Suppr超能文献

基于对比和基于臂的网络荟萃分析模型。

Contrast-Based and Arm-Based Models for Network Meta-Analysis.

机构信息

School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.

MRC Clinical Trials Unit at UCL, London, UK.

出版信息

Methods Mol Biol. 2022;2345:203-221. doi: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1566-9_13.

Abstract

Network meta-analysis is used to synthesize evidence from a network of treatments. The models used in a network meta-analysis are more complex than those used for pairwise meta-analysis. Two types of models are available to undertake a network meta-analysis: contrast-based and arm-based models. Contrast-based models have been used in most published network meta-analyses. Arm-based models offer greater flexibility and handle treatments symmetrically, but risk compromising randomization. In this chapter, we (1) present the contrast-based and arm-based statistical models; (2) describe the theoretical differences between the models (noting when the estimates from the models are expected to diverge); (3) summarize the evidence comparing the two models from simulation studies and empirical investigations; and (4) provide a worked example applying the two models to a network using the R software package.

摘要

网络荟萃分析用于综合来自治疗网络的证据。网络荟萃分析中使用的模型比成对荟萃分析中使用的模型更复杂。有两种类型的模型可用于进行网络荟萃分析:基于对照和基于臂的模型。基于对照的模型已在大多数已发表的网络荟萃分析中使用。基于臂的模型提供了更大的灵活性并且对称地处理治疗方法,但存在破坏随机化的风险。在本章中,我们(1)介绍基于对照和基于臂的统计模型;(2)描述模型之间的理论差异(注意何时预计模型的估计值会出现分歧);(3)总结来自模拟研究和实证研究比较两种模型的证据;(4)提供一个使用 R 软件包应用两种模型到网络的示例。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验