voice and saving lives: a qualitative survey on employment impacts of people with lived experience of drug use working in harm reduction.拥有发言权并拯救生命:关于有吸毒经历的人从事减少伤害工作的就业影响的定性调查。
Harm Reduct J. 2021 Jan 6;18(1):1. doi: 10.1186/s12954-020-00453-5.
5
Lessons learned from the opioid crisis across the pillars of the Canadian drugs and substances strategy.从加拿大毒品和物质战略的支柱层面汲取阿片类药物危机的教训。
Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2019 Aug 19;14(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s13011-019-0220-7.
6
Fentanyl test strips as an opioid overdose prevention strategy: Findings from a syringe services program in the Southeastern United States.芬太尼检测条作为阿片类药物过量预防策略:美国东南部一个注射器服务项目的结果。
Int J Drug Policy. 2019 Jan;63:122-128. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2018.08.007. Epub 2018 Oct 3.
7
"He Is the Object of Information": The Intersection of Big Data and the Opioid Crisis.“他是信息的对象”:大数据与阿片类药物危机的交叉点
Am J Public Health. 2018 Sep;108(9):1122-1123. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304601.
8
Trust and people who inject drugs: The perspectives of clients and staff of Needle Syringe Programs.信任与注射吸毒者:针头注射器项目的服务对象及工作人员的观点
Int J Drug Policy. 2016 Jan;27:138-45. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2015.08.018. Epub 2015 Sep 3.
9
Access to sterile syringes for injecting drug users in New York City: politics and perception (1984-2010).纽约市注射吸毒者获得无菌注射器的途径:政治与认知(1984-2010)。
Subst Use Misuse. 2011;46(2-3):140-9. doi: 10.3109/10826084.2011.523319.
10
Needle exchange as a safe haven in an unsafe world.针具交换作为不安全世界中的安全港。
Drug Alcohol Rev. 2011 Jan;30(1):26-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1465-3362.2010.00188.x.