Johal Jasmyn K, Gardner Rebecca M, Vaughn Sara J, Jaswa Eleni G, Hedlin Haley, Aghajanova Lusine
Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Quantitative Sciences Unit, Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
F S Rep. 2021 Apr 28;2(3):275-281. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2021.04.007. eCollection 2021 Sep.
To compare the pregnancy outcomes of lesbian women undergoing donor sperm intrauterine insemination (IUI) with that of heterosexual women undergoing IUI using partner or donor sperm.
Retrospective cohort analysis.
Two academic fertility practices.
All IUI cycles between 2007 and 2016.
None.
Primary outcomes included clinical pregnancy (CP) rates and live birth/ongoing pregnancy (LB) rates. The baseline characteristics and cycle characteristics were compared between the two groups using absolute standardized differences (ASDs). To account for the correlation between cycles per patient, a generalized estimating equation method for multivariable logistic regression was used.
A total of 11,870 IUI cycles were included, of which 393 were in lesbian women using donor sperm and 11,477 were in heterosexual women with infertility using either partner or donor sperm. The CP rates were similar between the lesbian and heterosexual groups (13.2% vs. 11.1%, respectively, ASD = 0.06). In addition, the LB rates were similar between the two groups (10.4% vs. 8.3%, respectively, ASD = 0.10). After implementing the generalized estimating equation in a multivariable logistic regression, the lesbian group had an overall higher odds of CP (adjusted odds ratio 1.40, 95% confidence interval: [1.04-1.88]) and LB (adjusted odds ratio 1.59, 95% confidence interval [1.15-2.20]) compared with the heterosexual group. The clinical miscarriage rate was higher in the heterosexual group compared with that in the lesbian group (23.8% vs. 15.4%, respectively, ASD = 0.21).
Although the unadjusted rates were similar between the two groups, the adjusted CP and LB odds were significantly higher for lesbian women undergoing IUI for procreative management than those for heterosexual women undergoing IUI for infertility.
比较接受供精子宫内人工授精(IUI)的女同性恋者与接受伴侣或供精IUI的异性恋女性的妊娠结局。
回顾性队列分析。
两家学术性生育诊所。
2007年至2016年间所有的IUI周期。
无。
主要结局包括临床妊娠(CP)率和活产/持续妊娠(LB)率。使用绝对标准化差异(ASD)比较两组之间的基线特征和周期特征。为了考虑每位患者各周期之间的相关性,采用多变量逻辑回归的广义估计方程法。
共纳入11,870个IUI周期,其中393个是使用供精的女同性恋者的周期,11,477个是患有不孕症的异性恋女性使用伴侣或供精的周期。女同性恋组和异性恋组的CP率相似(分别为13.2%和11.1%,ASD = 0.06)。此外,两组的LB率相似(分别为10.4%和8.3%,ASD = 0.10)。在多变量逻辑回归中实施广义估计方程后,与异性恋组相比,女同性恋组的CP总体优势更高(调整后的优势比为1.40,95%置信区间:[1.04 - 1.88]),LB的优势也更高(调整后的优势比为1.59,95%置信区间[1.15 - 2.20])。异性恋组的临床流产率高于女同性恋组(分别为23.8%和15.4%,ASD = 0.21)。
尽管两组未经调整的比率相似,但对于因生育管理而接受IUI的女同性恋女性,调整后的CP和LB优势明显高于因不孕症接受IUI的异性恋女性。